Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

56 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Core i7 LGA1366 & X58 Overclocking V2, Discussion, Benchmarks, Stabilty, Guides

views
     
BigSaver
post Jan 5 2011, 09:46 AM

v(^_^)V
******
Senior Member
1,029 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Earth


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 3 2011, 12:57 PM)
Sandy Bridge, heard 5GHz on air is easy at winter countries.
2600K vs 950, clock to clock 2600K wins for sure. 950 n other Bloomies are real dead now. 6 cores Gulftown is the only which can survive in 1366 platform, but still pricey.
My price for Sandy would be abt RM50 cheaper than shops only.
1155 is using the exactly the same ram as previous platforms, rated at 1.5-1.65v, dual channel.
*
Bro,if say an OC-ed i7 950 4ghz vs i7 2600k 4ghz,is it sandy still shining in term of performance?cant find any review regarding this matter.
monsh
post Jan 5 2011, 10:19 AM

Let's Change The World !
*******
Senior Member
4,196 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


from benchmark seems like its better but game performance wise from what i can see it seems like the difference is negligible cause only around 5 FPS increment .
gotta wait for more review .
but it seems like the sandy bridge is not really OC frenly based on the reviews .
can only play with the multiplier and the BCLK increment might not even exceed 10%
and review said only P67 chipset can play around in BIOS .
the H67 doesnt allow it .

dont flame me but this is what i read from review >.<"

lichyetan
post Jan 5 2011, 10:22 AM

*****
*******
Senior Member
2,295 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Penang



QUOTE(monsh @ Jan 5 2011, 10:19 AM)
from benchmark seems like its better but game performance wise from what i can see it seems like the difference is negligible cause only around 5 FPS increment .
gotta wait for more review .
but it seems like the sandy bridge is not really OC frenly based on the reviews .
can only play with the multiplier and the BCLK increment might not even exceed 10%
and review said only P67 chipset can play around in BIOS .
the H67 doesnt allow it .

dont flame me but this is what i read from review >.<"
*
the architecture is completely different, but its a bit dull if only can play with multiplier. Still waiting for more reviews and user comments though laugh.gif
monsh
post Jan 5 2011, 10:27 AM

Let's Change The World !
*******
Senior Member
4,196 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


yeap its too dull that it doesn't make it interesting to play with new playform although it has better performance .

aih, any news on when will LGA2011 will be released ?
that enthusiast platform should let OCer play around with the BIOS settings man .

else, it wont be nice .
metsatsu
post Jan 5 2011, 11:46 AM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(monsh @ Jan 5 2011, 10:19 AM)
from benchmark seems like its better but game performance wise from what i can see it seems like the difference is negligible cause only around 5 FPS increment .
gotta wait for more review .
but it seems like the sandy bridge is not really OC frenly based on the reviews .
can only play with the multiplier and the BCLK increment might not even exceed 10%
and review said only P67 chipset can play around in BIOS .
the H67 doesnt allow it .

dont flame me but this is what i read from review >.<"
*
if it's a heavily gpu dependable game, even a few fps is considered a good gain already.

now the sandy bridge bclk feels like pcie frequency. very rigid
kolong
post Jan 5 2011, 11:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Borneo HeadHunterz



hi guys..

everybody busy for lga1155.. i read the reviews n seems tempting..

my oc till 4.3Ghz.. hard to make it stable at 210 bclk.. any idea?

below my setting for 209 only..

Attached Image
sup3rfly
post Jan 5 2011, 12:58 PM

Techno Slave
******
Senior Member
1,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 秋葉原電気街


sandy should be quite boring for now... for the meantime i will keep my gulfy and wait for z68 and x68 lol...
TSowikh84
post Jan 5 2011, 03:42 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(metsatsu @ Jan 5 2011, 11:46 AM)
if it's a heavily gpu dependable game, even a few fps is considered a good gain already.
now the sandy bridge bclk feels like pcie frequency. very rigid
*
QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Jan 5 2011, 12:58 PM)
sandy should be quite boring for now... for the meantime i will keep my gulfy and wait for z68 and x68 lol...
*
Agree with u guys. Without BCLK tweaking Sandy overclocking is such a bore. Less playability no fun.
metsatsu
post Jan 5 2011, 04:13 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(kolong @ Jan 5 2011, 11:58 AM)
hi guys..

everybody busy for lga1155.. i read the reviews n seems tempting..

my oc till 4.3Ghz.. hard to make it stable at 210 bclk.. any idea?

below my setting for 209 only..

Attached Image
*
your screenshot provides too little info about your oc setting, don't even know what's the problem. do post in with cpu tweaker and cpuz (ram, mobo info etc)
kolong
post Jan 5 2011, 05:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Borneo HeadHunterz



i read sandy's oc guide from XS n found dat they recommended to keep C1E and EIST option enabled for the best overclock capability.. btw,i read sumwhere said dat sandy's K processor can do 4.9Ghz on air.. huiiyoo.. n sweet spot for Vcore will be 1.45~1.55.. but no review up yet so we cant say anything bout sandy atm..

p/s: bro mets,i will try post some info 2nite..

This post has been edited by kolong: Jan 5 2011, 05:19 PM
selfdz87
post Jan 5 2011, 05:42 PM

~5Ghz+ Club~
*****
Senior Member
932 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Paris With Love



QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Jan 5 2011, 12:58 PM)
sandy should be quite boring for now... for the meantime i will keep my gulfy and wait for z68 and x68 lol...
*
yeah i also think like that....wait for x68...then i jump...
this so called "integrated graphics" is pain in the a** only... laugh.gif sleep.gif
i heard it will be release in mid year??izit true? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by selfdz87: Jan 5 2011, 05:43 PM
kolong
post Jan 5 2011, 06:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Borneo HeadHunterz



x68 = lga2011?

btw, bro mets n gurus,here setting for 4.4Ghz but cant make it stable..

ody vcore to 1.4++ still da same..

symptom = linx freezing n (some tweak i did laz nite but forgot) after 15loops bsod..

Attached Image
gn9746203
post Jan 5 2011, 06:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: May 2009
hey guys i am really new in overclock ~ it is such a waste i hav this rig but i stio oc it due to study ~ now i wanna do it again
so far i only able to oc my i7-950 to 3.7 ~ i need some guide to get over to 3.8 ~ when i try oc to 3.8 it sometimes can boot sometimes no ~
pls give me some guide which setting i need to play with especially those voltage thing thx ~

mobo: RE3 Rampage
CPU: i7-950
RAM : 2x 2G Corsair Gaming Ram 1333
GC : Sapphire HD 5850
user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by gn9746203: Jan 5 2011, 06:32 PM
metsatsu
post Jan 5 2011, 07:43 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(kolong @ Jan 5 2011, 06:25 PM)
x68 = lga2011?

btw, bro mets n gurus,here setting for 4.4Ghz but cant make it stable..

ody vcore to 1.4++ still da same..

symptom = linx freezing n (some tweak i did laz nite but forgot) after 15loops bsod..

Attached Image
*
try setting your tRCD to 9 and tRFC to 88. and most of all, I seriously don't think u need that much of QPI/DRAM volt (VTT) sometimes for certain procs, too much vtt can lead to instability. set it to 1.30v or 1.35v
TSowikh84
post Jan 5 2011, 11:40 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kolong @ Jan 5 2011, 11:58 AM)
hi guys..
everybody busy for lga1155.. i read the reviews n seems tempting..
my oc till 4.3Ghz.. hard to make it stable at 210 bclk.. any idea?
below my setting for 209 only..
*
Depends on what BSOD u got.
A bump on vcore, vdimm or lower VTT might help. 1.3x VTT is sufficient for that uncore.
Might try to play with PCIE 105Mhz, IOH 1.175v etc... ahh LinX failure could be many reasons.
Run memtest to check dram error, but for R3E I just let it auto except for the 9-9-9-x


Added on January 6, 2011, 12:01 am
QUOTE(gn9746203 @ Jan 5 2011, 06:30 PM)
hey guys i am really new in overclock ~ it is such a waste i hav this rig but i stio oc it due to study ~ now i wanna do it again
so far i only able to oc my i7-950 to 3.7 ~ i need some guide to get over to 3.8 ~ when i try oc to 3.8 it sometimes can boot sometimes no ~
pls give me some guide which setting i need to play with especially those voltage thing thx ~
mobo: RE3 Rampage
CPU: i7-950
RAM : 2x 2G Corsair Gaming Ram 1333
GC : Sapphire HD 5850
*
Nice try bro. U need to manually adjust vcore more than the current 1.15v, say 1.3v should be sweet for 3.8Ghz
vdimm set to 1.65v 1st, after this u might adjust lower for the most optimized one, say 1.6v.
QPI/RAM aka VTT set to 1.3x, for that uncore should be enough.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 6 2011, 12:01 AM
gn9746203
post Jan 6 2011, 12:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 5 2011, 11:40 PM)
Depends on what BSOD u got.
A bump on vcore, vdimm or lower VTT might help. 1.3x VTT is sufficient for that uncore.
Might try to play with PCIE 105Mhz, IOH 1.175v etc... ahh LinX failure could be many reasons.
Run memtest to check dram error, but for R3E I just let it auto except for the 9-9-9-x


Added on January 6, 2011, 12:01 am
Nice try bro. U need to manually adjust vcore more than the current 1.15v, say 1.3v should be sweet for 3.8Ghz
vdimm set to 1.65v 1st, after this u might adjust lower for the most optimized one, say 1.6v.
QPI/RAM aka VTT set to 1.3x, for that uncore should be enough.
*
thx bro ~ try it now


Added on January 6, 2011, 12:26 amlol bootmgr corrupted ~ looks like i need some time

This post has been edited by gn9746203: Jan 6 2011, 12:26 AM
sup3rfly
post Jan 6 2011, 12:56 AM

Techno Slave
******
Senior Member
1,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 秋葉原電気街


QUOTE(selfdz87 @ Jan 5 2011, 05:42 PM)
yeah i also think like that....wait for x68...then i jump...
this so called "integrated graphics" is pain in the a** only... laugh.gif  sleep.gif
i heard it will be release in mid year??izit true? hmm.gif
*
from what i heard, z68 shd be mid yr then x68 might be end of this yr or beginning of next year
gn9746203
post Jan 6 2011, 01:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: May 2009
erm ~ how to count the memory divider ? to get the desire dram frequency
TSowikh84
post Jan 6 2011, 03:13 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(gn9746203 @ Jan 6 2011, 01:05 PM)
erm ~ how to count the memory divider ? to get the desire dram frequency
*
Either 2:8 or 2:10 for BCLK:Ram

Let's say for 2:8 (or 1:4) default BCLK of 950 is 133Mhz
So 133:133mhzx4 is 133:533mhz effective dram freq for DDR3 is 533x2=1066mhz
U may say 133x8 ~1066mhz for 2:8
For 2:10, effective dram speed is 133x10 = 1333mhz
Hope this helps. biggrin.gif
gn9746203
post Jan 6 2011, 03:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 6 2011, 03:13 PM)
Either 2:8 or 2:10 for BCLK:Ram

Let's say for 2:8 (or 1:4) default BCLK of 950 is 133Mhz
So 133:133mhzx4 is 133:533mhz effective dram freq for DDR3 is 533x2=1066mhz
U may say 133x8 ~1066mhz for 2:8
For 2:10, effective dram speed is 133x10 = 1333mhz
Hope this helps.  biggrin.gif
*
this info is damn clear ! i read through alot and cant understand but what u tell is very ez to understand

made it to 3.8 ~ any comment
user posted image

This post has been edited by gn9746203: Jan 6 2011, 04:24 PM

56 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0283sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 10:07 AM