He's correct. Try running 400x8 instead of 333x9. You might not need 1.40v to reach 400x8. Less vCore = save more power
TEACH ME HOW TO OC Q6600, 3.0 to 3.2!!! HELP ME..UNSUCCESSFULL!!!
|
|
 Aug 16 2009, 09:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random  
|
|
Quote|
|
Aug 16 2009, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random
|
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Aug 16 2009, 10:34 PM) but that will disable the EIST and in the long run consume more power. In terms of power efficiency in overclocking, I mean. Of course nothing beats stock/undervoltaging   |
|
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Aug 17 2009, 01:02 AM) u said it.... Fine, missed that tiny detail  QUOTE(zoslan @ Aug 17 2009, 01:12 AM) in this matter of case... Try 1.2V up to 1.35V. If it is stable below 1.3V, that would be good so after running 400x8 ...what vcore that suit for that speed  help me..thankx |
| Change to: |  0.0183sec
 0.57
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 08:19 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.