QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 10:16 PM)
Manual or Auto Focus?Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 11:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 11:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: KL |
@faez u're based in cyber now or in kelate?
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 01:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Nov 8 2010, 11:11 PM) ^ What was the shutter speed? Doesn't look sharply focused for me. And also the picture a bit underexposed lo. Maybe bump up the ISO a little? increasing ISO will not help. The exposure will be the same if you use A/S/P mode. Unless you use Manual.Pic spam? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You should use A mode with Spot Metering. ISO can set to low if your hand can hold the camera with low shutter speed.. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
QUOTE(stsh90 @ Nov 8 2010, 11:14 PM) Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 02:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,075 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM) Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January Perhaps it's not as famous as the CZ 16-80mm lol. I also seldom see people using that, more people will go for 18-200 at that price range because they just want longer reach. But obviously 16-85 is better.Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 08:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
18-200 good for travelling but daily use, 16-85 anytime
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 08:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 08:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM) Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January I have only seen the 16-85 once cause only 1 of my friend uses it. The common ones are the 18-105, 18-55 and Tamron 17-50 VC for DX lens among my circle of friends haha. 18-200 also not common among my friends :S.Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 08:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 08:44 AM) I can see the depth of field there is quite shallow. So, your focusing has to be quite precise. I'm not sure what shutter speed you are using and focal length. The longer you zoom at the pic, the more prone it can get camera shake. General rule of thumb if possible is to have your shutter speed faster than your focal length. E.g. If you zoom at 85mm then your shutter speed should be faster than 1/80s, maybe 1/100s and above. Another thing if possible is to get ample lighting. Your pic will look slightly sharper if the lighting is good. I think you have to fine tune the focus a bit more. In a condition where depth of field is too shallow, you have to take more pics with diff focus adjustments, if you're manual. I understand sometimes autofocus may not do its job well under high magnification. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 08:55 AM) I can see the depth of field there is quite shallow. So, your focusing has to be quite precise. I'm not sure what shutter speed you are using and focal length. The longer you zoom at the pic, the more prone it can get camera shake. General rule of thumb if possible is to have your shutter speed faster than your focal length. E.g. If you zoom at 85mm then your shutter speed should be faster than 1/80s, maybe 1/100s and above. Another thing if possible is to get ample lighting. Your pic will look slightly sharper if the lighting is good. I think you have to fine tune the focus a bit more. In a condition where depth of field is too shallow, you have to take more pics with diff focus adjustments, if you're manual. I understand sometimes autofocus may not do its job well under high magnification. But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker..the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor?
bursting your shots might help as well. =D |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM) But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker.. 0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM) if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor? why bursting the shots can help? bursting your shots might help as well. =D This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 9 2010, 10:08 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM) 0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. should add use lower shutter speed, and burst the shots. bursting might give u a higher chance of getting sharp shots Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am why bursting the shots can help? then again, if you focus manually, the subject not in 100% focus, u burst gao gao also won't help. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:13 AM) should add use lower shutter speed, and burst the shots. bursting might give u a higher chance of getting sharp shots That's why have to take multiple shots of different focus adjustments, take one, move the focus ring slightly, take another, then pick the best pic, just my ideas lar.then again, if you focus manually, the subject not in 100% focus, u burst gao gao also won't help. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM) 0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. At such slow shutter speed, bursting a few shot will help to nail photo without handshake.Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am why bursting the shots can help? |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:17 AM) That's why have to take multiple shots of different focus adjustments, take one, move the focus ring slightly, take another, then pick the best pic, just my ideas lar. i wouldn't rely on manual focusing on a APS-C with such a small view finder. unless he/she is using live view with manual focus assist. or else, it wouldn't really be accurate. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 9 2010, 10:03 AM) Allright. Added on November 9, 2010, 10:42 am QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM) if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor? Ya..i place my camera on the floor..bursting your shots might help as well. =D by the way, what is bursting my shoot? Added on November 9, 2010, 10:43 am QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM) 0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. en.. Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am Added on November 9, 2010, 10:45 amSo, for the summary is...when in dark place, use higher ISO and smaller aperture ( with large number) is it? This post has been edited by KIEN18: Nov 9 2010, 10:45 AM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
At dark place, you need to use as big as possible for your aperture. Else where are you gonna get your light from?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0238sec
0.51
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:31 AM |