Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong

views
     
adriancs
post Dec 27 2010, 08:05 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 27 2010, 06:51 PM)
I really workship him ok. He is godlike  rolleyes.gif   whistling.gif
*
Godlike?

C'mon... he's like... the supreme being.

God is Ken-like.


Added on December 27, 2010, 8:06 pm
QUOTE(chobo @ Dec 27 2010, 07:02 PM)
yeap... i just realized that after i took some shots from cameron.... some over shots of mine looks awful.. tongue.gif while some under shots really bring out the greenery or the nature... smile.gif     
a different kind of approach to me... as i seldom take landscape photo... good to know that... biggrin.gif
*
Expose to the right, pp back to the center.

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 27 2010, 08:06 PM
adriancs
post Dec 28 2010, 12:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 27 2010, 10:07 PM)
Sarcastic la mate.
*
Need to have :sarcasm: smiley. I was being the same too... cheers.gif


Added on December 28, 2010, 12:46 am
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Dec 27 2010, 10:48 PM)
picture spam ...

took this at Bukit Melawati ...
user posted image
*
ohmy.gif long lost cousin of mine!!! Blood red angry eyes!

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 28 2010, 12:46 AM
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 10:27 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(g_pentium @ Dec 29 2010, 02:52 AM)
yeah ive tried just now,in m mode with 8000 and aperture of 5.6
no err,but i got no image,black
*
And you expected to get what image exactly, might I ask? doh.gif

Please stop misusing your camera and then think its faulty...


Added on December 29, 2010, 10:35 am
QUOTE(a.ihsan @ Dec 29 2010, 08:02 AM)
its been a while since I last post here. Just want to share some of my latest photos  biggrin.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

both shot with Nikon D700 + CZ 2/35  smile.gif

Also, I shot a prom recently! Click here to view some of the photos.

Oh, I'm thinking of buying a wider lens and I'm on a budget. Does anybody have the Nikon 24mm f/2.8? What do you think of it? Pros and cons?  hmm.gif
*
Nikon's 24/2.8 will not be as sharp as what you'd expect after using CZ. The 24/1.4 is a different story however. I love that lens very much.

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 29 2010, 10:35 AM
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 11:09 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



^

I didn't even bother to take pics at the Mitsubishi booth. The only real way to save them would be trying to replace the green channel with yellow, or do a B&W conversion.
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 02:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Dec 29 2010, 01:41 PM)
D700 weather proof so reliable??
*
Very reliable. But some lenses can't take it. Some extending zoom lens might not be so weather proof due to the extending zoom cam, like the 24-70/2.8. And be careful that rain can still go in through the lens mount, unlss your lens has a rubber seal at the back. But as far as weather sealing goes, the 70-200/2.8 is just about as good as it can ever get.
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 03:45 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 29 2010, 02:12 PM)
maybe that's coz it's just wayyy too underexposed.
underexposed or decent exposure is not the problem here. at iso6400, i can still see a very dim image on the times it work. on the ones that show Err. the image is black. black as in "lens cap on" black.
LOL...i can understand why you're saying that. though this is my first dslr for a week, I've been using dslrs for a long time.

my problem now is, sometimes the mirror/shutter does not complete the whole cycle. let's not talk about underexposed or not. what i'm getting is black. total black like as if u had the lens cap on.

this Err problem happens intermittently but quite frequently. on the times it snaps correctly, I get an underexposed image or a normal image. on the times it fails (Err), i get a "lens cap on" black image.

now it doesnt just happen at 1/8000, it randomly happens at lower shutter speeds like 1/60, 1/40. ISO is at auto, so on the times it work, i get a normal image, on times it fail, i get black image but exif still shows the actual shutter speed i set.

when top LCD shows Err. i switch it off, took out the lens, saw the mirror was up and the shutter was covering the sensor. put it back, switched it on, press the shutter button again, and i can hear the mirror flip down. now I can continue snapping.

sorry if this is real long but i cant really think of a better way to explain this as I dont have a video of it.  notworthy.gif
*
Did you by any chance set the mirror lockup, mirror up for cleaning, or shutter delay function, either accidentally or otherwise? Or maybe assign a custom button function to these settings and accidentally pressed it?

If not... then it would appear to be a mechanical issue. You can try taking pics with the lens off body and have a visual look to see if and when it happens, what actually happens.
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 03:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



^^

Looks like its a real problem. I guess its SC for you... I'm so sorry about your camera.
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 04:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 29 2010, 03:50 PM)
nope. definitely not mirror lockup. see my other replies.

tried without lens, without memory card. still same.


Added on December 29, 2010, 3:51 pm

cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif
it's only a week old. took more than 1k shots since i got it. but it was indoor event so no fast shutter. ytd, tried 1/8000 and then started like that already. now lower, medium shutter speed also like that.  sad.gif
*
its the mirror mechanism I guess...
adriancs
post Dec 29 2010, 10:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



D700. Anything less is crap... Anything more is too expensive n not worth it. :sarcasm:
adriancs
post Dec 30 2010, 09:54 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 30 2010, 09:51 AM)
Fare ? blink.gif
*
Fare in this case means "performs as compared to".


Added on December 30, 2010, 9:56 am
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 30 2010, 09:46 AM)
Now I wonder how does the new 35 f/1.4G fare against this Zeiss 35 f/2.
*
I think we'd have to pixed peep to see the difference... Of course besides the obvious fact that the Nikon is a stop faster, and has autofocus, there shouldn't be much left to nit pick over.


Added on December 30, 2010, 9:57 am
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Dec 30 2010, 03:41 AM)
D300 also crap lah like that?! cry.gif  cry.gif
*
Yes... ever since the D7000 came out, both the D300 and D300s can be considered crap. I don't mean crap per se, but crap compared to the D7000.

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 30 2010, 09:57 AM
adriancs
post Dec 30 2010, 11:09 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 30 2010, 11:04 AM)
Thanks for the only reply bro.. smile.gif
I will get my first non-kit lens tonight  rclxm9.gif  rclxm9.gif  rclxm9.gif
rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  I think I got to try pro body first.  hmm.gif
bro celz. people usually say 50mm is the most normal prime lens. whereby you can di portrait, and most of normal activities.
I am wondering does that mean 50mm on FX body or DX body??
*
Its 50mm on full frame. 50mm lenses used to be sold as "kit lens" 30 years ago with new cameras, before the invention and proliferation of zoom lenses.

On crop sensor, 50mm is like a mid telephoto, equivalent to 85mm FOV on full frame. Not as useful as compared to 50mm FOV.
adriancs
post Dec 30 2010, 11:27 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 30 2010, 11:13 AM)
Is that mean 35mm is it's equivalent on DX lens? but why people are using 50mm on DX lens for portrait nowadays?
*
Because mild telephotos with large apertures are useful for portraiture when you're too lazy to take care of your background in a more artistic way.
adriancs
post Dec 30 2010, 03:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 30 2010, 02:27 PM)
Define 'better'? If you're talking about the DOF then yes generally FX has thinner DOF.

But if bokeh quality for example like how round the highlights etc all depends on the lens.

Anyways, the reason I said my lens all got an 'upgrade' from D700, because of the AF speed. The AF system in D700 is so much faster than on D90's. Another thing to note is my 1635 is finally a real UWA lens, 85mm range is just nice on FX, and 70200 range also superb for my usage now. Not too tele and has a 'wider' end on 70mm too.
*
'
You used a 16-35 on D90??? WTF??? mad.gif
adriancs
post Dec 31 2010, 03:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(yushin @ Dec 31 2010, 02:31 PM)
Yeap. 1:1, If I can get that near to the butterfly lar... tongue.gif
*
Getting near... That is the ultimate skill in nature n macro.
adriancs
post Dec 31 2010, 11:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(BenSow @ Dec 31 2010, 11:01 PM)
i using 1855... so cant take so near one ><
*
50mm f/1.8 and a +4 close up filter does wonders for food photography. Small, light, cheap, works well in dark restaurants and gives very nice shallow DOF.

Take off the filter and then can use to take your date's pic as well.
adriancs
post Dec 31 2010, 11:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Dec 31 2010, 11:13 PM)
18-55 can focus quite close one right? But 35mm f2 and 17-35 f/2.8 is even closer if not mistaken smile.gif
*
I think so... never had much experience with crop bodies.

I had D80's for about a year, used it will my old FF lenses, then traded up to a D700 the minute it was launched. I was shooting an F100 and F80 right up till 2008. Somehow APS-C just never felt right to me.

17-35/2.8 focuses to about 2 inches in front of the front-most element. But that thing is HUGE, and its difficult to use any strobes with it even if its an SB800 on the hotshoe. Best to use off-camera flash. I use the R1C1 if I have to shoot at macro ranges with the 17-35. Also, since its a wideangle, you don't get much magnification out of it as compared to a tele macro or 50/1.8 and close up. It goes up to ~ 1:5 while a 50/1.8 and +4 will get you down to about 1:2.5 life size, double the magnification of the 17-25/2.8

Plus its easier to carry around, and your date won't grumble about your camera's epeen size...

@BenSow: For macro I think MF is the easiest way to focus. It gives you the best control in placing your focus point. Difficult to frame and focus with AF since at macro ranges, a little bit of movement will change your framing by a lot.
adriancs
post Jan 1 2011, 09:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 1 2011, 08:19 AM)
How fast does it read a CF card again?

It has a stand attached using magnet right? Should be this one, http://sandisk.com/products/readers-access...e-usb-20-reader
*
That card reader reads as fast as your USB can handle... Whick is about 30mb/s
adriancs
post Jan 1 2011, 04:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



^

Adobe Lightroom 3



_______________________________________________________________________________





Hehe... O/T Sandy Bridge biggrin.gif Works out of the box

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



This post has been edited by adriancs: Jan 1 2011, 04:21 PM
adriancs
post Jan 1 2011, 05:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



Its 4 cores, 8 threads. I run Ubuntu and virtualize win7 &winxp on it using vmware. That way I can run my desktop practically anywhere and on any hardware.

The drivers aren't difficult. In fact most of it are precompiled into the kernel modules. I just swapped my ssd onto the sandy bridge board and booted it... Worked right out of first boot, unlike windows where you have to install drivers and all...

My printers work, my scanner works, everything works. And with virtualization I dont even have to reinstall windows.

For LR3, go to the develop module. Scroll down on the right pane, NR is there. You can adjust both luma and chroma noise reduction.


Added on January 1, 2011, 5:36 pm
QUOTE(BenSow @ Jan 1 2011, 04:40 PM)
really? I was just called "soha*" for doing 522 in 24 hours LOL...

What do you guys do with DSLR normally? Use until spoil or sell?

I doubt ill be getting a new one anytime soon... Just a student  cry.gif  cry.gif
*
544 in 24 hours is a little la. There was once during an event whickh I dont have to do selections, I shot 5k in 4 hours. Too bad for the editors. Hahaha.


Added on January 1, 2011, 5:39 pm
QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Jan 1 2011, 05:09 PM)
Indian Man in Chinatown

user posted image
Indian Man In Chinatown by Pang YZ, on Flickr
*
Bak Kwa!!!

Haha reminds me of the old movie I Not Stupid. Hehehe!!!

This post has been edited by adriancs: Jan 1 2011, 05:39 PM
adriancs
post Jan 1 2011, 08:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Jan 1 2011, 01:49 PM)
Not your card reader problem. Your computer hard disk and processor problem. They can't cope with the speed.

My AM400 can transfer at 50-60MB/s to Dell Workstation and Mac Pro.
To my asus laptop about 25-30MB/s. dry.gif
*
USB 2.0 transfer rate 60mb/s? I call bs on that.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0252sec    0.28    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 05:50 AM