QUOTE(maggi @ Nov 20 2010, 01:40 AM)
Sure, why not? It isn't a FX. QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Nov 20 2010, 01:41 AM)
Hehe, smart The Official Nikon Discussion thread V1, All under one roof !
|
|
Nov 20 2010, 01:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2010, 09:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
^ Seems like a handshake issue? and maybe focusing technique.
|
|
|
Nov 20 2010, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Post a photo, much easier for us to determine what the issue might be.
|
|
|
Nov 21 2010, 12:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(ccf1286 @ Nov 21 2010, 11:18 AM) Guys...First camera DSLR i own is D3000...now i own D7000, one thing I found is that, there is not much different btw both of them..especially when I shoot in the morning. The sharpness still the same! Even at night, I set to ISO 1600, the noise started to see.. o_O, I noticed the ISO performance differences between my D90 and D7000. You're like D3000 and D7000 wor...Obvious different that can be feel is, the shutter speed...aii.... Please advice.. |
|
|
Nov 21 2010, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Just back, was shooting indoor with 85mm and 1635 f/4 VR... now I know I want a 24mm f/1.4 so badly!!! >_<
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
One of the f/1.4... 85mm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 08:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Nov 22 2010, 01:56 AM) Looks a little over to me too, but well my office monitor not calibrated one QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 07:19 AM) Woolala~ What lens is this? Does look like 70200 on FX.This post has been edited by celciuz: Nov 22 2010, 08:21 AM |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 08:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
My pc can't view the exif
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 09:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(fcuk90 @ Nov 21 2010, 10:53 PM) Different quality! I compared before... the Canon one is like thinner :S.QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 08:23 AM) Thanks. D7000? Wohoo~! Well, was looking at friend's D7000 photo. Pretty impressive despite using just the 18-105 to shoot indoor without flash. LOL. The color output from D7000 is really vibrant! Love it~!1 of my friend very bad. keep poison me with D7k And the video on D7k, really I shall resist QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 09:18 AM) Ahh, this shall serve as my second body (or third when I upgrade to FX) |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 09:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 09:26 AM) My friend pair with 17-55. DIE ! Video some more Haha, I tried the D7000 + 85mm just to play around with the focusing xD. Damn fun to see the bokeh LOL.That's just a prototype. No idea. More info from link below. http://www.truphotos.com/2010/11/22/nikon-...-model-cameras/ QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 09:36 AM) SB900! Then no need think of upgrading anytime in the near future. |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 22 2010, 01:00 AM) The f/1.4, nice to use for low light!QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 10:05 AM) Only lens I want now, 35mm f/1.4 and maybe 24mm. Engineering now so geng jor? The only body I want now, 5dMKII features but D3s noise control or even better than D3s ! QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 10:10 AM) 14-24, the king of all UWA~ truly the best of the best |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Nov 22 2010, 10:37 AM) nope.. 82mm mah very2 big ha ha ha.. Hahaha! Yala, means hard to find mah~ much worse than 82mm.last week bought 52mm ND8 filter for my friend.. he search high and low but cant fins.. solution? eBay la... where else.. QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 22 2010, 10:37 AM) If the front element very big then no need to protect? Juz monster hood gao dim? How they mean rear mounted filters? wat u mean Cokin system? Clear piece in front for protection. |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 10:47 AM) If anyone is having problems with your equipment falling on surfaces or objects Seen this sometime ago, looks ugly to me :S. Don't wanna ever carry my DSLR out with that fitted LOL.Camera Armor has made a tough silicon layer that fits to any DSLR Body + with lens protection http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...hl=Camera+Armor Ordered mine yesterday |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 11:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
My friend's Sony 70200 hood also broke into half when dropped it on tar road. Damage sial LOL.
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 22 2010, 11:56 AM) Waaa.... den how's da lens?? Is Sony and Canon 70-200's weight around the same as Nikon? Coz it's so heavy when I hold Nikon, can't imagine it dropping on the floor, internal glass element won't crak?? Lens still okay, still can use for motorsport!QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 12:02 PM) No, the Sony 70200 is not a CZ.QUOTE(chobo @ Nov 22 2010, 12:10 PM) that's going to cost you 1 and a half 1635/85mm... but i think it's worth it... Haha, well somehow I'm addicted to fast lens now!Added on November 22, 2010, 12:11 pm somehow i always prefer over expose picts over under expose.... |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 01:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(adriancs @ Nov 22 2010, 01:44 PM) I'm very happy with my 24/1.4. Absolutely fantastic performance. So good that it has replaced all my other wideangles. Ahh, sounds like poison >_<QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 22 2010, 01:45 PM) I like fast lens. But I still like zoom's versatility |
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 02:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0445sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 12:35 PM |