QUOTE(fansoption @ Dec 27 2009, 07:33 PM)
wires??where??
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V35!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 07:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 08:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 08:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy |
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 08:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Dec 27 2009, 08:04 PM) aiyo..im trying to show him what he could have done ma...spent like 30sec on it only..haha....and most importantly..i just woke up from my 10hours sleep..still pretty blur now..lolAdded on December 27, 2009, 8:07 pm QUOTE(bysquashy @ Dec 27 2009, 08:05 PM) if u inspect the shot carefully..even u nv see orig shot..u'd able to find something strange..lol..there r too many duplicated pattern coz im lazy..lolThis post has been edited by achew: Dec 27 2009, 08:07 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 08:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(bysquashy @ Dec 27 2009, 08:05 PM) QUOTE(achew @ Dec 27 2009, 08:06 PM) aiyo..im trying to show him what he could have done ma...spent like 30sec on it only..haha....and most importantly..i just woke up from my 10hours sleep..still pretty blur now..lol yeap, like achew said, i find something strange at some line there.. haha, btw i understand achew just show some idea to fansoption to cloning some unwanted line there.. to make the his picture perfect Added on December 27, 2009, 8:07 pm if u inspect the shot carefully..even u nv see orig shot..u'd able to find something strange..lol..there r too many duplicated pattern coz im lazy..lol |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 08:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
hahaha!
Added on December 27, 2009, 8:36 pmPic Spam Add-On ![]() 75mm-300mm still can closeup woh hehe! This post has been edited by fansoption: Dec 27 2009, 08:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 09:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,185 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: KKinabalu |
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 10:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
guys..any comment on this sandisk ultra CF??
http://shashinki.com/shop/sandisk-ultra-co...facturers_id=27 feel like buying a CF..but not sure whether i can feel any diff on 30mb/s or just the normal one would do.. |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 10:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 27 2009, 10:27 PM) guys..any comment on this sandisk ultra CF?? a normal 133x CF is 20mb/s....so do u wanna have another 10mb/s??http://shashinki.com/shop/sandisk-ultra-co...facturers_id=27 feel like buying a CF..but not sure whether i can feel any diff on 30mb/s or just the normal one would do.. if yes then go for it...really necessary for the one who use drive mode a lot.... |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 10:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Dec 27 2009, 10:34 PM) a normal 133x CF is 20mb/s....so do u wanna have another 10mb/s?? i know its 50% faster than the usual 133x..but what i mean is..if the difference significant enough for the user to feel it?? 0.0001s is 10 times faster than 0.00001s..but i don think i could "feel" any diff there..hope u get what i mean..if yes then go for it...really necessary for the one who use drive mode a lot.... erm..yea..i do use the drive mode often(infact i use it like 90% of the time) as i tend to have 2-3 shots together to avoid eyes blinking.. |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: there |
i think u better get the better one. hehe..
I have the 8GB Kingston 133x. Damn slow on my A200. much better at A700. but I still can feel the lag compare to my 300x card. The lag only felt when i do review after shooting. I guess it;s partially due to the buffer on the camera make the lag not so obvious when doing burst shoot (For the 1st few pic at least), not sure if u burst until the buffer run out, coz i don do that.. btw.. better buy the san disk at Sg during Fair.. I put up the price compare for SG/MY PC fair HERE This post has been edited by hkhk: Dec 27 2009, 11:14 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(hkhk @ Dec 27 2009, 11:05 PM) i think u better get the better one. hehe.. heres a very weird case i found out with my frens....I have the 8GB Kingston 133x. Damn slow on my A200. much better at A700. but I still can feel the lag compare to my 300x card. btw.. better buy the san disk at Sg during fair.. i show u the price later. we both have a 8GB 133x CF from Kingston,transcend and sony.... it means they should have similar writing and reading speed right?? we did with a few small tests while one was the time for the picture to read into the card and enable the user to delete the pictures.... we shot a picture using a200 and press delete button until the picture is allow to be deleted... kingston need 9 seconds to be deleted while transcend is 3 seconds.... in other tests the kingstons also recorded the slowest among the others... |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:16 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
marauderz: Just to be sure, were you shooting JPG? If you were, then you can say that the screen couldn't display purple. If you were shooting RAW then we cannot say for sure that the screen cannot display purple as the RAW processor will have a different idea of WB and how to extract color.
SpOOkY: It's the color gamut. Purple is made of red and blue. It is plainly due to the camera's tendency to underexpose because it sees Full Blue (255) but and stops exposing there. If it exposes longer, blue will be clipped but red and green can come out. Same thing for red - cameras tend to underexpose if it sees blown red, losing the green and blue channels. You can of course pull out the missing channels. finejava: No there isn't, the smartest conversion is still up to you. SHOfrE3zE: Nice geometry! fansoption: Read my earlier reply to you! I will not post it again. This post has been edited by albnok: Dec 27 2009, 11:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: there |
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Dec 27 2009, 11:15 PM) heres a very weird case i found out with my frens.... yup.. my Kingston 133x 8GB also take such long time on the A200 for deleting a photo. But on A700 is much faster.we both have a 8GB 133x CF from Kingston,transcend and sony.... it means they should have similar writing and reading speed right?? we did with a few small tests while one was the time for the picture to read into the card and enable the user to delete the pictures.... we shot a picture using a200 and press delete button until the picture is allow to be deleted... kingston need 9 seconds to be deleted while transcend is 3 seconds.... in other tests the kingstons also recorded the slowest among the others... I assume that particular Kingston 133x 8GB might have compatibility issue with A200. Actually I intended to bundle the 8GB card with my A200 when i sell it, but when i realize such a slow speed.. its not suitable to bundle it else the buyer might think the camera got problem. I tried to use the 133x 8GB on card reader. it works fine, the speed is rather fast and acceptable. I have another pc of kINGSTON 133x 4GB, haven;t open the seal. I hope there is no such issue on A200.. This post has been edited by hkhk: Dec 27 2009, 11:22 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:31 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
![]() |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
397 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There... |
QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 27 2009, 02:56 AM) Braynumb: I think you're going around in circles being silly lah. Just get the beercan. The 100-200mm F4.5 is the closest you've ever had to it, but with a weaker range. hehehe...tell me about it... well, decided to get the 55200 instead... so far so good... now just waiting for more time to spend shooting with it. |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
394 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
hey guys pls advice me...did i did in correct way?
![]() 50mm lens F1.8, no flash f/1.8, 1/125, ISO 1600, Metering mode, pattern WB: Tungsten -1 |
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 12:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
on my screen seems like ur pic is underexpose bro...i like the light bokeh...
|
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 01:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,850 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
HAPPY BELATED CHRISTMAS!!!! hahaha.. n oso ALPHA V35!!!
Just complete one job (no pay) taking my friend's wedding yesterday from morning 6am to 11pm... now legs are in pain cause squat a lot.. n my right hand is shaking...Good experience though.. i have been waiting for this kind of experience for sometime. I am just the backup photographer. The main photographer is a more experience canon user, groom's relative. So many time i have to give priority for the main photographer n Videographer... & there are time when i missed the best moment The night dinner in restaurant is still tricky with the lighting... still couldnt get the exact right way. I should get myself a colour gel.. Now i get all weird weird inconsistent white balance.... I brought my A100 along too but end up not using it... cause feel like all my photos taken r Blur, i think is the lcd resolution make me think so... n oso iso performance..Only can use 50mm f1.4 on it. So I carry my A100 with me so i can swap lens when needed.. i think i need to get a lowepro lens side pocket next time.. most of d time i just put my lens on the table n everywhere after i changed d lens.. so dangerous.... Really wish to take more wedding photos... any 1 needs backup assistant can ask me... for free Will post some photos here to share after im done editing them all... got almost 20GB of photos...1500 photos~ |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0240sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:28 PM |