I'm not really into car technical; just know enough to (hopefully) not get conned.
I dont floor the pedal; just alot of stop-go-stop-go... which is the main cause of the high fuel consumption. On highway, a full tank (34L) can get me to Ipoh (over 200KM) and still over 50% of fuel remain in the tank
QUOTE(daijoubu @ Feb 5 2010, 02:06 PM)
Yup =D former edifier showroom fella. No wonder ur nick sounds familiar =D. How are you man? Things been good?
Thanks for your long reply bro
. AFAIK the CPS have improvement in both intake and camshaft, while IAFM only have improvement on intake. They dont come together. The CPS is the better one, and from what i read, most reviewers say that in the engine with IAFM, torque dip is still noticable, but definately less, while on CPS, its almost eliminated.
But fuel consumption wise, what is the FC if on 80% highway and 20% city? =D that is more of my driving style. for 100% city its quite expensive tho 0.o. u must be really flooring it! =D
Thanks for your long reply bro
But fuel consumption wise, what is the FC if on 80% highway and 20% city? =D that is more of my driving style. for 100% city its quite expensive tho 0.o. u must be really flooring it! =D
Feb 5 2010, 02:46 PM

Quote
0.0492sec
0.25
7 queries
GZIP Disabled