QUOTE(Wan @ Sep 2 2009, 01:02 AM)
You didn't like the 3-1 win? or the other games where we look very good against them in that particular formation? It was just a bad night with players off form.. Giggsy particularly who was our main creative force in that game. He messed up big time. Our only other option for his role that night was Anderson, who's not in great form himself. Last option is of course to go with 442 early if we're desperate. We might be more threatening, but we would leave ourselves open at the back and easy for them to dominate us in the middle with their extra men there.
As for more people scoring them, Nani is pretty good at cutting in inside. That's one of his trait although he's no Ronaldo of course. And Park as good as he is cutting inside, is crap in front of goal. Didn't score that many. Like I said, on another night, it could have turned out into a great night for us. Giggsy had a lot of chances to put our players through, or make great plays, but almost every single time, it didn't came off for him in the first half especially. We may have been lucky, but with the chances we had at the end, Arsenal were lucky as well it didn't turn into a bigger scoreline. It's a fine line between success and failure, and that night we got the better of the deal. That's just the way it is. Nobody is really happy of course not winning comfortably, but big games are usually tight affairs.
Being early on in the season also didn't help matters. And having to change tactics since the departure of Ronaldo and having a new RW in the side, meant that we won't be hitting it off consistently.
I'm still surprised people still have this idea that 442 will just work every single game. We struggled there with Keane and Scholes after 99, and they are the best combo's around that time. We know how much of a monster Keane was, yet we didn't really hit the heights of 99 till last few years where the 433/451 have served us really well in the big games, with 442 for the normal/smaller games although sometimes used in the big games as well. We don't have a Keano now. No team plays with a straight 442 anymore for all type of games. Either they play with extra men/man in the middle or switch between that and some other formation for normal games.
yeah i dont like the 3-1 win and when united play good
as i said before i dont like the formation.. and also the line up for the 2-1 win.
but i do support SAF for the tactic coz who know how the game gonna be or whether the tactic will work or not on the first place.. what dissapoint me will be the decision to stick with it on the 2nd half when clearly it doesnt work. for me giggs aint that bad that night. carrick was the worst one.. wonder if he even got to the pitch. valencia also pretty bad, running here and there for nothing but do got lots of determination.was hoping for scholes/park/ando to come early on 2nd half with owen/berba earlier.
yes it could be bigger win.. but that happen coz arsenal started to open and pressing more forward desperate for a goal. was hoping for good performance rather than comfortably win or big wins. it surprised me more that some people still hv the idea of some people hv the idea 4-4-2 will work every single game
only said i prefer we play 4-4-2 against arsenal with more player as goalscorer threat on the pitch
This post has been edited by onepack: Sep 2 2009, 12:20 PM