QUOTE(Wan @ Sep 11 2009, 11:37 AM)
Agree with Wenger a bit. You can make a case if the club is irresponsible. But if the clubs genuinely took care of them, whats the problem? It's just a case of what sort of compensation the old club should get.. they need to work on that, since if their best young players get to leave for free, whats the point in having academy and stuff.
united feeder clubs are paid quite well for the players they feed, help to transition from non-eu to eu player, and great loan deals for fledglings.
then of coz united and arsenal have a history of developing their own players.
there are clubs that only buy buy buy and sell sell....ruining careers of players, e.g. I thought Robinho and Saviola would be football gods but going to RM was the "best thing to do"
QUOTE(Wan @ Sep 11 2009, 01:17 PM)
As long as they do it the right way, there's nothing wrong with what they did. It's unfair to the 'feeder clubs' of course since they would lose the player(s) almost for nothing and they can do nothing about it, but that's up to the governing bodies to rectify. Make it so they can get compensation for the players they lose, or make it the young players between the age of xx-xx(xx-18 till they can sign a proper pro contract) under their books so that any other clubs wishing to get that player, have to go through the club. That way, it's up to the club whether to accept a bid or not.. they get money, the player(s) get a chance to further their career, and the buying club will have the player they wanted to develop further.. everyones happy.
As for Arsenal not having any English players.. look at them. They don't spend that much over the years. The stadium and their financial state, and even now they don't spend much on any players. Benitez should look at him before complaining he doesn't have money to spend, because Wenger hardly spend any, whether he has them or not is another matter. And English players cost A LOT. Even the young players cost a lot. And looking at the English players, only a select few are special. Rooney, Walcott.. who else? That's why he looks outside for his sources. It's not right, but he has to think whats right for his club. He looks for specific attributes in his players, and all his players are comfortable with the ball at their feet. The English players lack them.. and I would say, right now they have a few Englishmen starting to come out from their academy.
Again it goes back to the rules. In England they have this stupid rule of signing youth players only within 90mins of the club or something. They wanted to protect the small clubs, but in doing so, they somewhat stunted the development stage. The cream always rises to the top of course, but if you read about Scholes' story and the English mentality regarding how they play and develop players, you would know why that rule is stupid. If Scholes wasn't spotted by us, god knows what he might be doing right now.. still work at McD? who knows.
this is why we're UNITED
wenger can spot talent but SAF goes beyond that, can spot a short, small, asthmatic, hot headed ginger who can't tackle into a world class player
Sep 11 2009, 07:12 PM
He is a talent, no doubt about that but you can't always keep talent at bench or reserve him. He should on the starting 11, really hope can he shine and improve our wing play.
Quote
0.0303sec
0.45
6 queries
GZIP Disabled