QUOTE(kenji1903 @ Jan 29 2010, 06:44 PM)
assuming 450km from a 50l tank... its about 11.1l/100km...
my City VTEC is 550km for 42l (assuming i really empty the tank)... 7.6l/100km...
8km/100km is quite good but 11km/100km? Forte's FC almost 50% more than City VTEC?
dude.. mine 1.6 clock 550KM (if really empty the tank in mixed city and highway)
forte's full tank is 52 but pump stop the fuel at 49L only.
550KM/49L = 11.23KM/L = 8.9L/100KM
and bear in mind that is mixed of easy driving and crazy driving (on 50% city and 50% highway)
if 100% highway driving with grandma driving style can get 700KM over.. (got Singaporean who manage to clock this once)
Added on January 30, 2010, 9:19 amQUOTE(keeting89 @ Jan 29 2010, 11:38 PM)
However, the forte which i view inside the showroom was not exactly what i saw on the internet..Don wan comment too much if not i will kena flame..lol
haha.. dude.. pics on internet is for 2.0 interior.. dont confuse especially on cushion one
Added on January 30, 2010, 9:26 amQUOTE(sugen @ Jan 30 2010, 07:13 AM)
No body try shell one meh? As it gave extra 1 LITER...
hahaha. don't want kena conned. already try shell not satisfy. prefer petronas over shell. and prefer Caltex and BHP over petronas.
haven't use mobil/esso yet
QUOTE(izputra @ Jan 30 2010, 08:54 AM)
To those who can recall. this guy still have a guts to condemn on us Forte (KIA) buyers. u know who i meant right? :Â Â
http://kereta.info/new-kia-forte-in-malaysia/#commentsSo..anyone? hehe...
still bash ka? hahaha. i already bash him back last time. poor fella.
QUOTE(izputra @ Jan 30 2010, 08:58 AM)
& this guy also..already angry with us u knowÂ

 :
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1302647/+20He's the one who hijack our thread first & dare to say bad thing about our decision to buy Forte (KIA)..including CBU & CKD thingy...
hahaha.. i also like to flame him
This post has been edited by iluvena: Jan 30 2010, 11:40 AM