we always login this forum digging into the threads we like hoping to see more info about cars, but i was let down by almost 3 pages of trolling & pointless arguement in this crz thread.
there are hundreds or thousands of ppl who are passionate in the car come here to share thier interest, we are not here to spend precious time reading all your childish act.
no wonder all the hardcore car enthusiasts leave lyn to join zerotohundred. all we left here are mostly kids trashing in /k/ or gaming forum and come to F&F talk about cars acting like they know it all.
well, stop talking about advance tech like ceramic brakes, i bet 99% of those who talk like a pro cant even tell the fondamental stuff like what differ between brake fluid dot3, 4, and 5 without googling.
enuf said
i dunno man...i find these kind of thread entertaining. almost /k like excitement.
i wonder if it is still worthwhile sharing opinion in this thread after all these bashing...
anyway, test drove the car, being a candidate together with the Polo 1.2 TSI to replace the boring MPV i drive to work day in & out. Main consideration is the price of 110k range that I can afford and fuel saving.
CR-Z definitely a nice looking car. I've come to like the design a lot. Interior looks good with a good strike of balance. Polo 1.2 TSI pales in the sense the dial is boring. The car gives a firm driving feel. while enough for city driving, it leaves people wanting more power from a supposed sporty hot-hatch like this. The sports mode's throttle respond, to me, feels a bit fake. You get the added throttle respond sound with more fuel fed in I guess, but the car doesn't accelerate as fast as it sounds =_=
anyway, generally I think there is some point to like the CR-Z with its current price point, practicallity aside. Of course I would have like it to be priced nearer to insight or maybe RM105k would be good. But if it wasn't for the hybrid with the tax cut, at a higher price point, I want my usual Honda Type R feed from this car! else its nothing but failure