QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Oct 31 2014, 10:33 AM)
Its beautiful...if developer can deliver almost 100% of the rendering design then okay.jpeg... But poblem with mk land brotherhood punya development...design time mmg cantik bombastik...bila dah siap can only achieve 50-60% of the earlier design...hopes the son delivers n break the fatjers voodoo...
noted on your points. but can see that tujuan gemilang ni more geared for high end concept
and i just have personal appreciation for designs, too often developments in malaysia is so bland and boring and smacks of laziness (who can blame developer, do simple design right pricing can sell edi)
but looking at tamarind & pjtc & point 92, interesting la..might not get a perfect result but such effort is commendable
QUOTE(ibbrio @ Oct 31 2014, 12:13 PM)
agree concept of tamarind is different
not being skeptical but a good concept + securing strong tenants will make the place flourish
shaftsbury square is just like normal one stretch of commercial shops up and down and what made it not bad today probably because of the developer in managing the place and tenants? or they being the earliest commercial? not so sure
not saying tamarind will guarantee attract, but it has its own selling point
and shaftsbury is awesome too
and if wanna bash tamarind and pro shaftsbury, get hyve la!
options aplenty