Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Your StarCraft 2 Rig, and the graphics/game performance

views
     
kianweic
post Aug 4 2010, 04:41 PM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


My PC specifications:

Intel i7 920 - cooled by Cool IT self contained watercooler
Nvidia Geforce GTX285 - cooled by Artic Cooling tri-fan
6GB RAM
Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit

Played Starcraft 2 with the following settings:

Resolution: 1920x1200
Details: All ultra (where applicable)

Others: 4xAA (to try 8xAA when free)

In game fps: above 60fps at all times.

However, I had to enable V-sync as the tearing was really apparent during cinematic.
EternalCore
post Aug 4 2010, 05:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
22 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia



Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 3.2Ghz @ 3.72Ghz

Mobo: Asus Crosshair IV

Ram: Kingston HyperX 1600 4GB

HD 1: WD 1TB Performance Series (Black Edition)

HD 2: WD 500GB Blue Series

HD 3: WD 320GB Green Series

Cooler: Cooler Master V10

PSU: Corsair HX750W Modular

GPU: ATI SAPPHIRE 5830 1GB

Case: Cooler Master HAF 932

DAMN SMOOTH - FULL SETTING
petrofsky77
post Aug 4 2010, 05:12 PM

Temet nosce
******
Senior Member
1,691 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Neither here nor there



C2D 2.66GHz
8GB RAM
HD4850X2
Acer H233H 23" LCD
Win 7 Ultimate x64
1920 X 1080 res
Ultra Setting
Max Quality on Ati Catalyst

Verdict : Smooth on all gameplay and cinematics, but could be improved once Ati released an AA update for this game tho. Edges still looks jagged to me even with 8X AA enabled on Catalyst.

This post has been edited by petrofsky77: Aug 4 2010, 05:13 PM
mai-k
post Aug 4 2010, 05:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
362 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Core i5 750
4GB Kingston DDR3
896MB Nvidia GTX 260
Windows 7 64 bit

1280 x 1024 ultra settings
55-65 fps during battle
viruz019
post Aug 4 2010, 05:51 PM

iSeeStars
******
Senior Member
1,518 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Here'n'There


Core i5 750
4GB Corsair DDR3
ATI HD5850
Window 7 64Bit

1650X1050 running on Ultra settings

din reli check the fps..but no lag at all tongue.gif

hate running the game using my other acer lcd..the color reli terrible~


wilsonphua
post Aug 4 2010, 06:19 PM

Gear Up. Game On.
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
CB......I'm using laptop....and my Acer laptop only cost rm2.5k....compared to all of you who use desktop, mine sucks shit

NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
Windows Vista SP2
Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10GHz
4GB RAM


Can play SC2 at 1024x768

All graphic settings low, except for texture quality (MEDIUM), Terrain (ULTRA), Models (HIGH), Unit Portraits (3D), Movies (HIGH)

70-100 fps when building my base in Skirmish mode.

40-60 fps when I build my units and send them to the enemy's base.

30-60 fps when shooting, tactical nuke

70-210 fps when playing cinematics

20-40 fps when playing some single player campaign, example, "THE DEVILS' PLAYGROUND"

50 fps at most gameplay

I don't know why sometimes my fps goes up to 153 although I've capped my fps to 60, using the Variables.txt in my documents

After playing for one hour, the temperature is around 70 degree Celsius.

onimusha_m16
post Aug 5 2010, 08:29 AM

Mr Bean
******
Senior Member
1,239 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Malacca


C2D E6600 @ 3 ghz
3gb ddr2 ram
Sapphire 5670 512mb
1440*900 monitor

some mission can run on mostly ultra.. but lagged on some mission like the larva map..

therefore i play on high for overall smoothness
Breaktru
post Aug 5 2010, 12:13 PM

== The World ==
******
Senior Member
1,769 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia


Here it goes ,

Intel C2D E4500 @ 2.75Ghz
3GB DDR2 Corsair XMS
Nvidia 8800GT 512
Win 7 x64

Mostly high setting at 1920x1080 . FPS around 40-60 , big battle might reduce it to 25-30 .

This post has been edited by Breaktru: Aug 5 2010, 12:14 PM
finger_waverz
post Aug 5 2010, 01:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
i always think that my pc is a bit slow when doing my job ( architectural rendering ).....

but i was amazed when i played SC2 ultra setting with no lag at all

phenom 2 x4 955
4gb rams
ati 4850
roronoa_zorro
post Aug 5 2010, 02:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
i use a cheap pc
E6600 + Ati 4350
play at LOW setting haha
i built my pc for W3 can play W3 at high setting

planning to play at ultra setting later on...
cuz currently i play using my ps3 more than i play using my pc
Jarod
post Aug 5 2010, 04:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: localhost


how do you check the fps?

EDIT: nevermind. found it. ctrl+alt+F.

is there anyway to increase the font size of the fps reading? the font is so small i can even read it.

This post has been edited by Jarod: Aug 5 2010, 07:16 PM
TongCN
post Aug 6 2010, 06:10 AM

Look ma, I have lots stars :D
*******
Senior Member
6,610 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Malaysia



Rig: On my sig smile.gif

Setting:
(i) High ~ Ultra when playing 1v1 or 2v2 @ 1080p
(ii) Med ~ High when 3v3 or 4v4 @ 1080p
(iii) Ultra when playing campaign @ 1080p

So far so good smile.gif

stalkie
post Aug 6 2010, 07:05 AM

Best thing of my life...
******
Senior Member
1,795 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Ampang


I'm running on laptop Asus G73, all set to the highest possible and run smoothly. Although Blizzard said my graphic card is not supported....... biggrin.gif
goldfries
post Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




Athlon II X3 425 + 4GB RAM + GT220 (supposed to be GTX470 la but having some rig problem. hehe.)

surprisingly GT220 can play at 1680x1050 (i let the game decide the setting) and it still looks really good, unlike games like C&C series, low details make things really ugly.
kianweic
post Aug 6 2010, 07:49 AM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM)
Athlon II X3 425 + 4GB RAM + GT220 (supposed to be GTX470 la but having some rig problem. hehe.)

surprisingly GT220 can play at 1680x1050 (i let the game decide the setting) and it still looks really good, unlike games like C&C series, low details make things really ugly.
*
I thought you have one rig with GTX295?
sieg_wahrheit
post Aug 6 2010, 08:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


Processor: intel 980x @ stock (haven't oc'ed yet tongue.gif)
Ram: 12GB Gskill DDR3 @ 6-9-6-24
Mobo: Asus P6T7 supercomputer
HD: 160GB intel ssd
GC: 1x Ati HD5970
PSU: xigmatek 1500w
Casing: Mountain mods ascension
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Running SC2 on 1920x1080 at all ultra/max settings. Havent checked my fps but there are Some lag when there are too many units on-screen (but not noticeable enough). Everything else went super smooth... thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by sieg_wahrheit: Aug 6 2010, 08:16 AM
aLertz
post Aug 6 2010, 08:17 AM

Overconfidence is a flimsy shield
******
Senior Member
1,111 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: TaiPinG / Singapore



QUOTE(stalkie @ Aug 6 2010, 07:05 AM)
I'm running on laptop Asus G73, all set to the highest possible and run smoothly. Although Blizzard said my graphic card is not supported....... biggrin.gif
*
Asus G73 JH??? waaaa....imbaaaaa shocking.gif

QUOTE(sieg_wahrheit @ Aug 6 2010, 08:09 AM)
Processor: intel 980x @ stock (haven't oc'ed yet tongue.gif)
Ram: 12GB Gskill DDR3 @ 6-9-6-24
Mobo: Asus P6T7 supercomputer
HD: 160GB intel ssd
GC: 1x Ati HD5970
PSU: xigmatek 1500w
Casing: Mountain mods ascension
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Running SC2 on 1920x1080 at all ultra/max settings. Havent checked my fps but there are Some lag when there are too many units on-screen (but not noticeable enough). Everything else went super smooth... thumbup.gif
*
another imba rig shocking.gif
goldfries
post Aug 6 2010, 08:56 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(kianweic @ Aug 6 2010, 07:49 AM)
I thought you have one rig with GTX295?
*
had. rigs change. biggrin.gif btw I like GTX 470 better.
sieg_wahrheit
post Aug 6 2010, 09:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(aLertz @ Aug 6 2010, 08:17 AM)
another imba rig  shocking.gif
*
just a humble one... blush.gif

havent installed my wc setup though...
kianweic
post Aug 6 2010, 09:28 AM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 6 2010, 08:56 AM)
had. rigs change. biggrin.gif btw I like GTX 470 better.
*
Based on your review, the temperature seems quite ok. Noise wise?

11 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.23    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 09:27 PM