Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
VW Golf 1.4TSI,Scirocco1.4,Polo 1.2TSI, Volkswagen Cars Discussion.Das Auto!
|
TSphas3r
|
Aug 9 2010, 02:51 AM, updated 15y ago
|
|
VW Golf 1.4TSI,Scirocco1.4,Polo 1.2TSI available in Malaysia Volkswagen Polo 1.2TSI: (2010 World Car of the Year)  Engine : 1.2L 4 cylinder turbo Power : 105PS@5000rpm Torque : 175Nm@1550rpm Top Speed : 190km/h 0-100kph : 9.7sec Fuel Consumption : 5.3L/100km Price : RM109,000 http://paultan.org/2010/08/09/volkswagen-p...i-dsg-malaysia/Volkswagen Golf 1.4TSI (2009 World Car of the Year with 2009 & 2010 Engine of the Year)  Engine : 1.4L 4 cylinder, Twincharged (Turbocharged and supercharged) Power : 160PS@5800rpm Torque : 240Nm@1500rpm Top Speed : 220km/h 0-100km/h : 8 secs Price : RM148,888 & RM155,888 Fuel Consumption : 6.0L/100km http://paultan.org/2010/08/09/volkswagen-g...60-ps-rm155888/Volkswagen Scirocco 1.4TSI (with 2009 & 2010 Engine of the Year)  Engine : 1.4L 4 cylinder, Twincharged (Turbocharged and supercharged) Power : 160PS@5800rpm Torque : 240Nm@1500rpm Top Speed : 218km/h 0-100km/h : 8 secs Fuel Consumption : 6.3L/100km Price : RM188,888 http://paultan.org/2010/08/09/volkswagen-s...60-ps-rm188888/all three equipped with new 7 speed DSG gearbox Golf 1.4TSI Test drive by paultanhttp://paultan.org/2010/09/15/volkswagen-g...t-drive-review/ Polo 1.2TSI Test drive by paultanhttp://paultan.org/2010/10/18/volkswagen-p...st-impressions/ This post has been edited by phas3r: Dec 17 2010, 09:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jolipoli81
|
Aug 9 2010, 03:20 AM
|
|
scirocco still looks better though too bad it is a 2 car door
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kampung2005
|
Aug 9 2010, 03:24 AM
|
Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
|
Polo is affordable
|
|
|
|
|
|
xshiro
|
Aug 9 2010, 03:26 AM
|
Getting Started

|
why scricco is rated at 218kmh top speed while golf with the same engine gets 220kmh
This post has been edited by xshiro: Aug 9 2010, 03:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSphas3r
|
Aug 9 2010, 03:39 AM
|
|
QUOTE(xshiro @ Aug 9 2010, 03:26 AM) why scricco is rated at 218kmh top speed while golf with the same engine gets 220kmh i wonder that too. both cars have the same weight of 1360kg. but i guess not important la, 2 kph only. shouldn't the roc be more aerodynamic anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ericmaxman
|
Aug 9 2010, 03:59 AM
|
|
no polo gti?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSphas3r
|
Aug 9 2010, 04:05 AM
|
|
yeah, i'm still waiting for polo gti, golf r and scirocco r. i'm sure it will be on sale here, it's just a matter of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ericmaxman
|
Aug 9 2010, 04:06 AM
|
|
i've got an odd feeling that the polo 1.2 won't sell well here...........
|
|
|
|
|
|
cranx
|
Aug 9 2010, 04:26 AM
|
|
I love scirocco's design.
a very rare car in malaysia
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSphas3r
|
Aug 9 2010, 04:32 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Aug 9 2010, 04:06 AM) i've got an odd feeling that the polo 1.2 won't sell well here........... it's currently the most powerful car in its class.. am i right ? 175Nm too This post has been edited by phas3r: Aug 9 2010, 04:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
xshiro
|
Aug 9 2010, 05:22 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(phas3r @ Aug 9 2010, 03:39 AM) i wonder that too. both cars have the same weight of 1360kg. but i guess not important la, 2 kph only. shouldn't the roc be more aerodynamic anyway?  im thinking again, maybe different gear ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
stormlcc
|
Aug 9 2010, 06:30 AM
|
|
QUOTE(xshiro @ Aug 9 2010, 05:22 AM) im thinking again, maybe different gear ratio only 2kmph difference, why would the engineers change the gear ratios just for this? it's not cost effective. should be the aerodynamics, one is for high speed cruising (and also fuel efficiency due to more slippery body) the other more on handling This post has been edited by stormlcc: Aug 9 2010, 06:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
ericmaxman
|
Aug 9 2010, 06:42 AM
|
|
QUOTE(cranx @ Aug 9 2010, 04:26 AM) I love scirocco's design. a very rare car in malaysia yeah. spotted a few before  QUOTE(phas3r @ Aug 9 2010, 04:32 AM) it's currently the most powerful car in its class.. am i right ? 175Nm too but my guess is, 1.2L car for very close to RM110k..... maybe its just me
|
|
|
|
|
|
squareballs
|
Aug 9 2010, 07:30 AM
|
|
I wonder how's the FC of the Polo.. Price is interesting..
|
|
|
|
|
|
ghoster
|
Aug 9 2010, 07:53 AM
|
|
i didnt expect VW polo pricing anywhere near rm100k. interesting, i might buy polo when i got married
|
|
|
|
|
|
busbos
|
Aug 9 2010, 07:56 AM
|
|
oh mai..the polo is damn affordable
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSahshuy
|
Aug 9 2010, 09:24 AM
|
Getting Started

|
polo is cheap, srsly dirt cheap... 100k is a good reason to switch from any other sub 100k japanese cars to this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stereokumonomu
|
Aug 9 2010, 09:35 AM
|
|
Nice! seems like polo is very nicely well priced.
well of course if it priced a few thousands below 100k, it will be selling like hot cakes!!
CBU or CKD?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenji1903
|
Aug 9 2010, 09:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(squareballs @ Aug 9 2010, 07:30 AM) I wonder how's the FC of the Polo.. Price is interesting.. from the fact sheet it say 5.3l/100km (18+km/l) mix urban/suburb... very good actually  beats my 08 City VTEC at 15km/l
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zack Styler
|
Aug 9 2010, 09:44 AM
|
|
If only got diesel version..
|
|
|
|
|