Nikon D90 v5
Nikon D90 v5
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: PJ / Puchong |
Hye guys, u guys have any idea how to upgrade flickr to flickr pro? I want to upgrade mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 12:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,469 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
hey saw a lot of ppl selling their kit lense i was wondering why hmm.. my fren says the lense isn't sharp enuff. is it true?
anyway pic spam. C & C please. ![]() |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 12:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: PJ / Puchong |
QUOTE(Klesk @ Dec 19 2009, 12:36 AM) hey saw a lot of ppl selling their kit lense i was wondering why hmm.. my fren says the lense isn't sharp enuff. is it true? u edit the picture to look soft? no need la anyway pic spam. C & C please. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « My recent photo! ![]() ![]() Didnt bring my cpl filter, so the ring doesnt look nice This post has been edited by faiz92: Dec 19 2009, 12:43 AM |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 01:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(Inspiration~ @ Dec 18 2009, 09:27 PM) just +/- it isnt it?QUOTE(Klesk @ Dec 19 2009, 12:36 AM) hey saw a lot of ppl selling their kit lense i was wondering why hmm.. my fren says the lense isn't sharp enuff. is it true? Depends what are u comparing lo. Honestly the kit lens (18-105) is a very very good lens as compared to many kitlens...(not the FF kit lenses!)anyway pic spam. C & C please. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 06:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Dec 18 2009, 11:42 PM) my current set still satisfied with it. just need to add 116 QUOTE(Inspiration~ @ Dec 18 2009, 09:27 PM) press menu> shooting menu >set picture control > choose any > saturationremember press right key on navigation instead of 'ok' button Added on December 19, 2009, 6:15 am QUOTE(faiz92 @ Dec 19 2009, 12:42 AM) u edit the picture to look soft? no need la wonder what dat filter can do?My recent photo! » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Didnt bring my cpl filter, so the ring doesnt look nice This post has been edited by Isepunye: Dec 19 2009, 06:15 AM |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 08:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 08:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: PJ / Puchong |
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Dec 19 2009, 06:14 AM) my current set to reduce reflection right? so that i can get more details of the diamond, correct me if im wrong still satisfied with it. just need to add 116 press menu> shooting menu >set picture control > choose any > saturation remember press right key on navigation instead of 'ok' button Added on December 19, 2009, 6:15 am wonder what dat filter can do? |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 10:50 AM
|
|
Elite
2,163 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the muddy banks of the wishkah!! |
Im planning to buy new SB 600 ( x tahan kene poisened) & 8GB SD card
can someone suggest me what is the best price we can get for SB600 plus the 8GB SD card, I currently using kit lens 18-105mm + 50mm 1.8... do you think this lens is good enuf for beginner like me.. I love to shoot potrait + outdoor pictures,... |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 03:37 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: May 2009 |
QUOTE(BaRT @ Dec 19 2009, 10:50 AM) Im planning to buy new SB 600 ( x tahan kene poisened) & 8GB SD card Honestly, i think those two lens are sufficient to cover all your photography needs!! i started my journey with only 50mm 1.8 lens not so long ago. it covers my everyday photography until i've gotten myself the 35mm 1.8 can someone suggest me what is the best price we can get for SB600 plus the 8GB SD card, I currently using kit lens 18-105mm + 50mm 1.8... do you think this lens is good enuf for beginner like me.. I love to shoot potrait + outdoor pictures,... Pic spam frm my recent visit to langkawi, #1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 05:03 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
244 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
ermm...in tht case i will keep my 18-105mm after hearing opinions from u guys..thanks..... anyway...thinking of getting 50mm too...but the seller said no need buy d coz can even use the Photoshop to create such effect.So I decided not to buy. But my question is, is this lense really powerful in low light shooting as it cn go to 1.8...and is it really good for portrait also?compare to the kitlens? if yes, I might re-consider on buying it....
Added on December 19, 2009, 5:05 pm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « nice ...great color and sharp..... This post has been edited by invisibl3boyz: Dec 19 2009, 05:06 PM |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 05:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
QUOTE(invisibl3boyz @ Dec 19 2009, 05:03 PM) ermm...in tht case i will keep my 18-105mm after hearing opinions from u guys..thanks..... anyway...thinking of getting 50mm too...but the seller said no need buy d coz can even use the Photoshop to create such effect.So I decided not to buy. But my question is, is this lense really powerful in low light shooting as it cn go to 1.8...and is it really good for portrait also?compare to the kitlens? if yes, I might re-consider on buying it.... the seller can be right and wrong. it is possible to create bokeh in photoshop but it will not look as good as real and tell me, how are u gonna photoshop every single pic? that would take a lot of time rite? The f/1.8 u're getting would be good for low light and portrait. Good for low light coz or big aperture and good for portrait because of shallow depth-of-field. that's why they hav other primes like 85mm, etc. Stop it down a little maybe to f/2 or f/2.8, and it'll be super sharp.Added on December 19, 2009, 5:05 pm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « nice ...great color and sharp..... |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 05:58 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
143 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: 3°N101°E |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 06:18 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: May 2009 |
QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 19 2009, 05:54 PM) the seller can be right and wrong. it is possible to create bokeh in photoshop but it will not look as good as real and tell me, how are u gonna photoshop every single pic? that would take a lot of time rite? The f/1.8 u're getting would be good for low light and portrait. Good for low light coz or big aperture and good for portrait because of shallow depth-of-field. that's why they hav other primes like 85mm, etc. Stop it down a little maybe to f/2 or f/2.8, and it'll be super sharp. i couldnt agree more with fisherman. the great dof and low light performance offered by fast lens are the main reasons why people sought after primes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 06:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
QUOTE(@rleng @ Dec 19 2009, 03:37 PM) Honestly, i think those two lens are sufficient to cover all your photography needs!! i started my journey with only 50mm 1.8 lens not so long ago. it covers my everyday photography until i've gotten myself the 35mm 1.8 Using 35mm 1.8? Wow it's so sharp Pic spam frm my recent visit to langkawi, » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 06:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
311 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
many questions here regarding the next gear to get after having only kit lense... from my 2 cents opinion, what should u do before upgrade is maximise ur lense.. use it at all aperture, att all shutterspeed.. mostkit lense also can do bokeh with correct aperture and shutterspeed.. dulu i pakai 18-135mm only to create such bokeh.. rather than spending on new lense, get urself a good flash.. ( SB600/800/900 or 3rd party like nissin di622/866).. then bought urself a nice cheapo but great nikkor 50mm f 1.8d ( RM 390) or 35mm f 1.8 ( rm780).. good lense for walkabout and potrait.. then, sudah jemu dengan kitlense baru carik tele or f2.8 lense..
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 07:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: PJ / Puchong |
Guys, do u notice that people that use flickr have more shaper and nicer picture than people who upload using image shack?
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 08:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
311 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
yerp... flickr nice.. picasaweb also not nice.. i never use imageshack.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 08:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: May 2009 |
QUOTE(faiz92 @ Dec 19 2009, 07:56 PM) Guys, do u notice that people that use flickr have more shaper and nicer picture than people who upload using image shack? i do not think that the pic is getting sharper, but it's more like the sharpness and details of the original photo are retained. Neway, i noticed that the blue/purple/maroon will be slightly OFF when i host it on flickr. |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 09:10 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
244 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 19 2009, 05:54 PM) the seller can be right and wrong. it is possible to create bokeh in photoshop but it will not look as good as real and tell me, how are u gonna photoshop every single pic? that would take a lot of time rite? The f/1.8 u're getting would be good for low light and portrait. Good for low light coz or big aperture and good for portrait because of shallow depth-of-field. that's why they hav other primes like 85mm, etc. Stop it down a little maybe to f/2 or f/2.8, and it'll be super sharp. thanx fisherman..... nw im clear bout it.... true also.....with this lense, might no need alot editing in photoshop, save time...haha.... i think i'll go for it....cheers..... |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 09:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(invisibl3boyz @ Dec 19 2009, 05:03 PM) ermm...in tht case i will keep my 18-105mm after hearing opinions from u guys..thanks..... anyway...thinking of getting 50mm too...but the seller said no need buy d coz can even use the Photoshop to create such effect.So I decided not to buy. But my question is, is this lense really powerful in low light shooting as it cn go to 1.8...and is it really good for portrait also?compare to the kitlens? if yes, I might re-consider on buying it.... 1st, the seller is damn honest wei..Added on December 19, 2009, 5:05 pm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « nice ...great color and sharp..... ok, when do i use my 50mm? 1) When I want more bokeh... 2) almost 0 distortion 3) when i have enough space to move around did it help? when u say lo-light, how low? it depends....bigger aperture certainly helps but to what extend?hope u get it,. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0284sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 05:52 AM |