Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
156 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography [PIC-A-Day Thread] Post your daily shots here! V5, A Pictar A Day Keeps Da Fungus Away! (:

views
     
aLittleMisfit
post Apr 12 2010, 08:52 PM

Honorary Lifetime Misfit
*****
Senior Member
886 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: MSG Land


user posted image

Camera Model - Canon 550d
Lens - Sigma 18-125mm
Aperture - F/8
Shutter Speed - 1/200
Focal Lenght - 125mm
ISO - 1000

Not really outstanding.. but just first post with new toy tongue.gif

edit forgot post picture doh.gif

This post has been edited by aLittleMisfit: Apr 12 2010, 08:53 PM
leetplayer
post Apr 12 2010, 09:29 PM

O'le
*****
Senior Member
984 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Here and There.


QUOTE(Vincent Pang @ Apr 12 2010, 05:44 PM)
thanks
wow, that was real close, did u blind the model ?
*
The model is myself brows.gif
fishnoxygen
post Apr 12 2010, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Vault 111
QUOTE(noprob @ Apr 12 2010, 08:06 PM)
fishnoxygen,
Good work bro !
*
Thanks smile.gif

QUOTE(mastering89 @ Apr 12 2010, 08:48 PM)
Sakura in Yokohama
*
Underexposed.

This post has been edited by fishnoxygen: Apr 12 2010, 10:17 PM
waggygee
post Apr 12 2010, 11:51 PM

Casual
***
Senior Member
499 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Turkey


I decided to edit a random picture I took a while ago, I think it turned out ok
user posted image
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Belouvre
post Apr 13 2010, 01:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(fishnoxygen @ Apr 12 2010, 10:16 PM)
Thanks smile.gif
Underexposed.
*
Does underexposed means tune the aperture to a higher bit?
waggygee
post Apr 13 2010, 01:49 AM

Casual
***
Senior Member
499 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Turkey


QUOTE(Belouvre @ Apr 13 2010, 01:36 AM)
Does underexposed means tune the aperture to a higher bit?
*
In your case, i think its not so severe so you can easily correct it using a software. but if you want to fix it immediately off the camera, I usually do it by adjusting ISO or shutter speed. I am a beginner, maybe someone more pro can advise too
fishnoxygen
post Apr 13 2010, 02:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Vault 111
QUOTE(Belouvre @ Apr 13 2010, 01:36 AM)
Does underexposed means tune the aperture to a higher bit?
*
Bump up ISO and use slower shutter speed would suffice.
Personally I'd use a slower shutter speed for that photo.
Don't have to bother about aperture cause you would still want to retain the DoF of the object you are shooting.
Well, it depends on situation tho.

QUOTE(waggygee @ Apr 13 2010, 01:49 AM)
In your case, i think its not so severe so you can easily correct it using a software. but if you want to fix it immediately off the camera, I usually do it by adjusting ISO or shutter speed. I am a beginner, maybe someone more pro can advise too
*
Yea I agree that post-processing should fix the the photo in no time.
HotChocolate
post Apr 13 2010, 02:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
452 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: ChocoLand


QUOTE(mastering89 @ Apr 12 2010, 08:48 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Mind resizing or spoiler your picture?
Anyway, shutter speed don't have to be that quick.
When metering, make sure its exposure is 0ev, unless the situation fools the meter in the camera.
Then adjustment should be made based on that.
0168257061
post Apr 13 2010, 03:48 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(DEVICLOT @ Apr 12 2010, 12:51 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Camera:  Canon EOS 400D Digital
Exposure:  0.05 sec (1/20)
Aperture:  f/2.8
Focal Length:  50 mm
ISO Speed:  1600
Exposure Bias:  0 EV
*
user posted image

Camera: Canon EOS 1000D
Exposure: 0.067 sec (1/15)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 42 mm
Exposure Bias: -2/3 EV
ISO Speed: 800

restaurant sama
etigge
post Apr 13 2010, 03:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
295 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(waggygee @ Apr 12 2010, 11:51 PM)
I decided to edit a random picture I took a while ago, I think it turned out ok 
user posted image
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Looks good enough for a Deepavali greeting card. Nice.
waggygee
post Apr 13 2010, 04:04 AM

Casual
***
Senior Member
499 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Turkey


QUOTE(etigge @ Apr 13 2010, 03:59 AM)
Looks good enough for a Deepavali greeting card. Nice.
*
wow! thanks! notworthy.gif
mastering89
post Apr 13 2010, 06:48 AM

miao miao
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Cyberjaya
Mt Fuji
user posted image
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

fishnoxygen
post Apr 13 2010, 08:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Vault 111
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Apr 13 2010, 06:48 AM)
Mt Fuji
*
Again, underexposed.
The black thing on the left is distracting. CS5 content-aware fill can easily fix that.
Cropping at 16:9 / 16:10 would be much better.

This post has been edited by fishnoxygen: Apr 13 2010, 08:09 AM
r3kahsttub
post Apr 13 2010, 08:48 AM

IG: @MTHRFKNWIN
*******
Senior Member
2,278 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
user posted image
Sony DSC-TX7
Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/640)
Aperture: f/6.3
Focal Length: 4.4 mm
ISO Speed: 125
Exposure Bias: 0 EV

user posted image
Sony DSC-TX7
Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/500)
Aperture: f/6.3
Focal Length: 4.4 mm
ISO Speed: 125
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
HotChocolate
post Apr 13 2010, 11:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
452 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: ChocoLand


QUOTE(mastering89 @ Apr 13 2010, 06:48 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I think your metering choice is wrong, try others next time.
If problem still persist, maybe you should up your exposure bias.

QUOTE(fishnoxygen @ Apr 13 2010, 08:08 AM)
Again, underexposed.
The black thing on the left is distracting. CS5 content-aware fill can easily fix that.
Cropping at 16:9 / 16:10 would be much better.
*
brows.gif brows.gif
Wa, ini cepat ada wang beli CS5.
leetplayer
post Apr 13 2010, 12:19 PM

O'le
*****
Senior Member
984 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Here and There.


Om nom nom nom nom
user posted image

500D
1/160
11
ISO 200
100mm
Flash fired.

fcuk90
post Apr 13 2010, 12:22 PM

ef eg ek es
*******
Senior Member
7,863 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: highbury


user posted image

Exposure: 0.008 sec (1/125)
Aperture: f/5.0
Focal Length: 38 mm
Focal Length: 38.9 mm
ISO Speed: 400
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: On, Return detected
ReeNz
post Apr 13 2010, 04:14 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



user posted image

D90 | f/8 | 1/1250 sec | 70mm | iso 560

user posted image

D90 | f/8 | 1/1250 sec | 300mm | iso 640

This post has been edited by ReeNz: Apr 13 2010, 04:38 PM
mastering89
post Apr 13 2010, 04:20 PM

miao miao
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Cyberjaya
fishnoxygen : i usually used centered metering... sweat.gif
if landscape photography should i juz used matrix metering???
or better take 3 exposure and blend in all

HotChocolate : most of shots i juz used the Aperture mode...
i still dont know how and what is the "correct exposure", which metering mode to use,

This post has been edited by mastering89: Apr 13 2010, 04:56 PM
DJFoo000
post Apr 13 2010, 04:38 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



My shots of the day:

user posted image
f/2.5, 1/4000, ISO100, 50mm, PP-ed


user posted image
f/2.0, 1/2500, ISO100, 50mm, cropped, PP-ed
Is this underexposed?





156 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0327sec    0.60    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 07:46 PM