Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nikon D90 V9, Nikon mid-high range DSLR

views
     
faareast
post Sep 4 2010, 11:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: shah alam


QUOTE(reloaded @ Sep 4 2010, 09:07 PM)
Hi everyone,

Is worth waiting for the D90 replacement or just grab the D90?

Please advise.
*
wait for the replacement's spec announcement..


P/s: i waited for the replacement for over 1 month, so now i already grab the d90... blush.gif
SkyBlue99
post Sep 5 2010, 12:01 AM

Look at all their stars!! Not Mine!!
******
Senior Member
1,952 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 4 2010, 07:25 PM)
Remove what? The bar?
*
yeah the bar
celciuz
post Sep 5 2010, 12:07 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I prefer without the bar, cannot just snap without the bar inside? @_@ must PP one ar?
sidewinderz
post Sep 5 2010, 01:20 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Sep 4 2010, 10:18 PM)
i think should wait. d3100 is pretty impressive. if im not mistake, D90 is nikon's best selling model...so replacement should be very2 worth it!

will there ever be an af-s 85mm f1.8G? sad.gif 4k is way too expensive
*
lol...there will..or you could wait for Sigma to release its version of the 85mm f1.4 HSM...heard it will come with OS too...hehe...but so far, i like the 85mm f1.8 AF-D bokeh is pretty poisoness too...

user posted image a sample shot... =) 85mm in action...

QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Sep 5 2010, 12:01 AM)
yeah the bar
*
what bar? rclxub.gif
FaezFarhan
post Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM

United till I die!
*******
Senior Member
3,435 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kota Bharu



QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 4 2010, 09:55 PM)
yea man...haha...currently broke after i got this...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
*
How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? smile.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 4 2010, 10:04 PM)
^ On second thought it seems the D3100 has equivalent ISO performance of D700/D3. Might as well see what D90 replacement can offer!
*
Woah really? It's proven in reviews? hmm.gif
ResQ
post Sep 5 2010, 03:13 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,039 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Malaka



QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 4 2010, 09:55 PM)
yea man...haha...currently broke after i got this...

user posted image

@reloaded

i feel tat you should just grab the d90 while you can..spend the time invest in good lens is better for a newer body...d90 is pretty good as it is...unless you wish to have higher mega pixel count, i suggest you just go grab 1..cause its selling like hot cakes now...
*
bro, how much da price for sigma 70-200?
FaezFarhan
post Sep 5 2010, 03:35 AM

United till I die!
*******
Senior Member
3,435 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kota Bharu



QUOTE(ResQ @ Sep 5 2010, 03:13 AM)
bro, how much da price for sigma 70-200?
*
Haha I just asked him above your post. Poor man's 2.8 telephoto biggrin.gif
KTCY
post Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Was playing with 85mm yesterday and right after that, it caused me insomnia sad.gif

I hate Nikon. Pricing wise below 4.5k brows.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 4 2010, 11:38 AM)
Wala, just saw a shop selling 85mm f/1.4G for RM4150!!!
*
Doubt so. Cost also over that already.
celciuz
post Sep 5 2010, 08:25 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM)
Was playing with 85mm yesterday and right after that, it caused me insomnia sad.gif

I hate Nikon. Pricing wise below 4.5k brows.gif
Doubt so. Cost also over that already.
*
LOL, the owner indeed posted that way. But then he mentioned due to 'lousy fax quality' so posted wrong price haha~


Added on September 5, 2010, 8:25 am
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM)
How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? smile.gif
Woah really? It's proven in reviews? hmm.gif
*
Nope, don't have a in dept review yet. Still waiting for one to confirm, but images on the net shows that way.

This post has been edited by celciuz: Sep 5 2010, 08:25 AM
sidewinderz
post Sep 5 2010, 10:20 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 02:25 AM)
How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw? smile.gif
Woah really? It's proven in reviews? hmm.gif
*
haha..the 70-200 i mean like for the price you pay for its quite ok...its pretty sharp at 70mm f2.8...but when you zoomed pass the 135mm mark, it tends to be a lil soft..but no worries...stop to F3.5 and it should fix the softness..overall i love the built quality...

QUOTE(ResQ @ Sep 5 2010, 03:13 AM)
bro, how much da price for sigma 70-200?
*
got it for rm2.7k bro... laugh.gif

QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 5 2010, 03:35 AM)
Haha I just asked him above your post. Poor man's 2.8 telephotoĀ  biggrin.gif
*
yea...definitely poor man's 2.8 telephoto...not every1 is as rich as celciuz.. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by sidewinderz: Sep 5 2010, 11:28 PM
Bliz
post Sep 5 2010, 11:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 5 2010, 10:20 AM)
haha..the 70-200 i mean like for the price you pay for its quite ok...its pretty sharp at 70mm f2.8...but when you zoomed pass the 135mm mark, it tends to be a lil soft..but no worries...stop to F3.5 and it should fix the softness..overall i love the built quality...
got it for rm2.6k bro... laugh.gif
yea...definitely poor man's 2.8 telephoto...not every1 is as rich as celciuz..  whistling.gif
*
Heh, this will temporary cure your itch for 70-200 VR. Last time I also bought a Nikon 80-200 F/2.8, thinking that it could cure the itch for 70-200 VR, turn out I was wrong whistling.gif
sidewinderz
post Sep 5 2010, 11:58 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(Bliz @ Sep 5 2010, 11:13 AM)
Heh, this will temporary cure your itch for 70-200 VR. Last time I also bought a Nikon 80-200 F/2.8, thinking that it could cure the itch for 70-200 VR, turn out I was wrong  whistling.gif
*
hehe...stay away you evil evil person.... rolleyes.gif rolleyes.gif but yea...eventually would move to nikon...but for now at least my lens collection is pretty complete...just improve what i have on right now before moving on... wink.gif
ifaaan
post Sep 5 2010, 12:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
i'm backk!! been a while. haha.

thinking of getting the 24-120 f/4. but from the looks of it, it'll cost around RM5k cry.gif


Added on September 5, 2010, 12:56 pmbtw, for those who remembered me asking, i got my spanner wrench biggrin.gif LOL. had to buy it off ebay and it was RM140 for the one with removable heads.

it was worth it though. i managed to CLA my 135mm Steinheil but the 40 year old fungus etch marks were permanent. sad.gif oh well.

This post has been edited by ifaaan: Sep 5 2010, 12:56 PM
bad melatonin
post Sep 5 2010, 01:01 PM

Insomnia
******
Senior Member
1,677 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Pills & Thrills


QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 5 2010, 07:18 AM)
Was playing with 85mm yesterday and right after that, it caused me insomnia sad.gif

I hate Nikon. Pricing wise below 4.5k brows.gif
Doubt so. Cost also over that already.
*
1 thing i dont like bout 85 is no vr. with d price rm4.6k, nikon shud hv put vr in d latest model. i dont mind wt no nano...
KTCY
post Sep 5 2010, 02:48 PM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(bad melatonin @ Sep 5 2010, 01:01 PM)
1 thing i dont like bout 85 is no vr. with d price rm4.6k, nikon shud hv put vr in d latest model. i dont mind wt no nano...
*
Why need VR at that range ? Big aperture is fast enough smile.gif
razuryza
post Sep 5 2010, 02:50 PM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 5 2010, 02:48 PM)
Why need VR at that range ? Big aperture is fast enough smile.gif
*
not everytime we need big aperture what....
KTCY
post Sep 5 2010, 02:53 PM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Well, I guess so. But adding VR in will add in weight as well as $$$.
damachee
post Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


can someone kindly advise me the pro's/con's of getting a d90 over the newer canon 550d?

i was leaning towards the d90, but from shopkeepers they say the 550d is more worth it. video mode is better, canon lens cheaper and service better.
in terms of photography, i hear the d90 is probably slightly better, but by how much? suppose to be better in lowlight conditions?
i understand that the d90 is aimed at prosumer ppl while the 550d is more beginner-dslr, what makes this so? would it mean d90 has more configuration or better specs?
i currently use a 450d and will sell it, just deciding between d90 and 550d.
jobneed
post Sep 5 2010, 06:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: /k/


@celciuz
just now i surf around your flickr, and saw a lot portrait shots.
does those model you find are your friend or you invite 1?
and if you invite 1 model, it will be how much
stsh90
post Sep 5 2010, 06:28 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
824 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: KL


QUOTE(damachee @ Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM)
shopkeepers say the 550d is more worth it. video mode is better, canon lens cheaper and service better.
*
Heard this from some too but didn't really buy the idea personally. Cos I sudah kena D90 poison.

QUOTE(damachee @ Sep 5 2010, 04:49 PM)
i currently use a 450d and will sell it, just deciding between d90 and 550d.
*
Entry-level upgrading to entry-level?

If that's the case isn't it better jump to D90, or if must jump-ship but same level - D3100, or dowan jump-ship but upgrading why not 50D, 60D or better yet full frame?

My post might not have answered the pros and cons question but I'm merely contributing tiny 2 cents of mine =)

126 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0188sec    0.46    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:42 AM