QUOTE(aeiou228 @ Nov 17 2010, 12:37 AM)
The bandaraya guy said an example of PTUAB is even a small town with commercial activities with at least a bank branch, school, rumah ibadat, taman is PTUAB.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
To me, I would liquidate the BH asap if my gut feeling tells me that my BH is in PTUAB. I don't want to wait till the argument of PTUAB become clearer and clearer. By the time everyone knows the official definition of PTUAB, RM1000 per nest become RM30 per nest liao......

The above is my personal view only.
Me thinks we are allowing the PBT to frame the issue here, which we should challenge.
The basis of most of the public complaints are
1)noise
2)smell
3)uninformed fear of some unknown swiftlet borne diseases
How did the authorities did a 'superman' leap to arrive at PTUAB from the above 3 points?
As such we are stuck worrying about how the PTUAB is going to be defined for each PBT geographical jurisdiction!!!
Use of PTUAB is merely a convenient adoption w/o basis.
IMHO all should attend the current roadshows by the authorities and voice your dissent for such artificial construct as PTUAB.
The authorities should stick to the matter ie
1)noise - what level?
2)smell - use of EM or other ammonia reducing methods or better still do research for the industry.
3)disease - educate the public ...here the assoc in conjunction with research facilities should go on a sustained news blitz on this unfounded fear.
Remember towns normally do not die out as such will at some point encroach into your NOW non-PTUAB BH.
As such the use of PTUAB is missing the real issues and unsustainable in the long run.
However if we stick to the basis (ie the above 3 pts) it will remain current for the long haul.
As such IMHO I advocate questioning use of PTUAB as part of the guideline.This is a creeping definition.I think the proper term is '
legislative risk' and a most unnecessary one at that.
With a stroke of the pen your BH now falls foul of the definition through no fault of yours nor within your control.
Now anyone game to invest RM500,000 to have your nuts in a vice.??
Another major issue whcih I have with the 1GP is the need to adhere to the building bylaws!!!
Except for shophouse units which are dual usage, standalone are not purpose built for human habitation.
More people are killed from poorly designed cars that burst into flames upon impact than people killed from collapsing BHs.
How many incidents have you heard of collapsing BHs?
I may have heard of 1 where the guy was DIY all the way.
The most we know (from the forum) are falling incidents which in my view are 'accidents'.
Essentially occupational hazard!!
A particular bank is now advocating those RM30K BHs built from plywood!
Anyone know if these are structurally certified? Do these comply with the building bylaws?
What BH will those recipients of the govt grant go for with the RM10K given out?