v10 already.
This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 6 2010, 10:55 PM
Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 10:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
11th
v10 already. This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 6 2010, 10:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2010, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 7 2010, 08:21 PM) If the word "Nikon" and "D700" both in focus then that's gonna be awesome, but then, both of them not at the same depth, unless you set a smaller aperture Spam some nature pic first » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 7 2010, 09:10 PM |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 12:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 01:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 8 2010, 01:21 PM) In wedding, moments is the most important things. Noise ? Forget about it. Client only want the moments. The noise when print out, I see nothing. |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 05:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 06:02 PM) If you want good-looking DOF, try to open up the aperture the max (smallest f-stop number, e.g. 3.5-5.6 on the kitlens) your lens can handle, then compensate the exposure with the shutter speed. Slower shutter speed more light, and Faster shutter speed means darker. Slower shutter speed also more prone to camera shake, if got VR, should be OK, but still will shake. Best if you use tripod.After taking, look at your camera histogram for more accurate results on the exposure. If the blocks are more towards left, then your pic is underexposed (too dark). Otherwise your pic is overexposed (too bright). If all block towards center, then the exposure is good. I got cheated by the LCD screen many times already. Thought it's OK on the camera, but when display in my computer, some looked very dark... This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 8 2010, 06:12 PM |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 06:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
best is you can have a nice hill shape in the histogram, not skewing too much to either side. That means the dark areas and light areas are balanced.
But sometimes the histogram tells a subjective reading. Just use it as a reference only. |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 06:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM) Oic.. Haha please dun call me sifu...paiseh paiseh... Just sharing info only. I still have lots to learn.thanks for the information again ya..sifu... ^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:03 pm Okay..thx sifu ya..^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:09 pm QUOTE(Klesk @ Nov 8 2010, 07:00 PM) Guise i rarely post my pictars here coz i think i'm not up to the standard. Even though not sharp, but the dreamy look of the pic looked cute. The girl looked sweet too. Interesting concept of using a toy and the girl as subject.shot using 50 mm 1.8D » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 8 2010, 07:09 PM |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
If the photos were arranged in this sequence:
3 -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It can make up a short story by itself. This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 8 2010, 08:45 PM |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 08:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 08:44 AM) I can see the depth of field there is quite shallow. So, your focusing has to be quite precise. I'm not sure what shutter speed you are using and focal length. The longer you zoom at the pic, the more prone it can get camera shake. General rule of thumb if possible is to have your shutter speed faster than your focal length. E.g. If you zoom at 85mm then your shutter speed should be faster than 1/80s, maybe 1/100s and above. Another thing if possible is to get ample lighting. Your pic will look slightly sharper if the lighting is good. I think you have to fine tune the focus a bit more. In a condition where depth of field is too shallow, you have to take more pics with diff focus adjustments, if you're manual. I understand sometimes autofocus may not do its job well under high magnification. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 09:58 AM) But if i used shutter speed 1/80s or 1/100s the picture will get darker.. 0.62s? Your surrounding must be very dark! Try to experiment with higher ISO like what celciuz mentioned. Or otherwise, find somewhere with better lighting. the exposure time of this photo is 0.62sec... Added on November 9, 2010, 10:08 am QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:04 AM) if i didn't guess wrongly..you took the shot while placing the camera on the floor? why bursting the shots can help? bursting your shots might help as well. =D This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 9 2010, 10:08 AM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 10:13 AM) should add use lower shutter speed, and burst the shots. bursting might give u a higher chance of getting sharp shots That's why have to take multiple shots of different focus adjustments, take one, move the focus ring slightly, take another, then pick the best pic, just my ideas lar.then again, if you focus manually, the subject not in 100% focus, u burst gao gao also won't help. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:41 AM) Allright. smallest possible f-stop number (e.g. f/3.5), largest aperture opening. In layman terms, buka mata besar besar!! Added on November 9, 2010, 10:42 am Ya..i place my camera on the floor.. by the way, what is bursting my shoot? Added on November 9, 2010, 10:43 am en.. Added on November 9, 2010, 10:45 amSo, for the summary is...when in dark place, use higher ISO and smaller aperture ( with large number) is it? This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 9 2010, 11:04 AM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 12:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
I heard most people discussed about Tammy. Any Sigma users? Is it good?
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,180 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: *awaiting GPS accuracy* |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0316sec
0.78
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:18 PM |