Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
37 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong

views
     
geekster129
post Nov 8 2010, 11:13 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 10:16 PM)
Just now i do this..

user posted image

f/8 ISO-250
*
Manual or Auto Focus?
stsh90
post Nov 8 2010, 11:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
824 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: KL


@faez u're based in cyber now or in kelate?
lighter
post Nov 9 2010, 01:10 AM

Recommended Seller
*******
Senior Member
2,478 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Nov 8 2010, 11:11 PM)
^ What was the shutter speed? Doesn't look sharply focused for me. And also the picture a bit underexposed lo. Maybe bump up the ISO a little?

Pic spam?  tongue.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
increasing ISO will not help. The exposure will be the same if you use A/S/P mode. Unless you use Manual.

You should use A mode with Spot Metering. ISO can set to low if your hand can hold the camera with low shutter speed..
FaezFarhan
post Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM

United till I die!
*******
Senior Member
3,435 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kota Bharu



QUOTE(stsh90 @ Nov 8 2010, 11:14 PM)
@faez u're based in cyber now or in kelate?
*
Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January smile.gif

Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? hmm.gif
zellleonhart
post Nov 9 2010, 02:40 AM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM)
Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January smile.gif

Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? hmm.gif
*
Perhaps it's not as famous as the CZ 16-80mm lol. I also seldom see people using that, more people will go for 18-200 at that price range because they just want longer reach. But obviously 16-85 is better.
KTCY
post Nov 9 2010, 08:27 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
18-200 good for travelling but daily use, 16-85 anytime biggrin.gif
KIEN18
post Nov 9 2010, 08:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
176 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 11:13 PM)
Manual or Auto Focus?
*
Manual Focus....
how is it? biggrin.gif
celciuz
post Nov 9 2010, 08:48 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 01:29 AM)
Still in Kelantan lor. My mom is not well, she's been affected with leukemia. So I postponed my intake till January smile.gif

Btw I don't see people using the 16-85. Most people doesn't know about this lens too. Hurm too overpriced? hmm.gif
*
I have only seen the 16-85 once cause only 1 of my friend uses it. The common ones are the 18-105, 18-55 and Tamron 17-50 VC for DX lens among my circle of friends haha. 18-200 also not common among my friends :S.
geekster129
post Nov 9 2010, 08:55 AM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 08:44 AM)
Manual Focus....
how is it? biggrin.gif
*
I can see the depth of field there is quite shallow. So, your focusing has to be quite precise. I'm not sure what shutter speed you are using and focal length. The longer you zoom at the pic, the more prone it can get camera shake. General rule of thumb if possible is to have your shutter speed faster than your focal length. E.g. If you zoom at 85mm then your shutter speed should be faster than 1/80s, maybe 1/100s and above. Another thing if possible is to get ample lighting. Your pic will look slightly sharper if the lighting is good. I think you have to fine tune the focus a bit more. In a condition where depth of field is too shallow, you have to take more pics with diff focus adjustments, if you're manual. I understand sometimes autofocus may not do its job well under high magnification.

KIEN18
post Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
176 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 08:55 AM)
I can see the depth of field there is quite shallow. So, your focusing has to be quite precise. I'm not sure what shutter speed you are using and focal length. The longer you zoom at the pic, the more prone it can get camera shake. General rule of thumb if possible is to have your shutter speed faster than your focal length. E.g. If you zoom at 85mm then your shutter speed should be faster than 1/80s, maybe 1/100s and above. Another thing if possible is to get ample lighting. Your pic will look slightly sharper if the lighting is good. I think you have to fine tune the focus a bit more. In a condition where depth of field is too shallow, you have to take more pics with diff focus adjustments, if you're manual. I understand sometimes autofocus may not do its job well under high magnification.
*
But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker..
the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... rolleyes.gif
celciuz
post Nov 9 2010, 10:03 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM)
But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker..
the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... rolleyes.gif
*
Increase ISO to compensate.
zstan
post Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor?

bursting your shots might help as well. =D
geekster129
post Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM)
But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker..
the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... rolleyes.gif
*
0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. smile.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM)
if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor?

bursting your shots might help as well. =D
*
why bursting the shots can help? hmm.gif


This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 9 2010, 10:08 AM
zstan
post Nov 9 2010, 10:13 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM)
0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. smile.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am

why bursting the shots can help? hmm.gif
*
should add use lower shutter speed, and burst the shots. bursting might give u a higher chance of getting sharp shots notworthy.gif

then again, if you focus manually, the subject not in 100% focus, u burst gao gao also won't help. blush.gif
geekster129
post Nov 9 2010, 10:17 AM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:13 AM)
should add use lower shutter speed, and burst the shots. bursting might give u a higher chance of getting sharp shots notworthy.gif

then again, if you focus manually, the subject not in 100% focus, u burst gao gao also won't help.  blush.gif
*
That's why have to take multiple shots of different focus adjustments, take one, move the focus ring slightly, take another, then pick the best pic, just my ideas lar.
celciuz
post Nov 9 2010, 10:21 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM)
0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. smile.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am

why bursting the shots can help? hmm.gif
*
At such slow shutter speed, bursting a few shot will help to nail photo without handshake.
zstan
post Nov 9 2010, 10:23 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:17 AM)
That's why have to take multiple shots of different focus adjustments, take one, move the focus ring slightly, take another, then pick the best pic, just my ideas lar.
*
i wouldn't rely on manual focusing on a APS-C with such a small view finder. unless he/she is using live view with manual focus assist. or else, it wouldn't really be accurate. laugh.gif
geekster129
post Nov 9 2010, 10:23 AM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 9 2010, 10:21 AM)
At such slow shutter speed, bursting a few shot will help to nail photo without handshake.
*
Haha... I'm going to try this out tonight tongue.gif
KIEN18
post Nov 9 2010, 10:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
176 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 9 2010, 10:03 AM)
Increase ISO to compensate.
*
Allright. smile.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:42 am
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM)
if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor?

bursting your shots might help as well. =D
*
Ya..i place my camera on the floor..
by the way, what is bursting my shoot? brows.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:43 am
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM)
0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. smile.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am

en.. rclxm9.gif


Added on November 9, 2010, 10:45 amSo, for the summary is...when in dark place, use higher ISO and smaller aperture ( with large number) is it?

This post has been edited by KIEN18: Nov 9 2010, 10:45 AM
celciuz
post Nov 9 2010, 10:48 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
At dark place, you need to use as big as possible for your aperture. Else where are you gonna get your light from?

37 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0238sec    0.51    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:31 AM