Qt is not develop for consumer to convert its design for developer so their apps/games can be ported easily. Imagine u design this app and it can use on any OS benefit for developer

but still require a lot of rescripting...solely depends on developer to see if your OS got the potential or not lo...or else they won't waste their time

The benefit having a choice. Thats their choice not yours and ours. Like u keep disparage nokia its your choice.

Like nanotechnolgy there no sign of existance at least QT make it possible to port apps to multiple platform

Nanotechnology no sign of exist.. LOL... Anyway let's see what QT can do... Act not wat QT can do is. How the market respond to convince developer to develop application....

Ok

Who knows right? You're doing assumption also right?

If the app/games put in Intel App Store, can be accessed by multiple smartphone OS. Why not make available to as many as possible and get more people to buy?
It's still better than selling only for one OS.
Plus, who knows what's the plan by Nokia on the Qt? Perhaps, the programmer don't have to do anything, it will be done by the Qt team, or perhaps, there's only very little work or no work at all. Who knows? Are you the Qt developer?

Plus, check out the "Open Screen Project Fund":


I see this as a good thing, no harm having this. Is anybody feel threaten by having such technologies or features available? Why is some people not happy and going negative against something nice to have? If one don't want it, then just leave it, let others enjoy.

---

Added on August 30, 2010, 2:39 pmQt is already available bro, it's NOT something new. Please research more first and it's not just use for mobile applications.

Btw, Qt already running v4.6 and above....


This post has been edited by Andy214: Aug 30 2010, 02:39 PM

Ignore him. This what happen when someone is trying to hard and he is slowly getting outdated. The fella is bb user btw
We will wait for him to post the first nanotechnology on mobile devices existance soon.

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Aug 30 2010, 03:05 PM

Very good that it already exist and running... Problem is not yet see any impact to the market at all.... So I said let see how good it do... Already v4.6.... How many developer adopting it?

Beside, someone are real outdated and claiming other are outdate.... U know lot of sport equipment using nano-tech? I think you know.... And BMW n Merc using nano silver coating to treat VOC in car.... N plenty more... Sorry off topic... Lame...

For me, if Qt successful, then GOOD. If not successful, also no harm to me. So, I don't see what's the problem?
If successful, it'll be GOOD, the more the better, it's beneficial. Imagine, more OS supporting the library, Symbian, MeeGo, Maemo, and possibly more like RIM OS, Web OS, etc.
As I said, it's like Java. The more famous it gets, the better and probably more will adopt it. Plus, from what I've seen, the apps/games developed with it is far better than those Java one.

Whatever it is, it's something good for everyone. If it fails, it doesn't harm us, the consumers. Besides, even if it fails, it will still survive in Symbian, MeeGo and all the OS are were initially planned. It's just whether future OS will adopt it.


This post has been edited by Andy214: Aug 30 2010, 03:50 PM

You have chosen to ignore outdated fellow. View this post · Un-ignore outdated fellow

Lucky feature still working. Cannot read how outdated he is. Ppl compare mobile phone the outdated fellow talking about car and stuff.

Stay on topic

QT is all about multi platform support, sooner or later if nokia keep pushing for the QT then we will see same apps running on all platform like Android/Symbian/IOS

tbh if everyone could just buy N8, it would become the next iPhone. nobody buy iPhone = no apps. btw how did people start buying iphones in the 1st place?

Why not? BRAND. It's Apple.

If you say Nokia? Er... What? TBH, there're many anti-Nokians in Malaysia... I mean, really REALLY.

For some, we judge the phone based on it's spec, price, features, etc.

TBH, most important is the phone suit your needs and fullfill your requirements. If camera is important for you, no matter how powerful or expensive the phone is, if the camera is not good, it's not good.
So, make the RIGHT choice and choose what you want.
Don't buy something because someone say it's good; but something which YOU think it's good FOR YOU.

yea true. Its more beneficial for developer that way.

Who are you? Qt is like JAVA? Hahahaha... see the problem, you got JAVA, why do you need Qt? No one need Qt, except for Nokia. Who is having problem luring developer? Nokia is. Who is trying to standardised the mobile programming? Nokia is. Who is adopting Qt? Nokia is.

SEE THE PROBLEM? Nokia is trying to bcome that Taiko of mobile programming. You think people would just welcome you with open arms? Besides, they are more than just apps nowadays. Its a fully integration of apps + mobile ads. Nokia want a piece of that? Sleep earlier and start dreaming... hahahahaha

You know what?

Just tell Nokia to make all their smartphone, Qt enabled and have all their apps ported into Qt, as a gesture that they will fully support Qt in a big way. How long has it been since they bought over Qt and start all this crap? Dont just talk talk talk...

Nokia wanna change name into NATO or not??? Talk cock only... sendiri punya problem pun tak boleh settle, mao court orang lain lompat pigi Qt... mimpi lar...

Just ignore those two la..
They are so knowledgable.. we are just computer noobs.. all we do is troll here.

Maybe the first question Im gonna ask Nokia during the ranger programme is how many Qt apps were available out there and how many of it is working on the N8... The answer gonna be fantastic...

@BuFung,Andrekua dream will comes true in the future. isn't it?a fantastic technology always start from a dream.

im just copy pasta from this source.

I see the problem. You have something with Nokia, that is. SIMPLE.

As I said, as a consumer, it's beneficial for us. SO what if it fails, which part of you feel the pain or hurt? LoL
If it's successful, it's beneficial to everyone.

And why having Java cannot have Qt? Why do you choose only one? LOL!
I don't mind having both, and Qt apps work better than Java the way I see it SO FAR.

Well, whatever, I'm just sharing that Qt is a technology that will benefit people. If you don't like or have grudge against it, why do you bother or here to make noises? I don't get it, it sounded like you have really big grudge against Nokia, but then it doesn't matter, I'm not here to argue with you which is good which is bad, defend who or what. What you don't like or what problem you have, it's yours to take care of, good luck man.

stop flaming.discussion on N8 thread should be happened by peacefully.

This post has been edited by nicholasbeh: Aug 30 2010, 06:13 PM