Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
TEACH ME HOW TO OC Q6600, 3.0 to 3.2!!! HELP ME..UNSUCCESSFULL!!!
|
uzer85
|
 Aug 16 2009, 04:23 AM
|
|
QUOTE(zoslan @ Aug 16 2009, 03:49 AM) Thank you bro..im glad..eventho its the first time and its not the best..but at least im glad n happy...later on learn more and more. 
Added on August 16, 2009, 3:50 amwow bro. i wanted too try one other day..but wat cooler fits to that OC? im using the cheap one only..CM TX-3..  and yes..i am into gaming too..heheh..but my rig low end one..GC also old one(3850 512mb) if u got good budget, rm3++ something, get Megahalem/TRUE/IFX-14. if not, Sunbeam CCF is superb option! can get around rm150.  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 16 2009, 09:15 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(uzer85 @ Aug 16 2009, 04:23 AM) if u got good budget, rm3++ something, get Megahalem/TRUE/IFX-14. if not, Sunbeam CCF is superb option! can get around rm150. wow..thankx for the guide bro.. the sunbeam nice price..hehehe... |
|
|
|
|
|
*-a|i3n-*
|
Aug 16 2009, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
here's my oc result...not really good in oc-ing...but still can pass la ...xD.... maybe ts can try like mine aswell....because i'm on my pc 24 hour for dl-in...so i perfer low temp oc result... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 16 2009, 11:00 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(*-a|i3n-* @ Aug 16 2009, 10:19 AM) here's my oc result...not really good in oc-ing...but still can pass la ...xD.... maybe ts can try like mine aswell....because i'm on my pc 24 hour for dl-in...so i perfer low temp oc result... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « nice...good for me... and yes..i also usually will let my pc run 1-2 days...so better change something to make it stable rite..heheh...running 3.2 one day..but donno yet..hehehhehe |
|
|
|
|
|
hilmiangah
|
Aug 16 2009, 11:44 AM
|
Kongsi Gelap Elite Ramadass
|
QUOTE(*-a|i3n-* @ Aug 16 2009, 10:19 AM) here's my oc result...not really good in oc-ing...but still can pass la ...xD.... maybe ts can try like mine aswell....because i'm on my pc 24 hour for dl-in...so i perfer low temp oc result... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « u can save more electricity/money buy running it on stock setting on those long torrent/downloading session. well at least thats what i do. |
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 16 2009, 07:30 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Aug 16 2009, 11:44 AM) u can save more electricity/money buy running it on stock setting on those long torrent/downloading session. well at least thats what i do. bro.so u recommend like our fren above izit |
|
|
|
|
|
GeneralX
|
Aug 16 2009, 09:57 PM
|
|
|
He's correct. Try running 400x8 instead of 333x9. You might not need 1.40v to reach 400x8. Less vCore = save more power
|
|
|
|
|
|
hilmiangah
|
Aug 16 2009, 10:34 PM
|
Kongsi Gelap Elite Ramadass
|
QUOTE(GeneralX @ Aug 16 2009, 09:57 PM) He's correct. Try running 400x8 instead of 333x9. You might not need 1.40v to reach 400x8. Less vCore = save more power but that will disable the EIST and in the long run consume more power. |
|
|
|
|
|
GeneralX
|
Aug 16 2009, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Aug 16 2009, 10:34 PM) but that will disable the EIST and in the long run consume more power. In terms of power efficiency in overclocking, I mean. Of course nothing beats stock/undervoltaging  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:00 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Aug 16 2009, 10:34 PM) but that will disable the EIST and in the long run consume more power. Hmm  but before that...do i need a gud cooler then the one im using now CM TX-3 (the cheap one) or juz can use existing cooler
Added on August 17, 2009, 1:00 amQUOTE(hilmiangah @ Aug 16 2009, 10:34 PM) but that will disable the EIST and in the long run consume more power. dammit..i still dint get the EIST..ahahahha..so noob now This post has been edited by zoslan: Aug 17 2009, 01:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
tech3910
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:02 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(GeneralX @ Aug 16 2009, 10:44 PM) In terms of power efficiency in overclocking, I mean. Of course nothing beats stock/undervoltaging u said it....  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:11 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Aug 17 2009, 01:02 AM) u said it.... niceeee oneee wow 
Added on August 17, 2009, 1:12 amQUOTE(GeneralX @ Aug 16 2009, 09:57 PM) He's correct. Try running 400x8 instead of 333x9. You might not need 1.40v to reach 400x8. Less vCore = save more power in this matter of case... so after running 400x8 ...what vcore that suit for that speed help me..thankx This post has been edited by zoslan: Aug 17 2009, 01:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
hilmiangah
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:16 AM
|
Kongsi Gelap Elite Ramadass
|
QUOTE(zoslan @ Aug 17 2009, 01:11 AM) niceeee oneee wow
Added on August 17, 2009, 1:12 amin this matter of case... so after running 400x8 ...what vcore that suit for that speed help me..thankxthats why u stress it after oc. if it wasnt stable thats when u add/adjust some voltage. |
|
|
|
|
|
GeneralX
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:19 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Aug 17 2009, 01:02 AM) Fine, missed that tiny detail  QUOTE(zoslan @ Aug 17 2009, 01:12 AM) in this matter of case... so after running 400x8 ...what vcore that suit for that speed help me..thankx Try 1.2V up to 1.35V. If it is stable below 1.3V, that would be good |
|
|
|
|
|
uzer85
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:57 AM
|
|
|
higher fsb would put more stress on the mobo while higher multiplier put more stress on the proc.
(correct me if i'm wrong, i'm still learning though)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSzoslan
|
Aug 17 2009, 02:15 AM
|
Getting Started
|
hi, its me again my dearest fren in LYN.. success at 3.0ghz at stock vcore..and stress it and stable.. now i want to push at 3.2ghz..but not successfull..i dont know why..anyone can help me??  at 3.0 im doin it at 9x333 tryin at 8x400 ...not successfull..  This post has been edited by zoslan: Sep 7 2009, 04:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0193sec
0.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled