Guys...First camera DSLR i own is D3000...now i own D7000, one thing I found is that, there is not much different btw both of them..especially when I shoot in the morning. The sharpness still the same!  Even at night, I set to ISO 1600, the noise started to see..

Obvious different that can be feel is, the shutter speed...aii....

Please advice..

Guys...First camera DSLR i own is D3000...now i own D7000, one thing I found is that, there is not much different btw both of them..especially when I shoot in the morning. The sharpness still the same!  Even at night, I set to ISO 1600, the noise started to see..

Obvious different that can be feel is, the shutter speed...aii....

Please advice..

Guys...First camera DSLR i own is D3000...now i own D7000, one thing I found is that, there is not much different btw both of them..especially when I shoot in the morning. The sharpness still the same!  Even at night, I set to ISO 1600, the noise started to see..

Obvious different that can be feel is, the shutter speed...aii....

Please advice..

i think number 4 is not from a dslr.

Look back and think about what I told you before about the high ISO and all about the D7000. Seems like you didn't get it then, and you still don't get it now.

There is no difference except in the lab tests.

Spam some of my pics. Are the technically perfect, no. Zero noise, no. Very very sharp, no. But to me they mean something. Good subjects, good colours to me. Good enough to tell stories to the viewer, I think so.

Look back and think about what I told you before about the high ISO and all about the D7000. Seems like you didn't get it then, and you still don't get it now.

There is no difference except in the lab tests.

Spam some of my pics. Are the technically perfect, no. Zero noise, no. Very very sharp, no. But to me they mean something. Good subjects, good colours to me. Good enough to tell stories to the viewer, I think so.

One of  my own favourite pics


Now tell me. Which of these pics are made with a DLSR, and which are not.

I'm not sure what your friend actually told you but as far as I know, cannot lens cannot work on Nikon body. There are a few reasons :
1) Canon mounting is different from nikon. Canon's mounting size is much bigger than nikon. They are physically and electronically incompatible.
2) Canon lens don't have manual aperture control, you have to shoot wide open.
3) Canon lens flange distance (44mm) is lesser than nikon(46.5mm), you will not be able to focus to infinity.

Nikon mounting are universal, you can mount FX lens on dx, dx lensw on fx. The body will automatically compensate for the smaller image circle. In simple word, yes, FX lens can use on your D3100. Take note that only AFS lenses will AF on D3100, you will loose AF if you use AFD lenses.

On DX non motor body, this is the normal practice for fix lense
shoot normally, get afs 35 1.8
shoot potrait, get afs 50 1.4

ps: The only way I know that can use canon lense on Nikon is by using a macro reversing ring. But your still can't control the aperture unless you have canon body on hand in which it will defeat the purpose for using d3100....

i think number 4 is not from a dslr.

Number 6 caught my eye.. I like the feel though I cant explain it.. LOL

hi bro, how to make it so sharp? what lens and setting? D90 body?

so what do you think? since I am using D3100, should I go for 35mm f1.8 G? or 50mm f1.4 G?
about DX lens, does it mean both DX lens and non DX lens has no difference??

so what do you think? since I am using D3100, should I go for 35mm f1.8 G? or 50mm f1.4 G?
about DX lens, does it mean both DX lens and non DX lens has no difference??

You're right. Its not. Not the only one though.

---

Added on November 21, 2010, 2:18 pm

You're right too. More than 2 are not from a large sensor.



Oh. And be there at the right moment. And bring your camera. Any camera will do.

Look back and think about what I told you before about the high ISO and all about the D7000. Seems like you didn't get it then, and you still don't get it now.

There is no difference except in the lab tests.

Spam some of my pics. Are the technically perfect, no. Zero noise, no. Very very sharp, no. But to me they mean something. Good subjects, good colours to me. Good enough to tell stories to the viewer, I think so.

You're right. Its not. Not the only one though.

---

Added on November 21, 2010, 2:18 pm

You're right too. More than 2 are not from a large sensor.

---

Added on November 21, 2010, 2:29 pm
1. Settings in the head. Previsualize picture in mind.
2. Compose, include subject in frame and exclude distractions. Take into account subject to background relation, foreground objects, depth of field and environmental conditions.
3. Bring camera up to eye. Zoom to frame. Wait for the elements to fall into place.
4. Meter off the correct Zone V area. Over or underexpose Zone V for dynamic range. Dial exposure in.
5. Focus or tap the AF to lock in focus. Reframe if you need to focus off the center AF point.
6. Lock shoulders and elbows in close to your body. Brace the camera against your face. Breathe in, breathe out... hold... squeeze the shutter release.
7. There. Made your good picture.
8. Post process to move back Zone V to correct exposure. Adjust contrast, white and black points. Adjust colour saturation. Apply some sharpening if needed.

Oh. And be there at the right moment. And bring your camera. Any camera will do.

having 2 body ? . sell off the d3000 then