Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong

views
     
KTCY
post Nov 7 2010, 10:31 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
A suggestion to TS
Keep D7000 in this thread too. Maybe title slightly change to all D80/D90/D7000 discussion thread smile.gif
KTCY
post Nov 7 2010, 11:13 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again

Anyway,
user posted image

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 7 2010, 11:39 AM
KTCY
post Nov 7 2010, 11:07 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
70-300 VRII la sleep.gif
Even 16-85 running on VR II
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 10:22 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Direct flash is ok with tele photo lens la. Bouncing is waste of battery juice. I do direct also when i'm on 70-200 wink.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 11:03 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(adriancs @ Nov 8 2010, 10:57 AM)
How did you use the SB900 till it overheats? Granted I dont have an SB900, but I use SB800s with 5 batts a lot, and have never, ever gotten it to overheat in the past 4 years...
*
SB-800 don't have such issue because it don't come with temperature control IIRC.
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 11:14 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
55-200 faster, smaller aperture tongue.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 11:16 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
^85mm tomorrow get ah ? laugh.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 11:21 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 8 2010, 11:18 AM)
If it arrives tomorrow, then yes! Need to hunt for filters, this Heng quoted me RM270 for Hoya HD and RM3++ for XS-Pro.  doh.gif
*
sweat.gif expensive shit !
85mm still 4600 ? blink.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 11:24 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Nowadays even ISO 3200 I also shoot liao. tongue.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 01:21 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 8 2010, 12:16 PM)
Enough exposure 3200 ISO not too bad geh.. haha!
*
brows.gif

QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 12:47 PM)
wow! ISO 1000 I start to feel scared liao. tongue.gif
*
In wedding, moments is the most important things. Noise ? Forget about it. Client only want the moments. The noise when print out, I see nothing.
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 01:40 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 01:39 PM)
What kind of media do you usually print out for your clients? I planned to print my best collections into a book or something, rather than just storing my pics digitally.
*
I send to my supplier shop. wink.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 04:36 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
The flower can look better than this.
And why the hell f/25 ? shocking.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 05:09 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 04:47 PM)
isn't it using smaller aperture can make the things sharp a bit?
sorry for stupid question here..please forgive as well i'm a newbie in photograph. = )
*
My lens, mostly wide open aperture also sharp wor tongue.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 06:04 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(zackskate666 @ Nov 8 2010, 05:12 PM)
that is a different level of lens compared with the 18-105 kit lens lor.. sweat.gif
*
tongue.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 8 2010, 05:22 PM)
LOL... 70200 35 50? All the primes and pro zoom wor... haha!
*
11-16, 18-70 (yesh, this sharp even at wide open !!) 35, 70200

QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 05:35 PM)
haha..
your lens is different i think..
by the way, what shutter speed and aperture should i set if i'm using M to shoot flower?
*
Different ah ? F mount also ma blush.gif

QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 05:45 PM)
Ishh..... Today I see another poison from KTCY again.. tongue.gif

So tempted to buy a prime... brows.gif
*
Buy buy buy !!

QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 05:50 PM)
*already in my next buying list, saving for it* tongue.gif
*
Sold off my 1.4D luuu tongue.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 06:31 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 06:14 PM)
haha..
maybe my problem..
still got to learn..
*
Actually got different la tongue.gif

QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 8 2010, 06:15 PM)
@KTCY

Can see the difference between 18-70 & 16-85 in terms of shapness and overall? hmm.gif
*
VR and without VR, the most obvious different.
Sharpness, I find it same or maybe 16-85 slightly, yes very slightly better.
Overall ? I get 18-70 as value for money. and at 70mm, 16-85 already f/5.6 if compare to 18-70 only f/4.5 flex.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 06:38 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
24-70 for me. 14-24 too wide tongue.gif
KTCY
post Nov 8 2010, 07:15 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM)
Oic..
thanks for the information again ya..sifu... ^^

Added on November 8, 2010, 7:03 pm

Okay..thx sifu ya..^^

Added on November 8, 2010, 7:04 pm
hehe..
different is i only got 20% of knowledge, but maybe you know all the knowledge about slr camera.
*
I still learning also blush.gif
KTCY
post Nov 9 2010, 08:27 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
18-200 good for travelling but daily use, 16-85 anytime biggrin.gif
KTCY
post Nov 9 2010, 11:19 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Nov 9 2010, 10:59 AM)
comparing nikon 17-55 wif tamron 17-50...
is d quality different alot...?
coz wana see izit worthy to get nikon for extra 2.5k...
thx for all d sifu advice...
*
YESH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELL LOT !!! TAMRON color very dull

p/s : You still non stop gear hunting huh ? And photos ? laugh.gif
KTCY
post Nov 9 2010, 01:26 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 12:19 PM)
I heard most people discussed about Tammy. Any Sigma users? Is it good?
*
Sigma 18-50 not bad. Cheap and good. 1.9k

QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 12:21 PM)
Because Tammy is more affordable. Heard that Sigma is better for the 17-50 2.8, but 1k more expensive smile.gif
*
18-50 is more ex around few hundred only

QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 9 2010, 12:58 PM)
lets include tokina also in the discussion...
*
16-50 flex.gif

Anyway whistling.gif


This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 9 2010, 06:17 PM
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0788sec    0.43    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 09:06 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.