Studio 463 sqf (as it is condition) rent to local  RM1200, foreigner RM1300.

Yes 4-5% is achievable. It is easy to rent out too as the location is one of the more 'wong' area.

credit to the developer...prime land...fast completion/construction, shops already abundant..nice design concept....it beats glomac shoplot project at the traffic junction by a lot currently....;o

How is hard rock café? expect to open in next 3months time after reno?

Shaftsbury definitely winner for flagship commercial development in cj...but as we know we malaysians die die still prefer the traditional design mall with air cond in it...

Can we called shaftsbury a mall? Definitely not...but we can called it a 'commercial plaza'... The only competition for this developmen later is going to be tamarind square...this tamarind oso we camt really called it a mall...

i suggest u make some effort abit on go check the link
http://www.tamarindsq.com/plans.html

do see anything different with shaftsbury concept?
if there is, then that is the answer

Its beautiful...if developer can deliver almost 100% of the rendering design then okay.jpeg... But poblem with mk land brotherhood punya development...design time mmg cantik bombastik...bila dah siap can only achieve 50-60% of the earlier design...hopes the son delivers n break the fatjers voodoo...

My observation that Tamarind Suites and Shaftsbury are different for the following:

1. Time horizon.  They are 5 years apart.  Shaftsbury is current while Tamarind is in the future.  Shaftsbury product is delivered can feel, see and touch.  Tamarind is in picture.  Even that in sales office, nothing to show.
2. Locality.  Shaftsbury is nearer towards the commercial zone while Tamarind is towards MMU end with residential enclaves, both high and low density.  A touch of competition if one wants to rent out.
3. Concept. Tamarind Suites and Square is trying to combine the chill out factors for younger generation, with touch of Alfresco. Focus of greenery and openness.  Cool factors some people call. 
4. Price.  Tamarind is not the cheapest development in Cyber and surrounding.  Not fair to compare Shaftsbury launch price here but subsale is not too far apart.  Check iProperty.
5. Developer ability.  Shaftsbury has delivered.  Tujuan Gemilang has yet to prove.  Current projects of PJTC and Point 92 have the concept but lacks the execution and refinement.  So Risk Factor to be considered.