Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
|
samurai1337
|
May 21 2010, 02:40 PM
|
@_@
|
I for one, shoot RAW exclusively with my GF1 and post-process it with Adobe Lightroom. Why? 1. RAW output for GF1 is much better than its JPEG output 2. Better control on the mood and setting of the subject 3. Better control on the dynamic range 4. Better noise reduction, I could still shoot ISO1600 and improve it via PP I agree why most people prefer to shoot JPEG, but it's a matter of habit I think... PP is just an extra step of the whole photography process to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSgogo2
|
May 21 2010, 02:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 21 2010, 02:40 PM) I for one, shoot RAW exclusively with my GF1 and post-process it with Adobe Lightroom. Why? 1. RAW output for GF1 is much better than its JPEG output 2. Better control on the mood and setting of the subject 3. Better control on the dynamic range 4. Better noise reduction, I could still shoot ISO1600 and improve it via PP I agree why most people prefer to shoot JPEG, but it's a matter of habit I think... PP is just an extra step of the whole photography process to me  You just imply we're lazy..!!! hehehe... Anyway, GF1 user mostly come from dSLR user and Olympus user mostly come from P&S. Oppss... run away now.... kekeke
|
|
|
|
|
|
hellfire8888
|
May 21 2010, 04:55 PM
|
|
jpeg or raw is a matter of preference...some say why shoot raw when u can make it right the first time using jpeg and some say otherwise...in the end it is up to the photographer to justify his/her own action on why he prefer the certain format..in the end..it is all about ...the photographer way of enjoying photography...
This post has been edited by hellfire8888: May 21 2010, 04:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
bbjslee
|
May 21 2010, 05:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 21 2010, 02:40 PM) I for one, shoot RAW exclusively with my GF1 and post-process it with Adobe Lightroom. Why? 1. RAW output for GF1 is much better than its JPEG output 2. Better control on the mood and setting of the subject 3. Better control on the dynamic range 4. Better noise reduction, I could still shoot ISO1600 and improve it via PP I agree why most people prefer to shoot JPEG, but it's a matter of habit I think... PP is just an extra step of the whole photography process to me  I am lazy, so Oly suits me best!
|
|
|
|
|
|
mersey96
|
May 21 2010, 06:36 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ May 21 2010, 04:55 PM) jpeg or raw is a matter of preference...some say why shoot raw when u can make it right the first time using jpeg and some say otherwise...in the end it is up to the photographer to justify his/her own action on why he prefer the certain format..in the end..it is all about ... the photographer way of enjoying photography... correct.. i don't see anything wrong with my GF1's jpeg output..
|
|
|
|
|
|
samurai1337
|
May 21 2010, 09:02 PM
|
@_@
|
mersey96 - whether you like it or not, JPEG output is a weakness in GF1, although there's always workaround (adjust camera white balance or do PP) http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/page33.aspAs much as it's a matter of preference, I insist that shooting RAW and doing PP is fun and rewarding. I did try to convince myself that it's time wastnig and JPEG is probably good enough, but once I get my hand dirty in Adobe Lightroom there's no turning back  It's really worth every second I spent on it This post has been edited by samurai1337: May 21 2010, 09:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guy85
|
May 21 2010, 09:31 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(gogo2 @ May 21 2010, 11:43 AM) dun have Nissin di622 for m43 camera.. only lower range di466 which is quite good... coz can bounce also... shot to shot also fast... coz 4 battery... and its small enough for m43 camera.... and di466 also have wireless... great stuff if u plan to utilize flash for off the body shooting.. u go and google wireless flash and stuff... its fun!!! metz48 and fl-50r is large... not really compatible with m43..  i dunno about u.. i feel m43 user is not those who want to PP and shooting raw... and for color, i think maybe GF1 can set some colors... to match Olympus... Oh, okok. I thought all Nissin are compatible to M43. Thanks for all the info... Now I know what to choose...
|
|
|
|
|
|
mersey96
|
May 21 2010, 09:52 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 21 2010, 09:02 PM) mersey96 - whether you like it or not, JPEG output is a weakness in GF1, although there's always workaround (adjust camera white balance or do PP) http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/page33.aspAs much as it's a matter of preference, I insist that shooting RAW and doing PP is fun and rewarding. I did try to convince myself that it's time wastnig and JPEG is probably good enough, but once I get my hand dirty in Adobe Lightroom there's no turning back  It's really worth every second I spent on it well... i feel it's good enough to satisfy me.. u don have to refer to that website to show me this.. not wise.. their opinion is not entirely true.. MY OPINION is the most important.. my way.. at the end of the day.. who sets the benchmark when making purchase? there is always some other camera perform below GF1 and above GF1.. i believe good photo is not only judge on sharpness and colour.. it's about the moments and meaning behind it..
|
|
|
|
|
|
samurai1337
|
May 21 2010, 10:16 PM
|
@_@
|
QUOTE(mersey96 @ May 21 2010, 09:52 PM) well... i feel it's good enough to satisfy me.. u don have to refer to that website to show me this.. not wise.. their opinion is not entirely true.. MY OPINION is the most important.. my way.. at the end of the day.. who sets the benchmark when making purchase? there is always some other camera perform below GF1 and above GF1.. i believe good photo is not only judge on sharpness and colour.. it's about the moments and meaning behind it.. I don't see anything wrong with referencing some webpage to support the fact. I totally respect that you're happy with GF1 (I am happy with it too), but I have my freedom to voice out what I think. So please cool down  I am definitely not here to prove that who's right here... This post has been edited by samurai1337: May 21 2010, 10:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mersey96
|
May 21 2010, 10:23 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 21 2010, 10:16 PM) I don't see anything wrong with referencing some webpage to support the fact. I totally respect that you're happy with GF1 (I am happy with it too), but I have my freedom to voice out what I think. So please cool down  I am definitely not here to prove that who's right here... yo man i'm ok.. may sound wrong with my words.. but just voice out what i feel.. don't simpan hati..
|
|
|
|
|
|
samurai1337
|
May 21 2010, 10:31 PM
|
@_@
|
QUOTE(mersey96 @ May 21 2010, 10:23 PM) yo man i'm ok.. may sound wrong with my words.. but just voice out what i feel.. don't simpan hati..  It's okay dude, no big issue here
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIAF
|
May 22 2010, 12:18 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Hey guys, I found this promo from Olympus and I was wondering if that's the market price for an EPL1. I thought it's a little cheaper than that (from the first post). Is this worth it or I can find cheaper prices elsewhere? I don't need any extra lenses for now, just the basic model. Have to save $$$, poor student here lol. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « BTW anyone checked out the new Olympus store in Mid Valley? Any nice promotion stuff?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSgogo2
|
May 22 2010, 12:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(AIAF @ May 22 2010, 12:18 AM) Hey guys, I found this promo from Olympus and I was wondering if that's the market price for an EPL1. I thought it's a little cheaper than that (from the first post). Is this worth it or I can find cheaper prices elsewhere? I don't need any extra lenses for now, just the basic model. Have to save $$$, poor student here lol. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « BTW anyone checked out the new Olympus store in Mid Valley? Any nice promotion stuff?  Should be cheaper bro... i think for single kit lens, around RM2099... By the way, should I sell 14-42mm and get 9-18mm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
frequency
|
May 22 2010, 01:00 AM
|
|
I got mine @ 2500 with kit lens (with 8GB grade 4 memory card + LCD protector + 1 small sling bag + UV filter) @ 12 months installment 0% @ Shong Lee 1U
Hmm...I guess u can get cheaper somewhere else if you don't need the free gifts of the olympus. As for me, I am in urgent and it is the only shop offered me with 0% for Citibank so no choice lor...
Try get 2 lens package as u may sell off the zoom lense (depends luck) as the standalone lense may cost RM1k over.
This post has been edited by frequency: May 22 2010, 01:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSgogo2
|
May 22 2010, 03:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(frequency @ May 22 2010, 01:00 AM) I got mine @ 2500 with kit lens (with 8GB grade 4 memory card + LCD protector + 1 small sling bag + UV filter) @ 12 months installment 0% @ Shong Lee 1U Hmm...I guess u can get cheaper somewhere else if you don't need the free gifts of the olympus. As for me, I am in urgent and it is the only shop offered me with 0% for Citibank so no choice lor... Try get 2 lens package as u may sell off the zoom lense (depends luck) as the standalone lense may cost RM1k over. erm, probably u get a lot of free stuff... without free stuff.. its 2099 to 2299 like tat I heard...
|
|
|
|
|
|
ae8za
|
May 22 2010, 02:49 PM
|
|
Anybody see the silver E-P2 in KL area selling already? My Aki Asahi leatherette already arrived but still waiting for the silver Pen...  Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
|
|
|
samurai1337
|
May 22 2010, 02:55 PM
|
@_@
|
The Noktor lens sample http://43rumors.com/new-noktor-50mm-f0-95-samples/proven to be a junk cctv lens with the images too soft for my liking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hellfire8888
|
May 22 2010, 04:05 PM
|
|
hmm cctv lens..wat a rip off..
|
|
|
|
|
|
frequency
|
May 22 2010, 07:01 PM
|
|
today go to touch and feel with the olympus all carry sling bag. the surrounding is not padded except the divider for for lenses.
Hmmm look not so promising protection for the camera and lenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
tadasu
|
May 22 2010, 07:30 PM
|
|
hi guys,
Im currently a DSLR user (40D), been looking at M43 to replace my 40D especially GF-1 because of their much smaller size and portability. Any ex-DSLR users here who regret switching?
|
|
|
|
|