Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
|
geekster129
|
Nov 8 2010, 06:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Nov 8 2010, 06:32 PM) So guys, what's your dream lens at the moment ? Like a particular lens that u really want it but can't get it without saving kau kau ?  Mine would be nikkor 14-24mm.  I wanted to collect the trinity at the moment. Haha...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klesk
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:00 PM
|
|
Guise i rarely post my pictars here coz i think i'm not up to the standard.  ...but i'm looking to improve my shots. so please give constructive c n c. Thanks shot using 50 mm 1.8D  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Klesk: Nov 8 2010, 07:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 8 2010, 06:54 PM) Reminds me of a photo where a photog carrying a lot a lot of lens + bodies attached. LONG and HUGE lens... He has to hire a caddy already. Instead of carrying golf clubs, carry lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIEN18
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 06:24 PM) best is you can have a nice hill shape in the histogram, not skewing too much to either side. That means the dark areas and light areas are balanced. But sometimes the histogram tells a subjective reading. Just use it as a reference only. Oic.. thanks for the information again ya..sifu... ^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:03 pmQUOTE(shinjun @ Nov 8 2010, 06:28 PM) Yes, but it also depends on your environment. If you in a controlled lighting environment, then most likely the exposure will be the same. Okay..thx sifu ya..^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:04 pmQUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 8 2010, 06:31 PM) Actually got different la  hehe.. different is i only got 20% of knowledge, but maybe you know all the knowledge about slr camera. This post has been edited by KIEN18: Nov 8 2010, 07:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM) Oic.. thanks for the information again ya..sifu... ^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:03 pmOkay..thx sifu ya..^^ Haha please dun call me sifu...paiseh paiseh... Just sharing info only. I still have lots to learn. Added on November 8, 2010, 7:09 pmQUOTE(Klesk @ Nov 8 2010, 07:00 PM) Guise i rarely post my pictars here coz i think i'm not up to the standard.  ...but i'm looking to improve my shots. so please give constructive c n c. Thanks shot using 50 mm 1.8D » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Even though not sharp, but the dreamy look of the pic looked cute. The girl looked sweet too. Interesting concept of using a toy and the girl as subject. This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 8 2010, 07:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klesk
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:11 PM
|
|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:05 PM) Haha please dun call me sifu...paiseh paiseh... Just sharing info only. I still have lots to learn. Added on November 8, 2010, 7:09 pmEven though not sharp, but the dreamy look of the pic looked cute. The girl looked sweet too. Interesting concept of using a toy and the girl as subject. yeah thanks. it's her idea actually. so you reckon shooting at higher aperture value could improve image sharpness? Any other way to achieve it other than getting a new lens hehe.. i don think you could sharpen much during post processing right, i could be wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
KTCY
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KIEN18 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:02 PM) Oic.. thanks for the information again ya..sifu... ^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:03 pmOkay..thx sifu ya..^^ Added on November 8, 2010, 7:04 pmhehe.. different is i only got 20% of knowledge, but maybe you know all the knowledge about slr camera. I still learning also
|
|
|
|
|
|
8sg9ft
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:24 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 8 2010, 06:31 PM) Actually got different la  VR and without VR, the most obvious different. Sharpness, I find it same or maybe 16-85 slightly, yes very slightly better. Overall ? I get 18-70 as value for money. and at 70mm, 16-85 already f/5.6 if compare to 18-70 only f/4.5  Oh, i see. But it's so hard to look for a 2nd hand 18-70. Thinking to sell my 18-105 and either buying 16-85 which is slightly expensive for me or the 18-70 which is definitely affordable. But 18-70 no VR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIEN18
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:27 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:05 PM) Haha please dun call me sifu...paiseh paiseh... Just sharing info only. I still have lots to learn.
at least you're better than me... haha Added on November 8, 2010, 7:28 pmQUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 8 2010, 07:15 PM) I still learning also  ya.. same same here..hahahahaha... Added on November 8, 2010, 7:29 pmBy the way, can add my name ah as D90 user too? This post has been edited by KIEN18: Nov 8 2010, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSGeneral_Nic
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Nov 8 2010, 06:32 PM) So guys, what's your dream lens at the moment ? Like a particular lens that u really want it but can't get it without saving kau kau ?  Mine would be nikkor 14-24mm.  limit to 1 lens oni or any amount? if no limit i want all but 1st choice 24 f/1.4, 2nd 85 f/1.4G QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Nov 8 2010, 06:51 PM) Will definitely look like commando if u bring all at once.  go look at Viking when he carry all his gears
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isepunye
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 8 2010, 07:33 AM) I burst a lot with my SB900 during runways, but never did read the thermal cut before. Heck even when the temp doesn't go to the middle bar  . During the event where I shoot the bridals, many SB900 reached thermal cut. Those uncle was like putting stofen and bouncing to ceiling/backwards. LOL, its a ballroom man... So it depends how you use it. i hardly get overheat with my SB900. last event i was bursting SB900 with continuous (H mode) shutter with D300 body. still have no issue. out of 15, it all fired nice and balance. just about middle only.... >< the one i hardly burst with my SB600. damn slow recharge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ComradeZ
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Klesk @ Nov 8 2010, 07:00 PM) Guise i rarely post my pictars here coz i think i'm not up to the standard.  ...but i'm looking to improve my shots. so please give constructive c n c. Thanks shot using 50 mm 1.8D » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « you talk crap sir, the photos are fine. Though... i reckon sharpen abit details onto the subject then again.. it is just me... other than that... nice pictures  P/S: then again... I've seen too many photos too sharp anyway... yours, I could say story > IQ This post has been edited by ComradeZ: Nov 8 2010, 07:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isepunye
|
Nov 8 2010, 07:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Klesk @ Nov 8 2010, 07:00 PM) Guise i rarely post my pictars here coz i think i'm not up to the standard.  ...but i'm looking to improve my shots. so please give constructive c n c. Thanks shot using 50 mm 1.8D  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « the are nice. ur tone and soft image makes it feel more dreamy and lovely feeling. 1st i thnk its better the box thng look at her + ask her leg to fit in the frame. 2nd pict IMO need lower angle. trust me it much better but sacrifice la u need to lie down 3rd u already OOF. nose sharper then eyes but hey for fun rite? it still usable. even wedding photo i always OOF for the outside spoiler picture, why not sharp at box face instead of above side?
|
|
|
|
|
|
FaezFarhan
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:27 PM
|
|
*removed*
This post has been edited by FaezFarhan: Nov 10 2010, 01:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:35 PM
|
|
If the photos were arranged in this sequence: 3 -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It can make up a short story by itself. This post has been edited by geekster129: Nov 8 2010, 08:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
FaezFarhan
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 8 2010, 08:35 PM) I totally agree with you bro, If the photos were arranged in this sequence: 3 -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It can make up a short story by itself.  Last pic = new friends Btw, since the expected price of D7000 body looking good so far and since I'm not planning to go FX anytime soon, my soon-to-be gears I guess  =  D7000 + 16-85 This post has been edited by FaezFarhan: Nov 8 2010, 08:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isepunye
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:47 PM
|
|
faez i thnk its weird left only cloth and shoes color. product shot? haha anyway spam spam from SACC wedding fair This post has been edited by Isepunye: Nov 8 2010, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
FaezFarhan
|
Nov 8 2010, 09:00 PM
|
|
^ Yeah to make it look something like product shot instead of a boring self-potrait
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIEN18
|
Nov 8 2010, 10:16 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Just now i do this..  f/8 ISO-250
|
|
|
|
|
|
8sg9ft
|
Nov 8 2010, 11:11 PM
|
|
^ What was the shutter speed? Doesn't look sharply focused for me. And also the picture a bit underexposed lo. Maybe bump up the ISO a little? Pic spam? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by 8sg9ft: Nov 8 2010, 11:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|