QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Jul 27 2010, 03:59 PM)
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V43!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V43!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:01 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
cassplayer: Eh the link you gave is for the Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 I was talking about! As far as I know the brightest M42 lens at 85mm was a F1.5, and the existing Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 does not come in ZS (M42 mount).
http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/Cont...125710E005F5A21 Note that this is a different optical design from the Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 ZA for A-mount. |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:06 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 27 2010, 03:56 PM) nope. it depends on the aperture blades. not entirely true. if thats the case, every single lens manufacturer will put 9999 blades into their lens design d...generally, the more blades the smoother the bokeh. correct me if i am wrong. it also takes into consideration of the lens element design and light transmission path. taking into account diffraction and the physical size of the barrel. balancing weight, diffraction, coma, CA, f-stop and a whole lot others that i cant remember now. |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Jul 27 2010, 03:59 PM) that's what i'm trying to get the answer..since i look on the pic earlier.. only shows the aperture comparison but not others.. like determine the sharper pic etc.. i believe it not use the same shutter speed.. |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,557 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Republic of Selayang |
interested to get a prime to fill in the range between my 16/2.8 pancake and my 50/1.4.
35/1.4G is totally out of my budget. 20/2.8 kinda nice, i love the range, most of the time i put a rubber wrist-band locking my KM1735 at 20mm. a bit expensive though and very hard to find used one. new one would also be out of my budget. how's the performance of 28/2.8 ya? it's not wide enough on APS-C i think. but it's cheap. but is it worth it? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:10 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
siggie, if u plan to use on NEX, might as well get m42 lenses? going to be manual anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Your head, your heart Status: Outside Settle! |
QUOTE(albnok @ Jul 27 2010, 04:01 PM) cassplayer: Eh the link you gave is for the Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 I was talking about! As far as I know the brightest M42 lens at 85mm was a F1.5, and the existing Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 does not come in ZS (M42 mount). Yeah I did a search on that lens. Not too bad actually http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/Cont...125710E005F5A21 Note that this is a different optical design from the Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 ZA for A-mount. Now, to search for 135mm f3.5 also. There was also a 50mm f0.95 at the shop in Osaka |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
cassplayer : got 28mm or not..
lol all want kirim.. |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:14 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
f/0.95? how much?
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Your head, your heart Status: Outside Settle! |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:35 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
MechaHerc, i think what he meant was, the physical aperture itself in determining the bokeh, not in technical terms..
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,557 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Republic of Selayang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:50 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
kekeke.. i not that noob untill donno between the shutter/aperture..
just that when mentioned about bokeh.. could be the softer 'bulat²' can be produced by playing with shutter value? or distance or what ever related to make it smooth like sundae.. of course the aperture is the priority.. This post has been edited by 8tvt: Jul 27 2010, 05:05 PM |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 05:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
cassplayer: maybe u should make a bulk list.. coz i think alot of people would want it.. haha.
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 05:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
haha. its its that cheap... no worries. HAHA.. can use on my
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 05:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,375 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Your head, your heart Status: Outside Settle! |
Will ask my friend to find as many mint ones as possible. And also if his bag can fit that many
And also, if Japan Yen hasnt rised till crazy at that time. The last time he checked it was around RM150 after conversion. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0281sec
0.67
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:07 AM |