Wahh new thread. Btw i'm joining MMU this october. Saw a lot of MMU students from the last thread. Can go outing meh?

Haha Don't worry bro when I go there we'll try to organize an outing or TT

Cyber. From LKW to MMU

Nano Coating will improve the dealing with CA I guess

How much did u get it for bro? Sigma 70-200 2.8. How's the quality btw?

Woah really? It's proven in reviews?

Haha I just asked him above your post. Poor man's 2.8 telephoto

Guys, I always wonder. Why bokeh is better of FX body? Is it because of the sensor?

Ohh yea forgot Thanks for the explaination sifu. Haha

Meaning 100mm bokeh on FX equals 70mm bokeh on DX. Right?

It's either SB650 or SB700. They haven't decided the name, or it's just a guess. Nikon haven't released the official name yet. Like D90's replacement last time, D95 and D7000

See even this pakcik is waiting for the D7000

I bought the ori grip from my friend last time. His camera displays low battery sign even with 2 batteries charged full. So he went to nikon and they said that the connector on his camera is faulty.

Then he sold it to me for Rm400 after using it for a short time, just like new. And the same thing happened. Gave it back to him, and he went to Nikon again. Now they're gonna replace it with a new one, but no stock now.

Hate using my camera without the grip. My hand is too big I guess. LOL

I'm loving my 1750 non vc so far

Guys, heard so many comments regarding the Tammy 17-50. What's the main thing that you don't like the most? Build quality? Other than that? So for I'm loving my 17-50 non-VC. No problem yet but I've experienced back-focusing before. Sharpness also very good for my likings

Thinking of selling my Tammy 17-50 2.8 & 50 1.4 to get a 24-120 N. Good choice? Thinking only lor, not serious yet

The strap I think. Focusing the lens would be better for me

Me too. Hopefully it will be under RM1k

Why not the new 55-300?

Depends on the lighting. Use the smallest F number(meaning bigger aperture) and not too low on the shutter speed or your pic will be blurry. Bump the ISO up a bit. I think it's better for you to use A or S mode, then you will get the idea of which setting to use

Woman-version of the Undertaker, chokeslam!

Will it be weird if I buy a 24-120 f4 for my D90? Feeling lazy to swap lenses. Might consider selling my Tammy 17-50, 50 f1.4, and 55-200

Not really tempted by the 18-200 though. How's the performance of it? Good? Any other alternatives?


This post has been edited by FaezFarhan: Oct 23 2010, 04:29 AM

Anyone using Nikkor 18-200 VRII? Btw, is it sharper than Tammy 17-50 f2.8?