Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Group LYN Buddhism Retreat - SERIOUS TALK, No trolling please

views
     
panzer97
post Aug 9 2018, 11:38 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


is the below in the sutta, which discourse / nikaya to find it?

THE BUDDHA FORETELLS THE GRADUAL DECLINE OF RELIGION
('Anagatavamsa')
Praise to that Lord, Arahant, perfect Buddha.
Thus have I heard: At one time the Lord was staying near Kapilvatthu in the Banyan monastery on the bank of the river Rohani

Then the venerable Sariputta questioned the Lord about the future

Conqueror:


'The Hero that shall follow you,

The Buddha-of what sort will he be?

I want to hear of him in full.

Let the Visioned One describe him.'



When he had heard the Elder's speech

The Lord spoke thus:

'I will tell you, Sariputta,

Listen to my speech.



In this auspicious aeon

Three leaders have there been:

Kakusandha, Konagamana

And the leader Kassapa too.


'I am now the perfect Buddha,

And there will be Metteyya [i.e., Maitreya] too

Before this same auspicious aeon

Runs to the end of its years.




'The perfect Buddha, Metteyya

By name, supreme of men.'

(Then follows a history of the previous existence of Metteyya . . . and then the description of the gradual decline of the religion:)

'How will it occur? After my decease there will first be five disappearances. What five? The disappearance of attainment (in the Dispensation), the disappearance of proper conduct, the disappearance of learning, the disappearance of the outward form, the disappearance of the relics. There will be these five disappearances.

'Here attainment means that for a thousand years only after the lord's complete Nirvana will monks be able to practice analytical insights. As time goes on and on these disciples of mine are nonreturners and once-returners and stream-winners. There will be no disappearance of attainment for these. But with the extinction of the last stream-winner's life, attainment will have disappeared.

'This, Sariputta, is the disappearance of attainment.

'The disappearance of proper conduct means that, being unable to Practice jhana, insight, the Ways and the fruits, they will guard no lore the four entire purities of moral habit. As time goes on and on they will only guard the four offences entailing defeat. While there are even a hundred or a thousand monks who guard and bear in mind the four offences entailing defeat, there will be no disappearance of proper conduct. With the breaking of moral habit by the last monk- or on the extinction of his life, proper conduct will have disappeared.

'This, Sariputta, is the disappearance of proper conduct.

'The disappearance -of learning means that as long as there stand firm the texts with the commentaries pertaining to the word of the Buddha in the three Pitakas, for so long there will be no disappearance of learning. As time goes on and on there will be base-born kings, not Dhamma-men; (dharma) their ministers and so on will not be Dhamma-men, and consequently the inhabitants of the kingdom and so on will not be Dhamma-men. Because they are not Dhamma-men it will not rain properly. Therefore the crops will not flourish well, and in consequence the donors of requisites to the community of monks will not be able to give them the requisites. Not receiving the requisites the monks will not receive pupils. As time goes on and on learning will decay. In this decay the Great Patthana itself will decay first. In this decay also (there will be) Yamaka, Kathavatthu, Puggalapannati, Dhatukatha, Vibhanga and Dhammasangani. When the Abhidhamma Pitaka decays the Suttanta Pitaka will decay. When the Suttantas decay the Anguttara will decay first. When it decays the Samyutta Nikaya, the Majjhima Nikaya, the Digha Nikaya and the Khuddaka-Nikaya will decay. They will simply remember the jataka together with the Vinaya Pitaka. But only the conscientious (monks) will remember the Vinaya Pitaka. As time goes on and on, being unable to remember even the jataka, the Vessantara-jataka will decay first. When that decays the Apannaka-jataka will decay. When the jatakas decay they will remember only the Vinaya-Pitaka. As time goes on and on the Vinaya-Pitaka will decay. While a four-line stanza still continues to exist among men, there will not be a disappearance of learning. When a king who has faith has had a purse containing a thousand (coins) placed in a golden' casket on an elephant's back, and has had the drum (of proclamation) sounded in the city up to the second or third time, to the effect that: "Whoever knows a stanza uttered by the Buddhas, let him take these thousand coins together with the royal elephant"-but yet finding no one knowing a four-line stanza, the purse containing the thousand (coins) must be taken back into the palace again-then will be the disappearance of learning.

'This, Sariputta, is the disappearance of learning.

'As time goes on and on each of the last monks, carrying his robe, bowl, and tooth-pick like Jain recluses, having taken a bottle-gourd and turned it into a bowl for almsfood, will wander about with it in his forearms or hands or hanging from a piece of string. As time goes on and on, thinking: 'What's the good of this yellow robe?" and cutting off a small piece of one and sticking it on his nose or ear or ill his hair, he will wander about supporting wife and children by agriculture, trade and the like. Then he will give a gift to the Southern community for those (of bad moral habit). I say that he will then acquire an incalculable fruit of the gift. As time goes on and on, thinking: "What's the good of this to us?", having thrown away the piece Of yellow robe, he will harry beasts and birds in the forest. At this time the outward form will have disappeared.

'This, Sariputta, is called the disappearance of the outward form.

'Then when the Dispensation of the Perfect Buddha is 5,000 years old, the relics, not receiving reverence and honour, will go to places where they can receive them. As time goes on and on there will not be reverence and honour for them in every place. At the time when the Dispensation is falling into (oblivion), all the relics, coming from every place: from the abode of serpents and the deva-world and the Brahma-world, having gathered together in the space round the great Bo-tree, having made a Buddha-image, and having performed a "miracle" like the Twin-miracle, will teach Dhamma. No human being will be found at that place. All the devas of the ten-thousand world system, gathered together, will hear Dhamma and many thousands of them will attain to Dhamma. And these will cry aloud, saying: "Behold, devatas, a week from today our One of the Ten Powers will attain complete Nirvana." They will weep, saying: "Henceforth there will be darkness for us." Then the relics, producing the condition of heat, will burn up that image leaving no remainder.

'This, Sariputta, is called the disappearance of the relics.'
panzer97
post Aug 9 2018, 12:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


ok but it would be helpful to be able to read direct from a source and to know the verses no., search from google hmm.gif
The Connected Discourses of the Buddha - Selections | Wisdom ...
https://www.wisdompubs.org/book/connected.....-part-v-nalanda
Then the Venerable Sāriputta approached the Blessed One, paid homage to him, ... sir, whatever Arahants, Perfectly Enlightened Ones will arise in the future, ...

QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Aug 9 2018, 12:00 PM)
佛說法滅盡經
Buddha Pronounces the Sūtra of the Total Annihilation of the Dharma

Content in this sutra is near with your queries.
Have some common similarity.
*
panzer97
post Aug 11 2018, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


found it from google, fascinating! The good Dhamma of penetration (pativedhasaddhammo) will last five thousand years. The Dhamma of learning (pariyattidhammo) will also last this long. For without learning, there is no penetration, and as long as there is learning, there is penetration” (quoted from the Manorathpurani in Bodhi, trans., The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha, p. 1805, n. 1747). Each millennium represents a progressive diminution in dharma attainment, passing through five stages of analytic knowledge, dry-insight arhantship, non-returning, once-returning, and stream entering

400 BCE-4600 CE: Five 1,000 Year Periods (5,000 year cycle)
400 BCE-600 CE: “Analytic-knowledge” arhants.
600-1600 CE: “Dry insight” arhants. End of the age of arhantship.
1600-2600 CE: Non-returners. hmm.gif interesting!
2600-3600 CE: Once-returners.
3600-4600 CE: Stream entrants.

any of u all heard before 'Anagatavamsa Desana'?

panzer97
post Oct 2 2018, 04:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Tun Mahathir taught us kepimpinan melaui teladan , maybe thats why pig is not halal for a certain reason

http://wisdomquarterly.blogspot.com/2009/0...uddha-died.html
Cunda the Blacksmith offered the Buddha a meal. As an alms gatherer, the Buddha accepted his offer for lunch the following day. Together with the Sangha, the Buddha attended. But seeing the food -- sukara maddava ("pig's delight") -- being offered, he asked Cunda to only serve it to him and bury the rest.

What is a meal of "Pig's Delight"?

I have chosen this ambiguous expression to translate the controversial term sukara-maddava (sukara = "pig," maddava = "mild, gentle, soft," also "withered"). It could therefore mean either "the tender parts of a pig" or "what pigs enjoy" (cf. note 46 in The Last Days of the Buddha, Wheel Publication 67-69, BPS 1964, see note 363 [below]).

What is quite clear is that the old commentators did not know for certain what it did mean. DA [Digha Nikaya (Lengthy Discourses) Commentary (Sumangalavilasini by Buddhaghosa, see p. 50)] gives three possibilities:

The flesh of a wild pig, neither too young nor too old, which had come to hand without being killed,
soft boiled rice cooked with "the five products of the cow," or
a kind of elixir of life (rasayana) (cf. next note).

QUOTE(arenax @ Sep 21 2018, 05:03 PM)
LOL.

That's how you guys are brainwashed on the wrong things.

Let me give you an example, if somebody killed you and family in this life.

And he gets to Nirvana as you wrongly claim, would you be happy?

To be able to escape from cycle of birth and rebirth, one has to pay back all debts.

A person can only go to Nirvana if he is 100% virtuous and paid off all past life karmas including not eating and killing animals.

Read the story on how Buddha (which is the highest soul) got his karma when he tried to prevent his kingdom from being destroyed by Kosala kingdom. Many people in his kingdom was killed due to past karma and he also had his headache karma.

How so a lowly person like you who eats meat but who wants to go to Nirvana?

Arhat, prayetbuddha, bodhisatva, Buddha all these are different levels of higher spiritual beings.

Theravada are man-made and not spoken by Buddha. They were modified by certain monks in India so that the monks can continue to eat meat. Which sutra said Buddha allowed meat eating?

All Mahayana monks never eat meat and stick to Buddha's true teachings.
*
panzer97
post Oct 2 2018, 05:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


we're all here to share our own point of view and have fun together in this forum http://factsanddetails.com/world/cat55/sub355/item1336.html

Theravada Buddhism was one of 18 schools that existed in centuries after The Buddha's death.. It spread from India to Sri Lanka and then to Southeast Asia and remained close to the original Pali canon (See Below). The other 17 schools disappeared when Muslims swept into northern India and destroyed the Buddhist monasteries that existed there. Theravada Buddhism is sometimes referred to in a somewhat dismissing way as Hinayana (“Lesser Vehicle”) Buddhism by Mahayana Buddhists

Attached Image

“The earliest form of Buddhism is called the Theravada (Way of the Elders). It adheres strictly to the Buddha's teaching and to his austere life of meditation and detachment. Theravada Buddhists believed that very few would reach nirvana. Initially, in this system, the Buddha was represented in art only by symbols, but in the first century A.D., under the Kushan rulers, the Buddha began to be depicted in human form. At about this time, a new form of Buddhism emerged called the Mahayana (the Great Way), which held that the Buddha was more than a great spiritual teacher but also a savior god. It was believed that he had appeared in perfect human form to relieve suffering with the message that, by performing good deeds and maintaining sincere faith, everyone could reach nirvana through means less strict and arduous than in Theravada

Attached Image

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine...gy-afghanistan/

Attached Image

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-31813681

Attached Image

https://realhistory.co/2018/07/12/greek-city-in-afghanistan/

don't anyone find it strange that Sri Lanka does not suffer the same fate as afghanistan, formerly part of the kushan empire
whomever did the vow to demolish all traces of buddhism in kushan is doing a hell of a job, but why, why not destroy Sri Lanka or Burma etc instead

QUOTE(arenax @ Sep 23 2018, 11:48 AM)
LOL. Don't quote wiki, wiki is not 100% true, wiki is written by a group of people who are biased to that subject. Those who don't agree with some of the ideas can't edit it so it's biased. There are many edit wars by different authors in wiki before.

I read tons of Buddhist books over the decades.

I read sutras that are directly translated from sutras and not the diluted version that third or fourth party writes.

When I was young, I used to read those English books written by westerners which are not correct and diluted. They teach people the wrong things just to promote Christianity.

Then I got hold of the real sutras translated word by word, and it was completely different from those diluted version.
Theravada is NOT the oldest school, it is Mahayana.

Anyway, we agree to disagree. No need to argue until the end of the world and we still don't agree with each other.
*
panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 01:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


thanks for sharing on the 'meat' topic and found from the sutta

Majjhima Nikāya 55 Jivaka Sutta
https://what-buddha-said.net/Canon/Sutta/MN/MN55.htm

This have I heard: On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Rajagaha in the Mango Grove of Jivaka Komārabhacca. Then Jivaka Komārabhacca went to the Blessed One, and after paying respect to him, he sat down at one side and said to the Blessed One:

Venerable sir I have heard this: They slaughter living beings for the recluse Gotama, the recluse Gotama deliberately eats meat prepared for him from animals killed for his sake... Venerable sir, do those who postulate this actually speak about what has been said & done by the Blessed One and do they not misrepresent him with what is contrary to the facts? Do they really describe what is in accordance with the truth, so that nothing can provide reason for any criticism. Is any of their accusations really correct ? [369]

Jivaka, those who speak thus, do not truthfully speak about what has been said or done by me, but misrepresent me with what is untrue and quite contrary to the actual facts...
Jivaka, I say there are three occasions in which meat should not be eaten; when it is seen, heard or suspected that the living being has been killed for sake of a bhikkhu. I say: Meat should not be eaten on these three occasions.
I say that there are three occasions in which meat may be eaten: when it is not seen, not heard, and not suspected, that the living being has been killed for sake of the bhikkhu, I say: Meat may be eaten on these three occasions.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


If anyone slaughters a living being for sake of the Tathagata or any of his disciples, he thereby creates much demerit in these five instances: When he says: Go and fetch that living sentient being this is the first instance in which he lays up much demerit. When that living being experiences pain and fear on being led along by the neck, this is the second instance in which he lays up much demerit.
When he says: Go and slaughter that living sentient being this is the third instance in which he accumulates much demerit. When that living being experiences pain and panic on being killed, this is the fourth instance in which he lays up much demerit. When he provides the Tathagata or his disciples with such food that is not permitted, which is unsuitable & unacceptable, this is the fifth instance in which he collects much demerit.
Anyone who slaughters a living being for sake of the Tathagata or any of his disciples creates future disadvantage on these five occasions...

When this was spoken, Jivaka Komârabhacca said to the Blessed One:
It is wonderful, Venerable Sir, it is marvellous. The bhikkhus sustain themselves with allowed, acceptable & blameless food... Magnificent, Venerable Sir, Magnificent, Venerable Sir!...
From today let the Blessed One remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him for shelter for as long
as this life lasts.

Jivaka later became the Buddha's & the Bhikkhu Sangha's lifelong doctor.

QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Sep 29 2018, 07:56 PM)
Stated in a lot sutra. One of sutra named Shurangama
Source
*
panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 03:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


I presume you are sharing from the mahayana point of view?
I'm looking it from the theravada point of view and view it against sutta / discourse
Irregardless whichever view, we both agree the dharma will disappear (The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha, p. 1805, n. 1747)

400 BCE-4600 CE: Five 1,000 Year Periods (5,000 year cycle)
400 BCE-600 CE: “Analytic-knowledge” arhants.
600-1600 CE: “Dry insight” arhants. End of the age of arhantship.
1600-2600 CE: Non-returners.
2600-3600 CE: Once-returners.
3600-4600 CE: Stream entrants.

QUOTE(nash_ph_41 @ Oct 3 2018, 03:18 PM)
Thanks for sharing. Reader maybe would confuse on contradictions of both sutra.

Actually is OK if we view from the timeline when this sutra is speak. Is just like you allow and kind to a primary student to play and experience around, while have tight rule for a postgraduate student on their study and behavior.

Therefore there is no wrong on this,just different perception either a person wish to stay preliminary state or adsend to another state of mind.

Allow.me to shared one more info.Among there is hundred of sutra or mantra, there must be a beginning where this sutra being start destroy or vanish from humankind.

But why start with this sutra first rather than other? I leave this inquiry for you all to perform some research.

In last phases of Total Annihilation of the Dharma Sutra:
SOS
*
I would like to enquire about the practice part of yours, theravada can refer visuddhimagga
but how about you?
https://dhammawiki.com/index.php/Visuddhimagga

panzer97
post Oct 3 2018, 04:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


I presume you also come from the mahayana point of view, thanks for sharing and am open to all view for learning and dissecting thumbsup.gif

I am not a monk nor a penny cent bean debt counter, so I dont think all sentient debt has to be repaid (hey! whatever floats our boat, no argument here, just discussion) since we have live countless of aeon lives and different understandings

Everyday drive car, accidentally tyre rolled over ants, previous lives sit bullock-cart, no idea how many ants died. Wah, imagine the clinging attachment 'ants debt' to be repaid rclxub.gif

1) Moggalana passed away into the Nibbana-element which is without any remnant of clinging. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors...r/wheel263.html
There, in the Master's presence, at the holiest place of the world, at the source of the deepest peace, Moggallana breathed his last. The inner peace in which he dwelt since he attained to sainthood, never left him. It did not leave him even in the last seven days of his life, which had been so turbulent. But even the threat of doom was only external. This is the way of those who are finally "healed" and holy and are in control of the mind. Whatever Kamma of the past had been able to produce a result in his present life, nevertheless, it could affect only his body, but no longer "him", because "he" no longer identified himself with anything existing only impermanently

2) SN 15.3 Assu Sutta. Tears https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?t=28682

At Savatthi. There the Blessed One said: “From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on. What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—or the water in the four great oceans?”

“As we understand the Dhamma taught to us by the Blessed One, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—not the water in the four great oceans.”

“Excellent, monks. Excellent. It is excellent that you thus understand the Dhamma taught by me.

“This is the greater: the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—not the water in the four great oceans.

“Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a mother. The tears you have shed over the death of a mother while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

“Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father… the death of a brother… the death of a sister… the death of a son… the death of a daughter… loss with regard to relatives… loss with regard to wealth… loss with regard to disease. The tears you have shed over loss with regard to disease while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time—crying & weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing—are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

“Why is that? From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on. Long have you thus experienced stress, experienced pain, experienced loss, swelling the cemeteries—enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released.”

3) Pansadhovaka-sutta, AN 3.100

If he wants, he recollects his manifold past lives (lit: previous homes), i.e., one birth, two births, three births, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, one hundred, one thousand, one hundred thousand, many aeons of cosmic contraction, many aeons of cosmic expansion, many aeons of cosmic contraction and expansion, [recollecting], 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus he remembers his manifold past lives in their modes and details.

4) (VISUDDHIMAGGA) BY BHADANTACARIYA BUDDHAGHOSA - OTHER DIRECT-KNOWLEDGES - RECOLLECTION OF PAST LIFE I hmm.gif

14. Past life is the continuity lived here and there, taking the immediately previous existence as the beginning [and working backwards]. He recollects: he recalls it, following it out by the succession of aggregates, or by death and rebirth-linking.

15. There are six kinds of people who recollect this past life. They are: other sectarians, ordinary disciples, great disciples, chief disciples, Paccekabuddhas, and Buddhas.

16. Herein, other sectarians recollect only as far back as forty aeons, but not beyond that. Why? Because their understanding is weak for lack of delimitation of mind and matter (see Ch. XVIII). Ordinary disciples recollect as far back as a hundred aeons and as far back as a thousand aeons because their understanding is strong. The eighty great disciples recollect as far back as a hundred thousand aeons. The two chief disciples recollect as far back as an incalculable age and a hundred thousand aeons. Paccekabuddhas recollect as far back as two incalculable ages and a hundred thousand aeons. For such is the extent to which they can convey [their minds back respectively]. But there is no limit in the case of Buddhas.

QUOTE(will4848 @ Oct 1 2018, 01:11 AM)
remember, when u attained arhatship, all your good or bad seed(karma) is gone but those sentient being that u harm or help them b4, then how ??
as u also said, once u become arhat u no need to repaid any debt, u no need pay doesn't mean that u dont owe them ma ??
to complete this, u need to come back again to soha world as a bodhisattva(pay debt) to complete your buddhahood ...
deswai arhat is out of samsara but they are not buddha cos arhat still haven't attain anuttara samyak sambodhi (perfect enlightenment).... tongue.gif
*
5) DN27 Aggañña Sutta: On Knowledge of Beginnings http://www.palicanon.org/en/sutta-pitaka/t...-the-cloak.html

Because, Vasettha, anyone from the four castes who becomes a monk, an Arahant who has destroyed the corruptions, who has lived the life, done what had to be done, laid down the burden,819 reached the highest goal, destroyed the fetter of becoming, and become emancipated through super-knowledge — he is proclaimed supreme by virtue of Dhamma and not of non-Dhamma.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This is a parallel fable to the previous Sutta, giving a slightly different account of ‘origins’, and including a devastating attack on the pretensions of the Brahmins. It has close links with Sutta 3, and RD refers to it in some detail in the introduction to that Sutta. He calls it a kind of Buddhist book of Genesis, which is fair enough if one pays attention to the differences. Here there is no creator god, and though we start (at verse 10) with something like the same state ‘in the beginning’, this is of course no absolute beginning but one of the eternally recurring ‘fresh starts’ in saṁsāra.




 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0709sec    0.31    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:55 PM