Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
16 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx

views
     
SUSgogo2
post Apr 23 2010, 02:08 PM, updated 16y ago

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


user posted image

QUOTE(D@Ne @ Jul 22 2010, 05:34 PM)
Hi guys,

I came across this ebook for EP2. Hope you find it useful.

user posted image

Link: Ebook
*
Important link:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Price:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

FAQ
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

User list:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Facebook
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Firmware update
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


What to check if you're buying new:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 22 2010, 09:23 PM
SUSgogo2
post May 12 2010, 07:32 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ May 12 2010, 05:41 PM)
was looking forward to jump ship to sony mirrorless..really dissapointing...
fail big time..hoping canon n nikon can do a better job with their upcoming mirrorless camera..
*
I beg to differ.... if I were to choose, I might choose Sony. The high ISO is really great. And the
pancake wideangle is awesome size:
user posted image

I created a thread in DPReview and it created a lot of noise, lol..
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...thread=35285239

SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 08:24 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ May 12 2010, 08:38 PM)
high iso vs 10 other cons? no way man...
*
I think most important is small size and able to take high ISO picture. Other cons is not important for
photography smile.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 08:39 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ May 13 2010, 08:37 AM)
dont mislead newbie la..high iso is the last thing to look for in photography... aiyo...u can put statement like high iso is important to you but not photography..

how many magazine cover shoot at more than iso 800? zero?
how many usable sharp shots can you produce at iso 3200 in a bad light environment where most area is dark? 5 out of 100 shots taken?

flash is created for a reason and if a camera do not have basic hot shoe to take external flash and have to rely on the non std sony flash which only god know can bounce or not..then is a turn off and no no...

i would beg to differ ..i will wait for canon/nikon FF mirrorless camera !!
*
but but... flash cannot reach my 300mm (eq to 600mm in FF) target... tongue.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 08:53 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(walikard @ May 13 2010, 08:50 AM)
Gogo2, provoking ka? tongue.gif Hahaha

I guess, I would still love my handsome looking Olympus PEN biggrin.gif
*
no no... not provoking. Just want to said what I feel about NEX. It's very interesting... I'm excited
by technological advancement... I love toys... so don't get me wrong.. tongue.gif

I add you to list of E-PL1 user already....

ANyway, I just bought E-520 and I'm having fun playing with E-520 instead of E-P1... sweat.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 09:05 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(walikard @ May 13 2010, 08:59 AM)
biggrin.gif TQ TQ...get one 1 gogo2...so we can have practical user experience here biggrin.gif
*
can't ler... just got E-520 + 14-42mm + 70-300mm... so wallet empty oredi..haha...

anyone get NEX and share it here lor... tongue.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 10:09 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Wuahaha @ May 13 2010, 10:04 AM)
Fuyooh ... bro u upgraded liao. rclxms.gif

Wait .. ur heart in Four Third now or NEX ? No more in Micro Four Third liao ? Haha. laugh.gif
*
my heart is everywhere... i'm very hua xing oh....
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 10:59 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(ae8za @ May 13 2010, 10:28 AM)
Aahhh, finally E-P2 comes out with all silver version. Time for me to upgrade... wink.gif
Anybody interested with this? PM me for details... smile.gif

user posted image
*
wah... really? u wanna upgrade to E-P2? not interested in E-PL1 or NEX? tongue.gif tongue.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 11:12 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 13 2010, 11:09 AM)
Cool down hellfire8888 / gogo2, at the end of the day all of us love photography, don't we smile.gif

I'm getting my Danbo today, can't wait to shoot it with my Pana GF1 + 20mm! If I do shoot it religiously then I may consider the Pana-Leica 45mm macro tongue.gif
*
Nice...

No la. I no on fire with hellfire.. tongue.gif We just have good discussion...

Anyway, let's carry on discussion about M43 system... sorry for the NEX intermission..haha
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 01:41 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(frequency @ May 13 2010, 01:36 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Notice difference? I thnk I need cap ayam filter problem
btw Noise Red = High, IS=1, Mode=P
*
I notice that with filter it is either soft or out of focus.....

To make sure, you can do manual focus... using 10x magnification and try to focus as best as possible...

then you know if put in the filter causing soft or due to out of focus (because got filter).

QUOTE(bobds78 @ May 13 2010, 01:37 PM)
Sony NEX + 16mm pancake seems like a good toy to play play. With larger lens-18-55mm zoom kit it looked awful, so try imagine coupling it with still larger lens..no no...
*
yes, 16mm lens is the lens I think the best pan cake that m43 don't have... 24mm... something I need... 28mm does not cut it anymore...
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 01:51 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ May 13 2010, 01:48 PM)
I don't think so lor... for notebooks (which I'm more familiar) at least... they all consume the same power.

What's true is that higher resolution screens cost more money. Now that the NEX (the bigger high res screen, the bigger sensor) is out, it quite obvious now that the margins on the M43 is pretty high.
*
i think it depends on the spec of the LCD. Nowaday, every laptop PC using LED backlight LCD... so consume very low power....

So Olympus should get backlight LED LCD to their m43...with higher resolution of course...
SUSgogo2
post May 13 2010, 02:40 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Rival to Panasonic G and GH series from NEX:

Attached Image

Full manual control
1080p@60
1080p@24
720p@120fps and 60p
Revised sensor design (better ISO noise control???)

Wow, I mean, if you're fully NEX user, you can have a pro body with super tele / UWA lens..

while having a small body for partying with wideangle lens!!!
user posted image

Then, when video is needed, slapped the same lens to your E-Mount body handycam like below:
user posted image
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1005/10051103sonycamcorder.asp

I think Sony E mount has the most revolutionary mirrorless system I've ever heard... (aside from the stupid Ricoh GXR stupid system).

This post has been edited by gogo2: May 13 2010, 02:40 PM
SUSgogo2
post May 14 2010, 09:15 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(samurai1337 @ May 14 2010, 08:40 AM)
It's all about good power management! I believe future Oly/Pana M43 models will improve on this

I just got this yesterday
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Perfect combination with 20mm pancake!
*
nice... how much is the danbo? I'm always fascinated with figurines... what is it made of?

This post has been edited by gogo2: May 14 2010, 09:15 AM
SUSgogo2
post May 14 2010, 04:37 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sukun @ May 14 2010, 04:03 PM)
GF1 vs E-P2

alright. come to a conclusion. i will get GF1.
between GF1 bundled with 14-45 for 549 quid and E-P2 with 14-42 for 899 quid
the extra 350 quid for small improvement on quality, i aint digging it.
i will just settle with GF1 and with that extra cash i will get some extra acc.
*
based on that price, E-P2 is seriously overpriced. But I would get E-PL1 though tongue.gif because
IBIS to me is very important.

But I see that you're better off with GF1 since you don't want to consider E-PL1...
SUSgogo2
post May 14 2010, 05:25 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sukun @ May 14 2010, 05:00 PM)
so whats the price for nowadays?
omg, i left out e-pl1
rclxub.gif
research again  doh.gif
*
no need to reasearch.

You choose based on this criteria:

a) GF1 --> faster AF speed (contribute to photo taking) with flash
b) E-P2 --> better build quality and looks retro (does not contribute to photo taking) and IBIS without flash
c) E-PL1 --> cheapest and best quality picture with IBIS but bad build with flash

Easy to choose. If wanna cheap one and good result with IBIS, get E-PL1.

More people will choose GF1 especially pro photog due to responsiveness like dSLR.... but no IBIS...potong markah..

E-P2 is...erm.. if u like the look..
SUSgogo2
post May 15 2010, 02:59 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DaiNgau @ May 15 2010, 11:36 AM)
went there too
user posted image
Nissin white meet white ^^ n black meet black

user posted image
*
omg, the white looks nice... can it wireless with E-series Olympus camera ?
SUSgogo2
post May 15 2010, 06:45 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sumtuckieeeee @ May 15 2010, 05:33 PM)
guys, here's the thing, can anyone help me. I can decide whether to get a D90 or Oly EP-2 since the price is almost the same. Anyone can tell me why I should choose EP-2 over D90? apart from the size.
*
The only reason to get EP-2 over D90 is size. Else, just get D90 for better photography tools..

QUOTE(frequency @ May 15 2010, 06:33 PM)
hmmm after numerous of test (without UV filter) my image still appear not sharp enuf....compared to my panny pns

really need sifu..aikss...to verify liao on hand...
*
Can you set sharpness to maximum?
then use shutter to >1/200
ISO 100 or 200

SUSgogo2
post May 16 2010, 08:36 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(frequency @ May 15 2010, 11:28 PM)
RM360 look like good investment  drool.gif
Good for low light AF lock issue as well (No AF Assist- I need this)

hehehe tomolo ll go for a look....but wait..how bout panny 20mm?
*
anyone can confirm AF assist light will come out when using Olympus M43? I read before that
Olympus m43 will never have AF assist (that's why can't use AF assist of Olympus flash...)


Added on May 16, 2010, 8:38 am
QUOTE(seaotter @ May 16 2010, 08:12 AM)
hmm.

should i get the EPL1 with the kitlens only or with the double lens zoom kit...
*
eh, you sold all your stuff? the zoom lens is 40-150mm right? i think the reach not enough..haha..
but with free adapter, its quite worth it. Maybe can sell off 40-150mm and get 70-300mm like me.. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: May 16 2010, 08:38 AM
SUSgogo2
post May 16 2010, 03:08 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(seaotter @ May 16 2010, 08:52 AM)

Added on May 16, 2010, 8:38 am
eh, you sold all your stuff? the zoom lens is 40-150mm right? i think the reach not enough..haha..
but with free adapter, its quite worth it. Maybe can sell off 40-150mm and get 70-300mm like me.. tongue.gif
*



No man. If you checked a few pages behind, you can see that my original pen was stolen sad.gif vmad.gif  shakehead.gif  sad.gif

i am no bird spotter tongue.gif so i think the 150 is just enough for my work type.

Also, imagine a 70-300 equivalant on the NEX series. omg.

i'll stick to m43/43 for now (and ever)
*
if enough, then of course twin lens better value.. smile.gif smile.gif unless you want your PEN to be strictly pancake camera with fixed lens..
tongue.gif
SUSgogo2
post May 16 2010, 10:37 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(FishnChipx @ May 16 2010, 07:30 PM)
har... but it says there is orange colour AF light =.=" sumore up to duno how many feet..lolz..
so it cheat ppl lor ? lolX!
*
The orange AF light is for normal Olympus 43 camera like my E-520...kekeke

QUOTE(frequency @ May 16 2010, 08:18 PM)
Hmmm sharp enuf?

*
so are you ok with the sharpness after increase it to max?

16 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0428sec    0.71    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 03:22 PM