This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 12 2010, 01:24 PM
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V43!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jul 12 2010, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3   
|
i try silhouette
This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 12 2010, 01:24 PM |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 10:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
guys, please continue the UWA poison.. kekeke
  |
|
|
Jul 14 2010, 03:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
using STF wit MLV Check is totally awesome
|
|
|
Jul 14 2010, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 14 2010, 03:51 PM) means that the light entering the light at f2.8 is equivalent to the light entering at a normal lens at f4.5? for easy unnderstanding is like this bro, the dof will produce same like F2.8, but the light transmission is F4.5 <- shutter close a bit slow compare to normal F2.8 lens,, |
|
|
Jul 14 2010, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 14 2010, 04:07 PM) gosh..its getting more and more technical.. haha.. now grab u camera n post the pic here mang.  i guess i will stick back to taking good pictures without worrying too much on the technical aspects. @@  |
|
|
Jul 14 2010, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Jul 14 2010, 04:29 PM) play play photochop like tis ok ka??? somehow i like this editing bro. or oredy too much noise added?? miss my km24-105. the bokeh better than sal16105   This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 14 2010, 04:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jul 15 2010, 10:41 AM) so there's no different between the 2 lenses mentioned above? its out of the league if we talk about the bokeh Added on July 15, 2010, 10:43 amzstan : later pengsan to buy G lens hehe..  |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Jul 15 2010, 11:20 AM) really vote for the flash why i thought ppl will say lens 1st haha, is i buy a 58am i can play wireless right with my AM42? u already have flash n kitlen tele.. which one u always use? if u always use tele, buy the G sell the kitlen tele, if u always play the flash n enjoy the wireless off flash, get the F58 bro |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 12:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Jul 15 2010, 12:09 PM) is want buy which should i go? if u consider the heavy weight get the Sigma, Some how u can still crop the 200mm to get 300mm view at G.. if u not always print u pic la..  |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 01:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 15 2010, 01:23 PM) translation: lol, good job my fren.. hahaha I like shoot macro but sometime I find out 42am no cukup but even I also like to play studio shoot too. But lens can slowly to consider Which should I want is too rush get later regret again ha. |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(hazril @ Jul 15 2010, 02:56 PM) i think i wrote wrongly... i oredi ask this to albert back therewe know that aps-c and FF dof is different...my question is how do we know the aperture on FF to get the similar DOF on aps-c for example f2.8 on aps-c = f??? on ff... just some random question pops while doing my work... F2.8 at apsc = F1.8 at FF must divide by 1.5 same like sensor crop.. |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jul 15 2010, 03:11 PM) then APSC has better bokeh? of cos la FF, remember the shallower Dof at FF camera.. QUOTE(8tvt @ Jul 15 2010, 03:18 PM) i think got something wrong with that so called equal.. let say we put 85mm F1.4 at A900, we need a lens (plus minus) 50mm F/0.95 here for apsc lol.. like Leica Noctilux-M lens.. haha like we can get F1.8 FF result with just F2.8 in APSC.. This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 15 2010, 03:23 PM |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 03:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jul 15 2010, 03:26 PM) isn't that the equation would be yes u rite bro. F2.8 at FF = F1.8 at APSC haha QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 15 2010, 03:32 PM) shootkk's brother ka? same thought lol, but kinda shock at 1st shootkk suddenly staff now |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jul 15 2010, 03:45 PM) haha u really make me pening.. no need pening bro, just multiply or divide the number only, for FF the F will more brighter (small number) than the APCS.. i need to knock² my rusty head and smiling like crazy ppl in front of pc.. This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 15 2010, 03:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 04:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Jul 15 2010, 04:30 PM) MechaHerc: Eh I don't remember saying to divide the aperture by 1.5 LOL. But yes, it's around there. eh, i still remember when i ask achew about tamron 90mm 2.8 at APSC vs 135 F1.8 (set at 2.8) at FF lol. n u explain with detail to me about this.. haha |
|
|
Jul 19 2010, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Jul 19 2010, 04:40 PM) Got the OPTECH Pro Loop strap! Feels great with a700 + VG + 70200 f2.8 (: how much u got it bro? any recomended seller? |
|
|
Jul 23 2010, 06:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(jumajuma @ Jul 23 2010, 06:00 PM) hai guys.. got some problem with my a200.. dust inside the viewfinder and the viewfinder indicator also not working. didnt use the cam for around 6month and only left it inside the car boot lol, u gotta be kiddin man, 6 months at car boot? till recently need to use it for some work. I still can shoot picture.. no dust at the image also.. but i cant figure out the focusing zone because no indicator at viewfinder. btw the bottom info at viewfinder still functioning.any recommended place to service and repair the viewfinder? and how much the expected service and repair cost? should i repair or buy the new one? edit : just sent 1st bro n ask how muc they charge This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jul 23 2010, 06:05 PM |
|
|
Jul 26 2010, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Jul 26 2010, 05:40 PM) 85mm ada la 1.4 tapi ............... soon, but sadly 85mm F2.8.. why sony no make 1 normal or f/1.8 85mm and 35mm  |
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 03:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
can wait wat lens will announce soon beside 24mm CZ
|
|
|
Jul 27 2010, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 27 2010, 03:56 PM) nope. it depends on the aperture blades. not truth also imho.. if the shutter is fast more bokeh compare to long shutter..generally, the more blades the smoother the bokeh. correct me if i am wrong. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0489sec
 0.43
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:35 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.