QUOTE(LokiD.d.G @ Nov 27 2009, 05:13 AM)
so i7 920XM still slightly better than QX9300 ??Added on November 27, 2009, 5:03 pmi5 is 35nm tech with i7 45nm ??
This post has been edited by Dackson: Nov 27 2009, 05:03 PM
Hardware CPU comparison list
|
|
Nov 27 2009, 04:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,439 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Mlc to PP ? |
QUOTE(LokiD.d.G @ Nov 27 2009, 05:13 AM) so i7 920XM still slightly better than QX9300 ??Added on November 27, 2009, 5:03 pmi5 is 35nm tech with i7 45nm ?? This post has been edited by Dackson: Nov 27 2009, 05:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2009, 06:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
i5 also 45nm...
i3 and new Pentium are 32nm... |
|
|
Nov 27 2009, 09:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2009, 10:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
from the info i have gathered around the Internet lately, the highly anticipated mainstream mobile Core i5 is NOT a quad core... rather, it will be based on Arrandale instead of Clarksfield...
from Wikipedia, the Core i5 is a dual core with integrated GMA HD graphic... there will be 2 lines, the 500M series and 400M series... both lines will have the graphic controller clocked at 733MHz, but the 400M series will not have HTT... there's also the Core i3 300M series, which has both HTT and Turbo Boost disabled, and graphic is clocked at 667MHz only as well... and to make it even more complicated, there's also the Core i7 600M series, which looks no different from a Core i5 500M on paper, besides having the highest clock in the Arrandale family... the rated TDP of all the above CPU are 35W... a pretty big improvement over Core 2 Duo (35W TDP for T series), considering it has 2 cores, a graphic controller and memory controller built into a chip... compared to the desktop version, here's a table for ur convenience (comparison in terms of spec) Desktop vs Mobile Core i5 600 - Core i5 500M, Core i7 600M Core i3 500 - Core i5 400M Pentium G6000 - Core i3 300M This post has been edited by astria: Nov 30 2009, 10:15 PM |
|
|
Nov 30 2009, 10:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
i really need time to digest that
|
|
|
Dec 1 2009, 01:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
simply say...
Core i7-900XM (quad Extreme Edition, 8MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, >45W) Core i7-800QM (quad, 8MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 45W) Core i7-700QM (quad, 6MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 45W) Core i7-600M (dual with 766MHz graphic, 4MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 35W) Core i7-600LM (dual with 533MHz graphic, 4MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 25W) - aka Low Voltage Core i7-600UM (dual with 500MHz graphic, 4MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 18W) - aka Ultra Low Voltage Core i5-500M (dual with 766MHz graphic, 3MB L3 cache, HTT and Turbo Boost, 35W) Core i5-400M (dual with 766MHz graphic, 3MB L3 cache, , no HTT, Turbo Boost only, 35W) Core i3-300M (dual with 667MHz graphic, 3MB L3 cache, no HTT, no Turbo Boost. 35W) these are wat will be available for the new Core family... as for mobo, the quads are using PM55 now, while the duals should be HM55... Added on December 1, 2009, 1:58 ami am sort of surprised by the lack of Pentium in the whole product line... This post has been edited by astria: Dec 1 2009, 01:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2009, 06:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,648 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: Twixt nether and ether |
Interesting preliminary prices have emerged for three Arrandale processors. Fudzilla has the details.
|
|
|
Dec 1 2009, 08:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,439 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Mlc to PP ? |
huh ...
waiting i7 become cheap and command ^^ |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
349 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: USJ/Subang Jaya |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 12:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 12:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
349 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: USJ/Subang Jaya |
ic... is that mean i can take full control of 4 core ?
if use 2 core = 2.8Ghz/2 = roughly 1.4Ghz per core ? |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 02:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,648 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: Twixt nether and ether |
QUOTE(outlife11 @ Dec 2 2009, 12:12 PM) ic... is that mean i can take full control of 4 core ? You cant equate a processor's clockspeed like that. If you could, a OCed i7 920 at 4.0GHz will have an effective clockspeed of 16GHz on one core if use 2 core = 2.8Ghz/2 = roughly 1.4Ghz per core ? VBy the way, I posted an answer to your original question before; QUOTE(LokiD.d.G @ Nov 30 2009, 05:36 PM) Actually different Clarksfield processor Turbo Boost differently. The i7 720QM has a Turbo Boost ratio of 1/1/6/9 meaning that when all four cores are being utilized, it'll increase its multiplier by one, giving you a clockspeed of 1.73GHz. When three cores are being utilized you will get a similar result. When two are used, it will boost its multiplier by six, giving you a clockspeed of 2.4GHz. And when only a single core is needed (which is rare nowadays) you get a clockspeed of 2.8GHz. In other words, 133.33MHz x 21 = 2.8GHz. The i7 820QM has a Turbo ratio of 2/2/8/10 and the i7 920XM, 2/2/8/9. On paper this seems very promising, but due to feedback on their real world performance, one can assume that somehow the Turbo Boost function isn't working the way it should. |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
349 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: USJ/Subang Jaya |
OIC... i did read your post b4 just don understand !
when running single core izzit something like Pentium M 2.8Ghz with better FSB n cache ? i mean in performance / equal to ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,109 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Mike India Romeo India |
So does an Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 2.8GHz proc perform better than the Core i7-720QM 1.6GHz in GTA4?
|
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 09:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
1 core - 2.8GHz
2 cores - approx. 2.4GHz iirc... 4 cores - 1.6GHz for games, juz stick to C2Q or high clock C2D This post has been edited by astria: Dec 4 2009, 03:39 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 03:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
latest news is that Arrandale will be out in 3 January 2010...
the following models will make up of the first wave: Core i7-620M - 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-540M - 2.54GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-520M - 2.40GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-430M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache, Turbo Boost Core i3-350M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache Core i3-330MA - 2.13GHz, 3MB L3 cache |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 03:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE word, bro QUOTE(astria @ Dec 4 2009, 03:39 PM) latest news is that Arrandale will be out in 3 January 2010... wow that tempting the following models will make up of the first wave: Core i7-620M - 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-540M - 2.54GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-520M - 2.40GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-430M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache, Turbo Boost Core i3-350M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache Core i3-330MA - 2.13GHz, 3MB L3 cache but that is the socket used for them? different with Quad right, eventhough they have 4 physical cores like Quad. This post has been edited by Mr.Docter: Dec 4 2009, 03:51 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
all these are dual cores...
yes u read rit, even the Core i7 600M is a dual... but afaik, they can use PM55 chipset like the Core i7 quads, with the option of HM55 if the OEM wants to use GMA... This post has been edited by astria: Dec 4 2009, 03:59 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 04:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,109 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Mike India Romeo India |
QUOTE(astria @ Dec 4 2009, 03:39 PM) latest news is that Arrandale will be out in 3 January 2010... These sounds like the replacement of Core 2 Duo's the following models will make up of the first wave: Core i7-620M - 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-540M - 2.54GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-520M - 2.40GHz, 3MB L3 cache, HTT, Turbo Boost Core i5-430M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache, Turbo Boost Core i3-350M - 2.26GHz, 3MB L3 cache Core i3-330MA - 2.13GHz, 3MB L3 cache |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 04:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
they ARE the replacements of Core 2 Duo...
|
| Change to: | 0.0296sec
0.69
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 04:24 PM |