Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 13 14 15 16 17 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.

views
     
TSshinjun
post Sep 23 2009, 11:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(epet24 @ Sep 23 2009, 11:57 PM)
hi guy's...i planned to get D60 dis weekend..
but when i review the D3000 (just now)..
i noticed that there are a bit different between D60 & D3000..

but the price for D3000 is just vary about RM150 from D60 which i think that it is worth to get D3000 rather than D60 since it is more user friendly, wide LCD screen, and the important one is D3000 got their built in motor in the body...

so i need your advices here to help me to choose between D60 or D3000..which one is worth to have....
*
D3000 got no build-in motor as well, but with better spec such as more focus points and so on smile.gif
wcs2798
post Sep 24 2009, 12:04 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
673 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(lightning69 @ Sep 23 2009, 03:24 PM)
Hi...just wanna know what is the best price now for D5000 body only?
*
around rm2500
epet24
post Sep 24 2009, 12:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(shinjun @ Sep 23 2009, 11:59 PM)
D3000 got no build-in motor as well, but with better spec such as more focus points and so on smile.gif
*
hahaha...i tought that only D40 D40x & D60 got no build-in motor..

if so..that's mean D3000 user still need to look for AF-s lens la (for the future)...

which is more expensive rite...haha...

ayoyo....
noobie1
post Sep 24 2009, 12:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,538 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(epet24 @ Sep 23 2009, 11:57 PM)
hi guy's...i planned to get D60 dis weekend..
but when i review the D3000 (just now)..
i noticed that there are a bit different between D60 & D3000..

but the price for D3000 is just vary about RM150 from D60 which i think that it is worth to get D3000 rather than D60 since it is more user friendly, wide LCD screen, and the important one is D3000 got their built in motor in the body...

so i need your advices here to help me to choose between D60 or D3000..which one is worth to have....
*
oh come on..if d3000 got built in motor,then those d5000 and d90 can throw away dy...lolx..
for now, is better to get d3000 rather than get d60

General_Nic
post Sep 24 2009, 12:34 AM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


funny how a lot ppl seem to get info that DX000 series got build in AF motor hmm.gif
The Apprentice
post Sep 24 2009, 12:39 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
501 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


May cause by misleading sales person... certainly not by Nikon or forum.
andychan
post Sep 24 2009, 12:44 AM

ASTERLAVISTA BABY
*******
Senior Member
2,662 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Ipoh Mali ^^ KL Pergi



here is some pic from D3000 rclxms.gif

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
epet24
post Sep 24 2009, 12:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


guys..check this out

http://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Nikon-....shtml#compared
noobie1
post Sep 24 2009, 02:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,538 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(epet24 @ Sep 24 2009, 12:45 AM)
erm..u mean there got wrote D3000 come with AF motor??
jsc_tidus
post Sep 24 2009, 02:09 AM

Vader's Nephew
******
Senior Member
1,930 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: The Grid



QUOTE(epet24 @ Sep 24 2009, 12:45 AM)
D3000 and 1000D is very very similar in terms of physical-top-body design..
persona68
post Sep 24 2009, 02:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
106 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Teh Internetzz


notice the d3000 pics arent that sharp though
epet24
post Sep 24 2009, 02:18 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(noobie1 @ Sep 24 2009, 02:00 AM)
erm..u mean there got wrote D3000 come with AF motor??
*
no la bro...that site just show comparison between D60 D3000 and canon..

so from there u can know is it worth to have D3000 or not..

but that site also stated that D3000 do not have built in motor since they are compatible with AF-S and AF-I lens....
PinKiLicious
post Sep 24 2009, 03:24 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


would like to know what is the price for D3000 body + 18-105mm VR (D90 kit lens)
General_Nic
post Sep 24 2009, 03:32 AM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(PinKiLicious @ Sep 24 2009, 03:24 AM)
would like to know what is the price for D3000 body + 18-105mm VR (D90 kit lens)
*
D3000 body about RM1.7k,
18-105 around RM1.2k
so maybe u can get RM2.8-3k

project-o
post Sep 24 2009, 09:57 AM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Nikon, unlike Canon doesn't allow the buyer to choose a kit lens. If Nikon were to come up with such a kit like D3000+ 18-105VR or even the older 18-135 I feel it will be a best seller among the entry level kits.
noobie1
post Sep 24 2009, 11:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,538 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


come on..i think nikon said it was entry level because the body+lens will be cheap...so if thy make D3000 with 18105, the price would most likely ard 3k++...so most of the people would go for canon or sony as their entry are more cheap by that time...

lets say nikon entry level price at 3k
then sony and canon entry level price ard 2k or less

which would u choose if u r jz new to photography??
of course is 2k or less one,right? that the term for "entry level" =)
epet24
post Sep 24 2009, 04:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(PinKiLicious @ Sep 24 2009, 03:24 AM)
would like to know what is the price for D3000 body + 18-105mm VR (D90 kit lens)
*
i think if you wat to start use D3000 better start with 18-55mm VR

that just will cost u about rm2050 ~ rm2100


darthbaboon
post Sep 24 2009, 04:36 PM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(persona68 @ Sep 24 2009, 02:12 AM)
notice the d3000 pics arent that sharp though
*
Photo sharpness isn't a body thing rather a lens thing but mostly a photographer thing. So don't throw a fish into the slammer for a crime it didn't commit.
project-o
post Sep 24 2009, 06:50 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
If Nikon gives a choice of kit lens it would be good as in 2 packages D3000 + 18-55 or D3000+18-105. But the main reason I feel is that if they do so the 55-200VR lens will not be able to sell well.
QUOTE(noobie1 @ Sep 24 2009, 11:10 AM)
come on..i think nikon said it was entry level because the body+lens will be cheap...so if thy make D3000 with 18105, the price would most likely ard 3k++...so most of the people would go for canon or sony as their entry are more cheap by that time...

lets say nikon entry level price at 3k
then sony and canon entry level price ard 2k or less

which would u choose if u r jz new to photography??
of course is 2k or less one,right? that the term for "entry level" =)
*
The Apprentice
post Sep 25 2009, 12:14 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
501 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


The 18-105 & 55-200 range is very different... right?

126 Pages « < 13 14 15 16 17 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0245sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:21 AM