QUOTE(achong88 @ Apr 22 2010, 10:07 AM)
Hi. Please note that impact factor classification of high and low depends on the field as well. International Journal of Production Economics (IJPE) has an impact factor of more than 2.0 but less than 3 but it is considered one of the top journal in its field. Yes, I am referring to ranked A or B journals. I did saw a news article from the UM VC saying they are looking at tier 1 journals, and the tier is based on the field, e.g. go to web of science, check the field of specialization, and look at the top whatever percent to rank the tier 1 journal in that field. But I stand corrected.
Anyway, an article that takes more than a year to review does shows that the reviewers are stringent, but hardly makes the journal's practise as being good as the turnaround time is too low. For IT field, if a paper takes a year to review, another year to get published, the area might be outdated. I am not trying to start off with a debate or something. This is my opinion and as an academician, I am sure some will agree or disagree with me. Anyhow, I think Malaysian universities looking at ISI is already a start. Malaysia is a developing country, we are not US, UK, HK, Australia etc. How do we be like that if we don't start?
If the reply is meant to check if my articles are all in impact factor of less than 1, then is not true. But I don't think I need to list all my publications here

And of course, I agree that we should also try getting work experience in overseas which is why I am leaving to HK Uni in a few months' time. Hope that in a few years time, I can gain better research experience and contrinute to Malaysia.
We should not be just criticizing all the time. E.g. Someone wins an olympic medal, then we just say so what, in US, so many gold medals.. etc. Be positive, and Malaysian universities looking at ISI is a great start whereby one day we might be classify as on par with unis in countries such as US, UK etc.
achong88, I bet to differ. Let me share my observation:
1. Malaysian universities spend about RM200,000 per year sending their BUMIPUTRA staff to do PhD at overseas. NON-BUMIPUTRA staff are only considered in rare cases.
2. If you are a staff in a public university with a Master degree, chances are you remain as a tutor, the BUMIPUTRA students that you taught several years ago becomes lecturer with a PhD degree from overseas sponsored by the university. Are you willing to take this???
3. Hence, promotion are only given to BUMIPUTRA. Non-Bumiputras are only promoted in rare cases.
4. What I mentioned above are RULE OF THUMB, the unspoken events happening in public universities although non-Bumi are NOT DISCRIMINATED as according to the Universities.
Don't even compare Malaysia with US, not even our close neighbour in Singapore. Far be it for us to achieve their accomplishment. We are just syok sendiri! Look at the high impact journals from Singapore yourself please.
Added on April 22, 2010, 1:16 pmQUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 22 2010, 11:01 AM)
achong88,
Or, be STUPID. Unless and until NEP is abolished, it will continue to slide down to IRRELEVANCE..
It has been going down for the past 30+ years while the neighboring countries are improving. Let's NOT even talk about USA and UK. We are not keeping up with Thailand and Indonesia.
<<Be positive, and Malaysian universities looking at ISI is a great start >>
Why bother when they keep paying ex-pat salary to FOREIGNER while rejecting qualified Malaysians??
Why bother when the promotion is still based on skin color??
Dreamer
Dreamer,
What make you think that NEP is the root cause? Nah... there are too many unspoken rules where the Vice Chancellor, Dean and Head of Department are biased against Non-Bumi. I have seen this myself. NEP abolished or stay are the same!
Malaysia has been getting worst since early 2000. We are heading nowhere.
This is the reason why I choose to remain overseas, an dhope to move to Singapore someday.
This post has been edited by futuristicwiz: Apr 22 2010, 01:25 PM