Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

119 Pages « < 96 97 98 99 100 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Group LYN Buddhism Retreat - SERIOUS TALK, No trolling please

views
     
nash_ph_41
post Oct 2 2018, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 2 2018, 02:15 PM)
this is a very good question  brows.gif  brows.gif ....the answer is here ...
let me ask u, why after gautama attained enlightenment he go for begging food n do not cook ?? tongue.gif
*
Performing alm is not focusing on food.
will4848
post Oct 2 2018, 03:23 PM

UNKNOWN
*******
Senior Member
6,596 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: DONT KNOW


QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 2 2018, 03:05 PM)
Performing alm is not focusing on food.
*
he dont eat, his disciple also must eat ma .... some more got 1250 doh.gif
so i ask again, why beg n not cook ?
will4848
post Oct 2 2018, 03:31 PM

UNKNOWN
*******
Senior Member
6,596 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: DONT KNOW


QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 2 2018, 02:33 PM)
Check inbox,I reply u on this.
*
actually just reply here la .... buddhism is not something top secret, everybody can learn ma ... tongue.gif
nash_ph_41
post Oct 2 2018, 03:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 2 2018, 03:23 PM)
he dont eat, his disciple also must eat ma .... some more got 1250  doh.gif
so i ask again, why beg n not cook ?
*
Perform alms used to train ownself to let go the ignorance.
Another it benefit to alms giver to accumulate merit and have good deed.
nash_ph_41
post Oct 2 2018, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 2 2018, 03:31 PM)
actually just reply here la .... buddhism is not something top secret, everybody can learn ma ...  tongue.gif
*
Understood, but my experiences is based on own experience and follow the true path. As I'm still on the path, I'm just hope ppl follow the guide from sutra rather experience from other ppl which not attain at least Arahat level.

This is misguide elements exist too. You may choose to open up my answer if u feel relevant.
will4848
post Oct 2 2018, 04:19 PM

UNKNOWN
*******
Senior Member
6,596 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: DONT KNOW


QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 2 2018, 03:54 PM)
Perform alms used to train ownself to let go the  ignorance.
Another it benefit to alms giver to accumulate merit and have good deed.
*
yup, begging can benefit the people that time cos make offering to buddha n arhat can have immeasurable merit ....
not like now, we make offering to buddha statue only, not real buddha sad.gif sad.gif
actually what i want to say here is ...... cooking is also killing ....
why we must cook our food ? cos we dont want germ, bacteria n worm ma, even u cook meat or vege...
and why our rice n vege no insect ?? ... all die already bcos of insecticides...
that mean, even we go vegetarian we still are not "clean" .....
but on the "mindfulness" side, we can produce compassion heart n transfer merit to them ...
deswai when we eat food, others than treat it as food, u also treat them as "medicine" .....
i post this b4 when i reply to your Shurangama question on post 1979...
will4848
post Oct 2 2018, 04:25 PM

UNKNOWN
*******
Senior Member
6,596 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: DONT KNOW


QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 2 2018, 03:58 PM)
Understood, but my experiences is based on own experience and follow the true path. As I'm still on the path, I'm just hope ppl follow the guide from sutra rather experience from other ppl which not attain at least Arahat level.

This is  misguide elements exist too. You may choose to open up my answer if u feel relevant.
*
i dont think we have any arhat now, even have, they will be in some jungle or cave, doing meditation..... this is just my pov...
actually we live in a duality world/dimension, sometime wrong, sometime right, wrong path or right path, biasalah ....
we just need to be mindfulness and know what u r doing .....
panzer97
post Oct 2 2018, 04:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Tun Mahathir taught us kepimpinan melaui teladan , maybe thats why pig is not halal for a certain reason

http://wisdomquarterly.blogspot.com/2009/0...uddha-died.html
Cunda the Blacksmith offered the Buddha a meal. As an alms gatherer, the Buddha accepted his offer for lunch the following day. Together with the Sangha, the Buddha attended. But seeing the food -- sukara maddava ("pig's delight") -- being offered, he asked Cunda to only serve it to him and bury the rest.

What is a meal of "Pig's Delight"?

I have chosen this ambiguous expression to translate the controversial term sukara-maddava (sukara = "pig," maddava = "mild, gentle, soft," also "withered"). It could therefore mean either "the tender parts of a pig" or "what pigs enjoy" (cf. note 46 in The Last Days of the Buddha, Wheel Publication 67-69, BPS 1964, see note 363 [below]).

What is quite clear is that the old commentators did not know for certain what it did mean. DA [Digha Nikaya (Lengthy Discourses) Commentary (Sumangalavilasini by Buddhaghosa, see p. 50)] gives three possibilities:

The flesh of a wild pig, neither too young nor too old, which had come to hand without being killed,
soft boiled rice cooked with "the five products of the cow," or
a kind of elixir of life (rasayana) (cf. next note).

QUOTE(arenax @ Sep 21 2018, 05:03 PM)
LOL.

That's how you guys are brainwashed on the wrong things.

Let me give you an example, if somebody killed you and family in this life.

And he gets to Nirvana as you wrongly claim, would you be happy?

To be able to escape from cycle of birth and rebirth, one has to pay back all debts.

A person can only go to Nirvana if he is 100% virtuous and paid off all past life karmas including not eating and killing animals.

Read the story on how Buddha (which is the highest soul) got his karma when he tried to prevent his kingdom from being destroyed by Kosala kingdom. Many people in his kingdom was killed due to past karma and he also had his headache karma.

How so a lowly person like you who eats meat but who wants to go to Nirvana?

Arhat, prayetbuddha, bodhisatva, Buddha all these are different levels of higher spiritual beings.

Theravada are man-made and not spoken by Buddha. They were modified by certain monks in India so that the monks can continue to eat meat. Which sutra said Buddha allowed meat eating?

All Mahayana monks never eat meat and stick to Buddha's true teachings.
*
panzer97
post Oct 2 2018, 05:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


we're all here to share our own point of view and have fun together in this forum http://factsanddetails.com/world/cat55/sub355/item1336.html

Theravada Buddhism was one of 18 schools that existed in centuries after The Buddha's death.. It spread from India to Sri Lanka and then to Southeast Asia and remained close to the original Pali canon (See Below). The other 17 schools disappeared when Muslims swept into northern India and destroyed the Buddhist monasteries that existed there. Theravada Buddhism is sometimes referred to in a somewhat dismissing way as Hinayana (“Lesser Vehicle”) Buddhism by Mahayana Buddhists

Attached Image

“The earliest form of Buddhism is called the Theravada (Way of the Elders). It adheres strictly to the Buddha's teaching and to his austere life of meditation and detachment. Theravada Buddhists believed that very few would reach nirvana. Initially, in this system, the Buddha was represented in art only by symbols, but in the first century A.D., under the Kushan rulers, the Buddha began to be depicted in human form. At about this time, a new form of Buddhism emerged called the Mahayana (the Great Way), which held that the Buddha was more than a great spiritual teacher but also a savior god. It was believed that he had appeared in perfect human form to relieve suffering with the message that, by performing good deeds and maintaining sincere faith, everyone could reach nirvana through means less strict and arduous than in Theravada

Attached Image

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine...gy-afghanistan/

Attached Image

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-31813681

Attached Image

https://realhistory.co/2018/07/12/greek-city-in-afghanistan/

don't anyone find it strange that Sri Lanka does not suffer the same fate as afghanistan, formerly part of the kushan empire
whomever did the vow to demolish all traces of buddhism in kushan is doing a hell of a job, but why, why not destroy Sri Lanka or Burma etc instead

QUOTE(arenax @ Sep 23 2018, 11:48 AM)
LOL. Don't quote wiki, wiki is not 100% true, wiki is written by a group of people who are biased to that subject. Those who don't agree with some of the ideas can't edit it so it's biased. There are many edit wars by different authors in wiki before.

I read tons of Buddhist books over the decades.

I read sutras that are directly translated from sutras and not the diluted version that third or fourth party writes.

When I was young, I used to read those English books written by westerners which are not correct and diluted. They teach people the wrong things just to promote Christianity.

Then I got hold of the real sutras translated word by word, and it was completely different from those diluted version.
Theravada is NOT the oldest school, it is Mahayana.

Anyway, we agree to disagree. No need to argue until the end of the world and we still don't agree with each other.
*
nash_ph_41
post Oct 2 2018, 05:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 2 2018, 04:25 PM)
i dont think we have any arhat now, even have, they will be in some jungle or cave, doing meditation..... this is just my pov...
actually we live in a duality world/dimension, sometime wrong, sometime right, wrong path or right path, biasalah ....
we just need to be mindfulness and know what u r doing .....
*
You get the point. For those attain arahat level have be verified and announce by Buddha himself.

Since Buddha no longer in physical world there is no one could verify this.

This post has been edited by nash_ph_41: Oct 2 2018, 09:19 PM
will4848
post Oct 2 2018, 08:10 PM

UNKNOWN
*******
Senior Member
6,596 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: DONT KNOW


QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 2 2018, 05:23 PM)
You get the point. For those attain arahat level have been verified and announcements by Buddha himself.

Since buddha no longer in physical world there is no one could verify this.
*
got buddha ma, got many self claim living buddha .... but i can tell u, all is fake one. bruce.gif bruce.gif bruce.gif
nash_ph_41
post Oct 2 2018, 09:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 2 2018, 08:10 PM)
got buddha ma, got many self claim living buddha .... but i can tell u, all is fake one.  bruce.gif  bruce.gif  bruce.gif
*
Ha ha. End Dharma period, you will keep see this thing get common.
panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 01:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


thanks for sharing on the 'meat' topic and found from the sutta

Majjhima Nikāya 55 Jivaka Sutta
https://what-buddha-said.net/Canon/Sutta/MN/MN55.htm

This have I heard: On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Rajagaha in the Mango Grove of Jivaka Komārabhacca. Then Jivaka Komārabhacca went to the Blessed One, and after paying respect to him, he sat down at one side and said to the Blessed One:

Venerable sir I have heard this: They slaughter living beings for the recluse Gotama, the recluse Gotama deliberately eats meat prepared for him from animals killed for his sake... Venerable sir, do those who postulate this actually speak about what has been said & done by the Blessed One and do they not misrepresent him with what is contrary to the facts? Do they really describe what is in accordance with the truth, so that nothing can provide reason for any criticism. Is any of their accusations really correct ? [369]

Jivaka, those who speak thus, do not truthfully speak about what has been said or done by me, but misrepresent me with what is untrue and quite contrary to the actual facts...
Jivaka, I say there are three occasions in which meat should not be eaten; when it is seen, heard or suspected that the living being has been killed for sake of a bhikkhu. I say: Meat should not be eaten on these three occasions.
I say that there are three occasions in which meat may be eaten: when it is not seen, not heard, and not suspected, that the living being has been killed for sake of the bhikkhu, I say: Meat may be eaten on these three occasions.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


If anyone slaughters a living being for sake of the Tathagata or any of his disciples, he thereby creates much demerit in these five instances: When he says: Go and fetch that living sentient being this is the first instance in which he lays up much demerit. When that living being experiences pain and fear on being led along by the neck, this is the second instance in which he lays up much demerit.
When he says: Go and slaughter that living sentient being this is the third instance in which he accumulates much demerit. When that living being experiences pain and panic on being killed, this is the fourth instance in which he lays up much demerit. When he provides the Tathagata or his disciples with such food that is not permitted, which is unsuitable & unacceptable, this is the fifth instance in which he collects much demerit.
Anyone who slaughters a living being for sake of the Tathagata or any of his disciples creates future disadvantage on these five occasions...

When this was spoken, Jivaka Komârabhacca said to the Blessed One:
It is wonderful, Venerable Sir, it is marvellous. The bhikkhus sustain themselves with allowed, acceptable & blameless food... Magnificent, Venerable Sir, Magnificent, Venerable Sir!...
From today let the Blessed One remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him for shelter for as long
as this life lasts.

Jivaka later became the Buddha's & the Bhikkhu Sangha's lifelong doctor.

QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Sep 29 2018, 07:56 PM)
Stated in a lot sutra. One of sutra named Shurangama
Source
*
nash_ph_41
post Oct 3 2018, 03:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
Thanks for sharing. Reader maybe would confuse on contradictions of both sutra.

Actually is OK if we view from the timeline when this sutra is speak. Is just like you allow and kind to a primary student to play and experience around, while have tight rule for a postgraduate student on their study and behavior.

Therefore there is no wrong on this,just different perception either a person wish to stay preliminary state or adsend to another state of mind.

Allow.me to shared one more info.Among there is hundred of sutra or mantra, there must be a beginning where this sutra being start destroy or vanish from humankind.

But why start with this sutra first rather than other? I leave this inquiry for you all to perform some research.

In last phases of Total Annihilation of the Dharma Sutra:
QUOTE
“Then the Śūraṅgama Sūtra and the Pratyutpanna Buddha Sammukhāvasthita Samādhi Sūtra will be destroyed, to be followed by all other sūtras in the twelve categories. Their words will not be seen again. The monk’s robe will naturally turn white. When my Dharma perishes  it will be like [the flame of] an oil lamp. When it is dying, its light becomes brighter for a while then dies out. When my Dharma perishes, it will be like the extinction of a lamp.


SOS

QUOTE(panzer97 @ Oct 3 2018, 01:44 PM)
thanks for sharing on the 'meat' topic and found from the sutta

Majjhima Nikāya 55 Jivaka Sutta
https://what-buddha-said.net/Canon/Sutta/MN/MN55.htm

This have I heard: On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Rajagaha in the Mango Grove of Jivaka Komārabhacca. Then Jivaka Komārabhacca went to the Blessed One, and after paying respect to him, he sat down at one side and said to the Blessed One:

Venerable sir I have heard this: They slaughter living beings for the recluse Gotama, the recluse Gotama deliberately eats meat prepared for him from animals killed for his sake... Venerable sir, do those who postulate this actually speak about what has been said & done by the Blessed One and do they not misrepresent him with what is contrary to the facts? Do they really describe what is in accordance with the truth, so that nothing can provide reason for any criticism. Is any of their accusations really correct ? [369]

Jivaka, those who speak thus, do not truthfully speak about what has been said or done by me, but misrepresent me with what is untrue and quite contrary to the actual facts...
Jivaka, I say there are three occasions in which meat should not be eaten; when it is seen, heard or suspected that the living being has been killed for sake of a bhikkhu. I say: Meat should not be eaten on these three occasions.
I say that there are three occasions in which meat may be eaten: when it is not seen, not heard, and not suspected, that the living being has been killed for sake of the bhikkhu, I say: Meat may be eaten on these three occasions.
panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 03:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


I presume you are sharing from the mahayana point of view?
I'm looking it from the theravada point of view and view it against sutta / discourse
Irregardless whichever view, we both agree the dharma will disappear (The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha, p. 1805, n. 1747)

400 BCE-4600 CE: Five 1,000 Year Periods (5,000 year cycle)
400 BCE-600 CE: “Analytic-knowledge” arhants.
600-1600 CE: “Dry insight” arhants. End of the age of arhantship.
1600-2600 CE: Non-returners.
2600-3600 CE: Once-returners.
3600-4600 CE: Stream entrants.

QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 3 2018, 03:18 PM)
Thanks for sharing. Reader maybe would confuse on contradictions of both sutra.

Actually is OK if we view from the timeline when this sutra is speak. Is just like you allow and kind to a primary student to play and experience around, while have tight rule for a postgraduate student on their study and behavior.

Therefore there is no wrong on this,just different perception either a person wish to stay preliminary state or adsend to another state of mind.

Allow.me to shared one more info.Among there is hundred of sutra or mantra, there must be a beginning where this sutra being start destroy or vanish from humankind.

But why start with this sutra first rather than other? I leave this inquiry for you all to perform some research.

In last phases of Total Annihilation of the Dharma Sutra:
SOS
*
I would like to enquire about the practice part of yours, theravada can refer visuddhimagga
but how about you?
https://dhammawiki.com/index.php/Visuddhimagga

panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 04:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


I presume you also come from the mahayana point of view, thanks for sharing and am open to all view for learning and dissecting thumbsup.gif

I am not a monk nor a penny cent bean debt counter, so I dont think all sentient debt has to be repaid (hey! whatever floats our boat, no argument here, just discussion) since we have live countless of aeon lives and different understandings

Everyday drive car, accidentally tyre rolled over ants, previous lives sit bullock-cart, no idea how many ants died. Wah, imagine the clinging attachment 'ants debt' to be repaid rclxub.gif

1) Moggalana passed away into the Nibbana-element which is without any remnant of clinging. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors...r/wheel263.html
There, in the Master's presence, at the holiest place of the world, at the source of the deepest peace, Moggallana breathed his last. The inner peace in which he dwelt since he attained to sainthood, never left him. It did not leave him even in the last seven days of his life, which had been so turbulent. But even the threat of doom was only external. This is the way of those who are finally "healed" and holy and are in control of the mind. Whatever Kamma of the past had been able to produce a result in his present life, nevertheless, it could affect only his body, but no longer "him", because "he" no longer identified himself with anything existing only impermanently

2) SN 15.3 Assu Sutta. Tears https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?t=28682

At Savatthi. There the Blessed One said: “From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on. What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—or the water in the four great oceans?”

“As we understand the Dhamma taught to us by the Blessed One, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—not the water in the four great oceans.”

“Excellent, monks. Excellent. It is excellent that you thus understand the Dhamma taught by me.

“This is the greater: the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—not the water in the four great oceans.

“Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a mother. The tears you have shed over the death of a mother while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

“Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father… the death of a brother… the death of a sister… the death of a son… the death of a daughter… loss with regard to relatives… loss with regard to wealth… loss with regard to disease. The tears you have shed over loss with regard to disease while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

“Why is that? From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on. Long have you thus experienced stress, experienced pain, experienced loss, swelling the cemeteries—enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released.”

3) Pansadhovaka-sutta, AN 3.100

If he wants, he recollects his manifold past lives (lit: previous homes), i.e., one birth, two births, three births, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, one hundred, one thousand, one hundred thousand, many aeons of cosmic contraction, many aeons of cosmic expansion, many aeons of cosmic contraction and expansion, [recollecting], 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus he remembers his manifold past lives in their modes and details.

4) (VISUDDHIMAGGA) BY BHADANTACARIYA BUDDHAGHOSA - OTHER DIRECT-KNOWLEDGES - RECOLLECTION OF PAST LIFE I hmm.gif

14. Past life is the continuity lived here and there, taking the immediately previous existence as the beginning [and working backwards]. He recollects: he recalls it, following it out by the succession of aggregates, or by death and rebirth-linking.

15. There are six kinds of people who recollect this past life. They are: other sectarians, ordinary disciples, great disciples, chief disciples, Paccekabuddhas, and Buddhas.

16. Herein, other sectarians recollect only as far back as forty aeons, but not beyond that. Why? Because their understanding is weak for lack of delimitation of mind and matter (see Ch. XVIII). Ordinary disciples recollect as far back as a hundred aeons and as far back as a thousand aeons because their understanding is strong. The eighty great disciples recollect as far back as a hundred thousand aeons. The two chief disciples recollect as far back as an incalculable age and a hundred thousand aeons. Paccekabuddhas recollect as far back as two incalculable ages and a hundred thousand aeons. For such is the extent to which they can convey [their minds back respectively]. But there is no limit in the case of Buddhas.

QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 1 2018, 01:11 AM)
remember, when u attained arhatship, all your good or bad seed(karma) is gone but those sentient being that u harm or help them b4, then how ??
as u also said, once u become arhat u no need to repaid any debt, u no need pay doesn't mean that u dont owe them ma ??
to complete this, u need to come back again to soha world as a bodhisattva(pay debt) to complete your buddhahood ...
deswai arhat is out of samsara but they are not buddha cos arhat still haven't attain anuttara samyak sambodhi (perfect enlightenment).... tongue.gif
*
5) DN27 Aggañña Sutta: On Knowledge of Beginnings http://www.palicanon.org/en/sutta-pitaka/t...-the-cloak.html

Because, Vasettha, anyone from the four castes who becomes a monk, an Arahant who has destroyed the corruptions, who has lived the life, done what had to be done, laid down the burden,819 reached the highest goal, destroyed the fetter of becoming, and become emancipated through super-knowledge — he is proclaimed supreme by virtue of Dhamma and not of non-Dhamma.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This is a parallel fable to the previous Sutta, giving a slightly different account of ‘origins’, and including a devastating attack on the pretensions of the Brahmins. It has close links with Sutta 3, and RD refers to it in some detail in the introduction to that Sutta. He calls it a kind of Buddhist book of Genesis, which is fair enough if one pays attention to the differences. Here there is no creator god, and though we start (at verse 10) with something like the same state ‘in the beginning’, this is of course no absolute beginning but one of the eternally recurring ‘fresh starts’ in saṁsāra.



nash_ph_41
post Oct 3 2018, 05:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
I'm adopting way of Bodhisattva .sos
This is my daily practice everyday.
Uphold 5 percept
Adapt vegetarian lifestyle (without 5 pungent)
Recrite and chant sutra,mantra and Buddha name.
Shurangama mantra is my uphold most.

On Buddhism practice, prolonged with the sutra we read and understand, the most essential is experience by ourself the path that Buddha show us. Some practice meditation,some use sutra and mantra.just try to search way of cultivation that suit to us.

All this practice should be help daily,just like having meal everyday.By the time accumulated and practice you would feel they joy and blissful upon this.

Many bless.

QUOTE(panzer97 @ Oct 3 2018, 03:36 PM)
I presume you are sharing from the mahayana point of view?
I'm looking it from the theravada point of view and view it against sutta / discourse
Irregardless whichever view, we both agree the dharma will disappear (The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha, p. 1805, n. 1747)

400 BCE-4600 CE: Five 1,000 Year Periods (5,000 year cycle)
400 BCE-600 CE: “Analytic-knowledge” arhants.
600-1600 CE: “Dry insight” arhants. End of the age of arhantship.
1600-2600 CE: Non-returners. 
2600-3600 CE: Once-returners.
3600-4600 CE: Stream entrants.
I would like to enquire about the practice part of yours, theravada can refer visuddhimagga
but how about you?
https://dhammawiki.com/index.php/Visuddhimagga
*
Chrono-Trigger
post Oct 3 2018, 07:21 PM

BY SELF ONE IS DEFILED AND PURIFIED
*******
Senior Member
4,307 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 3 2018, 05:03 PM)
I'm adopting way of Bodhisattva .sos
This is my daily practice everyday.
Uphold 5 percept
Adapt vegetarian lifestyle (without 5 pungent)
Recrite and chant sutra,mantra and Buddha name.
Shurangama mantra is my uphold most.

On Buddhism practice, prolonged with the sutra we read and understand, the most essential is  experience by ourself the path that Buddha show us. Some practice meditation,some use sutra and mantra.just try to search way of cultivation that suit to us.

All this practice should be help daily,just like having meal everyday.By the time accumulated and practice you would feel they joy and blissful upon this.

Many bless.
*
You can read about the Boddisatta ideal in Theravada buddhism. It is not an exclusively Mahayana teaching.

This post has been edited by Chrono-Trigger: Oct 3 2018, 07:36 PM
Chrono-Trigger
post Oct 3 2018, 07:34 PM

BY SELF ONE IS DEFILED AND PURIFIED
*******
Senior Member
4,307 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
QUOTE(will4848 @ Sep 28 2018, 12:28 AM)
if arhat = buddha, then what about Pratyekabuddha ? also same same ?
if all are the same then why different name ?
actually all the name represent their state of mind(consciousness)....
even though all 3 is out of samsara but the level of pranja they attained is different ....
buddha attained is anuttara samyak sambodhi, is the highest perfection of wisdom ....
just like a salt drop into a bucket of water n dissolve in the water, no salt, just salty water = oneness ...
so buddha is everywhere n he knows everything, so there is "nothing to be obtained" since he is also everything(in samadhi state)....
*
Arahant can be used to refer to any person who has reached the state of Nibbana. In this regard, Sammasambuddho (supreme Buddha), Pacekka Buddha (solitary buddha) and Arahants (disciples of Supreme Buddha) are all Arahants.

Arahant can also be used, most of the time to refer to the disciples of the Supreme Buddha.

Mahayana has a different view though.
nash_ph_41
post Oct 3 2018, 07:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(Chrono-Trigger @ Oct 3 2018, 07:21 PM)
You can read about the Boddisatta ideal in Theravada buddhism. It is not an exclusively Mahayana teaching.
*
Is ok either Theravada or Mahayana, both is from Buddha.

119 Pages « < 96 97 98 99 100 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0243sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 11:39 AM