Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Hardware CPU comparison list
|
amunriel
|
Dec 5 2009, 02:42 AM
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBCglId1OdE"Incredibly realistic gaming Dive into a deeply immersive gaming experience with a 31% improvement in artificial intelligence for game characters and realistic physics for game worlds." - quoted from Intel I reckon we should go for Core i7 to be future proof and better multitasking http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=433033
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 5 2009, 11:25 AM
|
|
no, i won't trust Intel for that...
the key is still optimization... and i doubt game developers really like HTT... juz look at how it failed in Pentium 4...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene91
|
Dec 5 2009, 12:40 PM
|
|
really it is weird.. Every thread I found in Notebookreview..
Asus G51J i7, SXPS 16 i7, and 8940G i7, all of them praising Corei7 lol..
I guess its the different applications of the i7 processor they use and we use?
|
|
|
|
|
|
weirdguy
|
Dec 5 2009, 12:50 PM
|
|
Therefore, what are your recommendation, guys?
I am planning to purchase laptop - Dell Studio 15 during the PIKOM FAIR Online
After I gone through all the post of this topic, I am still not sure whether to go for C2D or i7?
The Laptop Usage will be mainly internet, word processing, App Development, and lastly - definitely some great games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 5 2009, 12:57 PM
|
|
if u can afford Studio 15 with i7, i suggest Studio XPS 16 with Core 2 Duo or Acer 5935G with GT 240M instead...
for games, priority always go to GPU...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene91
|
Dec 5 2009, 01:42 PM
|
|
true true.. since now maybe in 2 years to come even the i7 will not be fully utilised.. Go for Higher Clocked Core 2 Duo
|
|
|
|
|
|
outlife11
|
Dec 5 2009, 02:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Dec 5 2009, 01:42 PM) true true.. since now maybe in 2 years to come even the i7 will not be fully utilised.. Go for Higher Clocked Core 2 Duo but seems graphic user prefer i7 n it work really well on editing program ! higher clocked c2d still costly(i mean laptop)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene91
|
Dec 5 2009, 03:22 PM
|
|
Wait for core i5 better.. At least the clocks are 2.26/2.4/2.66GHz dual-core. Replacements of the Core 2 Duo  With HTT and Turbo Boost
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 5 2009, 04:08 PM
|
|
well, i dun think Core i5 and Core i7 dual will be cheap either...
|
|
|
|
|
|
amunriel
|
Dec 5 2009, 08:45 PM
|
|
well I reckon core i7 920 is overkill but core i7 720 is priced for value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Docter
|
Dec 5 2009, 09:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(amunriel @ Dec 5 2009, 08:45 PM) well I reckon core i7 920 is overkill but core i7 720 is priced for value. what value? for gaming?  Added on December 5, 2009, 9:18 pmQUOTE(Eugene91 @ Dec 5 2009, 03:22 PM) Wait for core i5 better.. At least the clocks are 2.26/2.4/2.66GHz dual-core. Replacements of the Core 2 Duo  With HTT and Turbo Boost  thats mean i5 will have 2 thread? just like C2D? This post has been edited by Mr.Docter: Dec 5 2009, 09:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 5 2009, 09:19 PM
|
|
value would be Core i3...
dun forget, the way that Intel markets the CPU now is:
hardcore - Core i7 Performance - Core i5 Mainstream - Core i3 Value - Pentium
with the lack of Pentium in the line up, i reckon Core 2 will make up for the Value market for the time being...
|
|
|
|
|
|
outlife11
|
Dec 7 2009, 12:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(astria @ Dec 2 2009, 09:42 PM) 1 core - 2.8GHz 2 cores - approx. 2.4GHz iirc... 4 cores - 1.6GHz for games, juz stick to C2Q or high clock C2D how bout i7 820QM ? 1 core - 3.0GHz 2 cores - 4 cores -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Docter
|
Dec 10 2009, 07:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(outlife11 @ Dec 7 2009, 12:06 PM) how bout i7 820QM ? 1 core - 3.0GHz 2 cores - 4 cores - just a bit improvement from 720 which is almost no difference in term of real usage. but for sure a slight increment when benchmarking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 10 2009, 07:09 PM
|
|
well, the main difference on the 820QM would be the larger cache...
|
|
|
|
|
|
outlife11
|
Dec 11 2009, 12:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(astria @ Dec 10 2009, 07:09 PM) well, the main difference on the 820QM would be the larger cache... what the advantage with large cache? n thank solving my question so far
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 11 2009, 12:40 PM
|
|
not significant unless u re doing works that involve lots of transfer of small files...
but heck 8MB is juz total overkill for normal users...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Docter
|
Dec 11 2009, 07:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Racerx @ Dec 11 2009, 01:01 AM) me thinks it's bottleneck too.that's a dual hd5870 that is even bottlenecked by a 4ghz bloomfield,of course you'll feel it more with your 3.4ghz deneb [like a 965be,it still loses to a 2.66ghz i5 750]  regarding to the bolded statement. i still do not understand. isn't it Phenom2 X4 965 is Quad core, and i5 750 is Dual core? if yes, then why 965 still lose to 15 750?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Dec 11 2009, 09:27 PM
|
|
i5 700 series is a quad with no HTT...
anyway, it's no secret that high end multi GPU system would cause the CPU to be bottlenecked...
|
|
|
|
|
|
outlife11
|
Dec 17 2009, 10:48 AM
|
|
astria what the next mobile Core CPU coming ?
|
|
|
|
|