QUOTE(reloaded @ Sep 4 2010, 09:07 PM)
wait for the replacement's spec announcement.. P/s: i waited for the replacement for over 1 month, so now i already grab the d90...
Nikon D90 V9, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
Sep 4 2010, 11:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: shah alam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,952 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
I prefer without the bar, cannot just snap without the bar inside? @_@ must PP one ar?
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 01:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Sep 4 2010, 10:18 PM) i think should wait. d3100 is pretty impressive. if im not mistake, D90 is nikon's best selling model...so replacement should be very2 worth it! lol...there will..or you could wait for Sigma to release its version of the 85mm f1.4 HSM...heard it will come with OS too...hehe...but so far, i like the 85mm f1.8 AF-D bokeh is pretty poisoness too...will there ever be an af-s 85mm f1.8G? a sample shot... =) 85mm in action...QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Sep 5 2010, 12:01 AM) what bar? |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 4 2010, 09:55 PM) yea man...haha...currently broke after i got this... How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 4 2010, 10:04 PM) ^ On second thought it seems the D3100 has equivalent ISO performance of D700/D3. Might as well see what D90 replacement can offer! Woah really? It's proven in reviews? |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 03:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,039 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Malaka |
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 4 2010, 09:55 PM) yea man...haha...currently broke after i got this... bro, how much da price for sigma 70-200?![]() @reloaded i feel tat you should just grab the d90 while you can..spend the time invest in good lens is better for a newer body...d90 is pretty good as it is...unless you wish to have higher mega pixel count, i suggest you just go grab 1..cause its selling like hot cakes now... |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 03:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 08:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM) Was playing with 85mm yesterday and right after that, it caused me insomnia LOL, the owner indeed posted that way. But then he mentioned due to 'lousy fax quality' so posted wrong price haha~I hate Nikon. Pricing wise below 4.5k Doubt so. Cost also over that already. Added on September 5, 2010, 8:25 am QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM) How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? Nope, don't have a in dept review yet. Still waiting for one to confirm, but images on the net shows that way.Woah really? It's proven in reviews? This post has been edited by celciuz: Sep 5 2010, 08:25 AM |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 10:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM) How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? haha..the 70-200 i mean like for the price you pay for its quite ok...its pretty sharp at 70mm f2.8...but when you zoomed pass the 135mm mark, it tends to be a lil soft..but no worries...stop to F3.5 and it should fix the softness..overall i love the built quality...Woah really? It's proven in reviews? QUOTE(ResQ @ Sep 5 2010, 03:13 AM) got it for rm2.7k bro... QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 03:35 AM) yea...definitely poor man's 2.8 telephoto...not every1 is as rich as celciuz.. This post has been edited by sidewinderz: Sep 5 2010, 11:28 PM |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 11:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 5 2010, 10:20 AM) haha..the 70-200 i mean like for the price you pay for its quite ok...its pretty sharp at 70mm f2.8...but when you zoomed pass the 135mm mark, it tends to be a lil soft..but no worries...stop to F3.5 and it should fix the softness..overall i love the built quality... Heh, this will temporary cure your itch for 70-200 VR. Last time I also bought a Nikon 80-200 F/2.8, thinking that it could cure the itch for 70-200 VR, turn out I was wrong got it for rm2.6k bro... yea...definitely poor man's 2.8 telephoto...not every1 is as rich as celciuz.. |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 11:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Sep 5 2010, 11:13 AM) Heh, this will temporary cure your itch for 70-200 VR. Last time I also bought a Nikon 80-200 F/2.8, thinking that it could cure the itch for 70-200 VR, turn out I was wrong hehe...stay away you evil evil person.... |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 12:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
i'm backk!! been a while. haha.
thinking of getting the 24-120 f/4. but from the looks of it, it'll cost around RM5k Added on September 5, 2010, 12:56 pmbtw, for those who remembered me asking, i got my spanner wrench it was worth it though. i managed to CLA my 135mm Steinheil but the 40 year old fungus etch marks were permanent. This post has been edited by ifaaan: Sep 5 2010, 12:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 01:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,677 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Pills & Thrills |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM) Was playing with 85mm yesterday and right after that, it caused me insomnia 1 thing i dont like bout 85 is no vr. with d price rm4.6k, nikon shud hv put vr in d latest model. i dont mind wt no nano...I hate Nikon. Pricing wise below 4.5k Doubt so. Cost also over that already. |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 02:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 02:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 02:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Well, I guess so. But adding VR in will add in weight as well as $$$.
|
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
50 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
can someone kindly advise me the pro's/con's of getting a d90 over the newer canon 550d?
i was leaning towards the d90, but from shopkeepers they say the 550d is more worth it. video mode is better, canon lens cheaper and service better. in terms of photography, i hear the d90 is probably slightly better, but by how much? suppose to be better in lowlight conditions? i understand that the d90 is aimed at prosumer ppl while the 550d is more beginner-dslr, what makes this so? would it mean d90 has more configuration or better specs? i currently use a 450d and will sell it, just deciding between d90 and 550d. |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 06:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
375 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: /k/ |
@celciuz
just now i surf around your flickr, and saw a lot portrait shots. does those model you find are your friend or you invite 1? and if you invite 1 model, it will be how much |
|
|
Sep 5 2010, 06:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: KL |
QUOTE(damachee @ Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM) shopkeepers say the 550d is more worth it. video mode is better, canon lens cheaper and service better. Heard this from some too but didn't really buy the idea personally. Cos I sudah kena D90 poison.QUOTE(damachee @ Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM) Entry-level upgrading to entry-level?If that's the case isn't it better jump to D90, or if must jump-ship but same level - D3100, or dowan jump-ship but upgrading why not 50D, 60D or better yet full frame? My post might not have answered the pros and cons question but I'm merely contributing tiny 2 cents of mine =) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.46
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:42 AM |