QUOTE(enCORe @ Sep 27 2010, 09:37 AM)
benny
u say Galaxy is inferior than HD2 android built ?
Finally getting HD2 last Saturday

, running with Dutty dela creme rom. Im still testing with multiple android built, When Darkstone built performance was good, but unable to connect WIFI and unable to use 'menu' key function,
next will testing the daniel version
YES. On both nexus n hd2 android, file access and program launch is almost instant while in Galaxy S it takes about 1 to 2 sec to launch program. File acess using say ASTRO file manger takes up to 3to 5 secs.
Once program launched, performance is ok. The problem is galaxy s uses a in build flash drive to store programs, it is slower to read it. It reminds me of the doped u1000 which uses a unbuilt flash drive. However I mange to improve it by installing a lag fix which changes the galaxy s file structure creating a ext2 partition to store the programs. Is only a temporary solution, and hopefully it's froyo version will improve it. I have tried some leaked unofficial froyo versions, improvement is marginal.
If you compare it side by side with a nexus, desire or even hd2 android first thing you notice the scrolling smoothness of the galaxy s is the worst. I give it a score of 8 against the nexus, desire n hd2.
The problem of laggyness partly due to poor software of touchwiz ui is widely known and accepted by all galaxy s users but not publicized. The recommended solution is apply the lag fix, a procedure could brick your phone it not removed properly before install newer roms.galaxy s I summarized great hardware specs but poorly support with weak software implementation
This post has been edited by benny888: Sep 27 2010, 10:03 AM