DUMB FCUK THAT USE CAPS ALL THE WAY,DOES HE KNOWS THAT IT'S EQUIVALENT TO SCREAMING AT PEOPLE??????



Give us whole lot of rubbish,whats the point?

I just want an unrestricted and low ping internet.

If their infrastructure cant support it,why they offer such high speech then?

f***ing overpriced.

You know, someone actually got fired for using caps in their office correspondence.

To me getting pissed off about caps is silly, but it's generally understood when people are capsing they are giving off a bad attitude

i was hoping for 150 for 20mb.. cut throat price.. sialan

heck even my mother scold me when for using cap while writing as its rude

LOL generally i think the cap thing is ok just the freaking PRICE and CAP LIMIT!

Hey all, new here.

Before I start, I am not here to point fingers at anyone cause I think all of us are guilty of some parts of what I say below at some point. This is my general opinion so please don't get all worked up over it.

I really cannot understand what you guys are complaining about. This CAP structure is being used in other places too. I worked in Sydney for close to 4 years. I had an Optus (Singtel jv) 20Mbps link which I had for as long as I lived there. I always had full speed and probably only 2 outages in 4 years. Guess what the CAP was 20GB peak and 40GB off peak.

I worked a lot from home using VPN to various sites. I always found the time to game and did so quite a bit over the weekends. I also downloaded quite a bit of stuff every month on my media centre rig. With the exception of 2 months I never hit the CAP otherwise.

As bad as TM is I am happy for this new launch. Sure the prices could be better (who wants to pay high prices for anything) but I think the CAP is not such a big issue as most of you here are complaining about.

Lets admit it you can't be expecting to download the entire Internet into your local desktop. For every one you there is 10 casual users out there who wont hit the CAP (if they do I stand corrected). We are meant to share the bandwidth not hog it. One of the reasons Streamyx is slow is because of all the P2P hogging out there. You can't set of 10 BT downloads and go out with your GF while some poor bugger in a different part of town is trying to download a 1MB file from Windows update. How is that fair? Sure TM should probably get more International bandwidth but the likelihood of that happening is small at least not anytime soon. In the meantime we should learn to be fair to fellow users.

Honestly think about it for a second, there is 2 many users hogging the line which affects everyone else. I have a Streamyx 4Mbps and at most times its run fine but on weekends during peak hours it can get really slow. Now I wonder why??

On a side note while we ponder about this CAP issue, I am sure there are plenty of applications for Unifi already. Do not underestimate people's need for more Internet, most people just going to close one eye and ignore the CAP.


Cheers!

who posted comment on fesbook?

i pay big bucks and enjoy the unstable high latency non concurrent connection to lag the sh!t outta me?

while fellow users can be fair to each other, when will TMNut will be fair to us as users.

in short, everything is fast.... locally...

everything u mentioned above is useless... becoz it will be same laggy sh!t connecting to international servers

This post has been edited by Instant_noodle: Mar 25 2010, 03:55 PM

we all no culture lah, cos he's the boss so must talk down to us and how else to be arrogant than to use CAPS

ermm only soho got unlimited donload....

This post has been edited by syazone: Mar 25 2010, 03:54 PM

You make some sense. In fact, i agree that cap WILL prevent abuse from excessive downloaders. What i don't agree is with tmnuts definition of what constitutes as an excessive downloader.

This hsbb cap size is too small and unreasonable for the pricing they are asking for.


And another thing, from what i understand, local bandwidth shouldn't be an issue, so why is that counting towards our bandwidth quota ??? Don't you also think that is uneccessary and unfair? Looks to me that they just want to fill up our quota for us as quickly and needlessly as possible

Also your reason for justifying their cap is that our internet will be faster. Well local for sure (although sources say we have plenty of local bandwidth we won't be congested ), but international will not be as fast :/ Don't take my word for it, go ask the beta trialers how fast are speeds to US and Europe



This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Mar 25 2010, 03:59 PM

Purposely joined this site today & post thiis comment?
Are TMnut related?

This post has been edited by kkChan: Mar 25 2010, 03:54 PM

been calling for few hours to subscribe can't get through de..

Got such thing?
I FREAKING DON MIND REALLY!!

Aiyah, you should know how uneducated all out Information Ministers have been. All also don't know anything about mediums for disseminating information from Mr. 'Erection' back in 2007 to YoRais the Ancient.

and offtopic, if you think najib is even humble, well his wife is the exact opposite then :s

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Mar 25 2010, 03:57 PM

i dont mind with the capped things.. because i rarely download..
but the price need to be cheaper..

I think caps are good, but the current caps are too tight.

Double the current bandwidth cap and it would be near perfect.

bear in mind that when u watch HD video in youtube, u are also downloading it = =

Yeap Compare the 1mbps package i am using now which is RM88 thts like a double+ of the price.
Yet yet major concern is can it be smooth?
Most of us worried abt the CAP but seems we havn have concern on how "CONSISTENT" the connection will be?
Well i am from seri kembangan lol my area need like Q4 of this year only available

i wont subscribe this until the remove the cap...