Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V10, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
|
noobie1
|
 Jul 4 2010, 02:48 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 12:47 AM) haiz... sibeh sien la. don't have 50mm at the moment.. next year only buy a better gear to get 50mm. currently using 70-300mm(small bazooka only) lolx...u like this aso sien...then i mar more sien?? coz i only have kit lens...=.=" QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 12:53 AM) ooooooooooo that sigmalux. 50mm f/1.4..  that one of course expensive.. i saw the price somewhere in the forum... got another sigmalux?? |
|
|
|
|
|
ongdandy
|
Jul 4 2010, 02:52 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jul 4 2010, 02:48 AM) lolx...u like this aso sien...then i mar more sien?? coz i only have kit lens...=.=" got another sigmalux?? you got 18-105mm..ok what..better than my one.. 18-55mm. that small bazooka not easy to take picture = = |
|
|
|
|
|
bad melatonin
|
Jul 4 2010, 03:21 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 02:52 AM) you got 18-105mm..ok what..better than my one.. 18-55mm. that small bazooka not easy to take picture = = i start off with 1855. i learned tonnes of lessons using my 1855  ... |
|
|
|
|
|
ongdandy
|
Jul 4 2010, 03:41 AM
|
|
|
lol.. i learn in few month only.. now i wanna try that 70-300mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
noobie1
|
Jul 4 2010, 04:46 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 02:52 AM) you got 18-105mm..ok what..better than my one.. 18-55mm. that small bazooka not easy to take picture = = but now u got 18-55 and 70-300 wor...better than me lor...  |
|
|
|
|
|
bad melatonin
|
Jul 4 2010, 04:58 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 03:41 AM) lol.. i learn in few month only.. now i wanna try that 70-300mm u genius, ofcos can learn in few moths only. u can be pro in another few more months..  im moderate user, needs years to learn the basic.  This post has been edited by bad melatonin: Jul 4 2010, 04:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ongdandy
|
Jul 4 2010, 05:12 AM
|
|
|
lol.. i study broadcasting.. what to do =/ @ @"
This post has been edited by ongdandy: Jul 4 2010, 05:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
bad melatonin
|
Jul 4 2010, 05:50 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ongdandy @ Jul 4 2010, 05:12 AM) lol.. i study broadcasting.. what to do =/ @ @" waaah... no wonder la u terer.. |
|
|
|
|
|
celciuz
|
Jul 4 2010, 08:37 AM
|
|
|
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 versus the Nikon f/1.4D. Frankly, I used both on the D3 before. I can't exactly see the differences...
Oh right, and the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 was sold already, due to focusing issue with my friend's D3.
This post has been edited by celciuz: Jul 4 2010, 08:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Jul 4 2010, 11:02 AM
|
|
|
Wow, so I think 55-200 is my choice then... RM800 can get it or not ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Jul 4 2010, 11:45 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Jul 4 2010, 11:02 AM) Wow, so I think 55-200 is my choice then... RM800 can get it or not ? If not mistaken you can get lowest new set at 890... 2nd hand maybe 750 and below. Last time i saw one only rm400 wtf i didnt buy... when i decided to buy already sold T__T |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Jul 4 2010, 11:51 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 4 2010, 11:45 AM) If not mistaken you can get lowest new set at 890... 2nd hand maybe 750 and below. Last time i saw one only rm400 wtf i didnt buy... when i decided to buy already sold T__T Really WTF ... I see so RM890 lowest for new 1... Okay, save up for that la.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Faint
|
Jul 4 2010, 12:19 PM
|
|
|
How bout Sigma 50-200 ? What is the lowest u guys can found ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Jul 4 2010, 12:23 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Faint @ Jul 4 2010, 12:19 PM) How bout Sigma 50-200 ? What is the lowest u guys can found ? Seldom heard about the sigma, but shashinki is selling at RM1250. I checked and this sigma has HSM OS, similar to nikon's SWM VR. I think it might be better than nikon's (judging at the price alone) but you need to read more reviews and try personally on that. But I will suggest the cheaper Nikon =D |
|
|
|
|
|
celciuz
|
Jul 4 2010, 12:25 PM
|
|
|
^ Same, I would go with 55-200mm VR anytime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Jul 4 2010, 12:59 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 4 2010, 12:25 PM) ^ Same, I would go with 55-200mm VR anytime. If nikon got 70-200 VR F4.0 i will buy... No budget for F2.8 =X |
|
|
|
|
|
celciuz
|
Jul 4 2010, 01:18 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 4 2010, 12:59 PM) If nikon got 70-200 VR F4.0 i will buy... No budget for F2.8 =X Nikon has plans for f/4 if not mistaken. But I would say, stick to f/2.8! I used f/4 for event yesterday. Haiz shutter not fast enough  . |
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Jul 4 2010, 01:22 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 4 2010, 01:18 PM) Nikon has plans for f/4 if not mistaken. But I would say, stick to f/2.8! I used f/4 for event yesterday. Haiz shutter not fast enough . Of course F2.8 is better lo But poor students like me how to earn freaking 7k! Even if I can earn 7k during holidays, I also feel bad for buying such expensive things at this age, my family is poor also =X But constant F4 is anyway better than F5.6 lo |
|
|
|
|
|
Faint
|
Jul 4 2010, 01:38 PM
|
|
|
But Sigma build quality is freaking, nice to hold and really silent. Later wanna go shop try both of them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
celciuz
|
Jul 4 2010, 01:53 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 4 2010, 01:22 PM) Of course F2.8 is better lo But poor students like me how to earn freaking 7k! Even if I can earn 7k during holidays, I also feel bad for buying such expensive things at this age, my family is poor also =X But constant F4 is anyway better than F5.6 lo Well definitely...  . QUOTE(Faint @ Jul 4 2010, 01:38 PM) But Sigma build quality is freaking, nice to hold and really silent. Later wanna go shop try both of them! Sigma silent? Sure or not... As far as I know the SWMs are the best for Nikons. I can't even hear my 16-35 focusing at all! |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0281sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled