Digital Camera every month got collect photos one ma. can go try your luck.

how to submit??..can give me the website?

go magazine store buy the magazine lor... its called Digital Camera..

ya filter murah ones

the magazine i posted yesterday was Digital SLR photography, not to be confused with Digital Camera magazine

Digital SLR photography more expensive one wor.. tak sampai hati to part with that sum of money

---

Added on August 4, 2010, 12:22 pmSig, the 18-200 is out~!!...

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 4 2010, 12:22 PM

where? where?

lwliam: 800 Euros weh the 18200mm SEL... both magazine i tak suka baca la... kinda boring.... too UK-ish.. coz they dont change much...

hazril: cannot view his photos la. dont know why.. sigh.. haha. i tengok kat dyxum jer.

@ http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/

coming soon to malaysian shores

was bored to death waiting my gf to finish work yesterday, so walk to nearest bookstore and accidentally bought the magazine

i think better follow masta lufiahs la, buying natgeo magazine. as he said, "if wanna sleep, read the articles, if don't wanna sleep, look at the photos." lol.

but i noticed discovery magazine kinda looks more attractive. maybe because it is more colorful compared to the boring yellow-colored natgeo cover. but natgeo photogs are better right?

hahha, accidentally...

havent really looked at discovery mag.. but nat geo's really good.. the articles are ok what... i sometimes stop at MPH/Popular and flip through a couple of articles before walking away free reading

There are two types of Minolta 35-105 lenses. One with a macro feature and the other is without. I own the one that has the macro feature at 105mm (really love the bokeh at this focal length). This lens is my favorite lens for portraits (especially when I shoot weddings). It's not that wide at 35mm to be considered as my walk around lens.

Here are some sample taken from this lens with A300 just now (have been a while since I shoot with this camera).

ps : sorry the model was not that attractive...
pss : all EXIF datas are intact.

tot31: nice nice.... looks like HDR plak. haha.. thanks.. i think ill get this lens and test it out.. need to reshuffle my lenses.. so nex have to wait. lol.

NEX really hurt the micro 4 3rd industry.. i wonder how are panasonic and olympus going to cope...

---

Added on August 4, 2010, 3:18 pmoff topic:




This post has been edited by zstan: Aug 4 2010, 03:18 PM

OT reply: zstan, aiks... i tot i want to be low profile some more.. anyone joining?

really urs ar willly? nice stuff

Mikeshashimi: I had the Minolta 35-105mm F3.5-4.5 RS - not such a good lens. Quite weak in resolution. The 35-105mm F3.5-4.5 Original I hear is much better.

signither: Missing 24 megapixels already ah? Though nothing beats 71 gigapixels in terms of Let's Enhance-ability.

National Geographic pictures are more of the real thing and have more substance compared to camera magazines. Haven't flipped through a Discovery though.

going to korea this november...there goes my funds for a new lens or other accessories..

wow, never come here for awhile..been busy..

OMG ! my photo got selected for Digital SLR ! so happy man, at least it encourages me

and special thanks to signither for pointing this out

If i am not mistaken, maybe I ll get a 4gb sandisk SD card ...well, better than ntg

P/S : fruitie , it's d4rkholeang3l lolz...

lol give ler 8gb ke..