Why so fast release sequel? The MP player base havent even stable yet,as the game is not even 1 year old.

This is ridiculous and i hope they dont keep releasing sequels.Its not like L4D has no more potential to expand while the the game feels so empty,even till now.

I'll go FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU if TF3 sequel is announced.

I dont see the reason why they cant just merge the game.

CoH did that,with OF and ToV.Still the same old exe,but you might have different campaigns.

Screw XBox.Causing whole lot of trouble.

No.

They want to milk me with little content.No.

Even EP1 i also dont bother.

Yes,MW2.

Time to go back to FPS.

MW2 is gonna rape L4D2 like no tomorrow.

Somehow,feels like this year,there is a lot of 2s.MW2,SC2,Operation Flashpoint 2,L4D2.

Game developers run ou of ideas for new IP?

Still got,Bad Company 2,DiRT2,Sup Com 2,DoW2(released).

2009 is the year of 2s.

ME2?

Whats that?

Oh,that one.

What happen to the old people?

All dead?

Yeap,it should be a free DLC in the first place.

Damn,i miss them.

I finished the whole game in CC.

Ellis looks like scout.Does he sound like one?

All these stuff could have been in a DLC.

And can Double Jump.

Uses Force-of-Nature to push Tank back.

This is a joke or what?

What happen to Valve's high standards?

Whatever Valve is doing with L4D2,it's all against their own philosophy,quality,support and promise.TF2 took 6-7 years to make so that we get that fun game we have today.HL2 EP3 still have little or no sign of it,as Valve wants to have a good ending to HL2.Same for Portal 2.Even CS 1.4 still getting support now.

If they are so money minded and not concern at all on quality,they would have HL3,TF3,Portal 2,CS:S 2 etc all out by now.

Why cant L4D2 be like those games?

Im not surprised at all if the players are pissed with it.The community should be angry about it.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Jun 3 2009, 09:01 AM

I dont see why those content couldnt be a DLC that will be released in a or 2 year's time? L4D1 have so little content and it's a standalone game.People payed a full priced game for it.Unlike TF2 where it comes with Orange Box that offer a solid single player experience.

Burnout Paradise didnt have any weather effects when it first release to the consoles.Full day and night cycle,plus,weather effects were added in a DLC after a few months.Bikes were also added to the game in another free DLC.

The Director does seem to have heaps of new feature,but releasing a sequel now is not a good idea at all.Considering it's a multiplayer game,as the new sequel will have a big impact on the community and fracture the current community.Besides,the sequel contradicts with Valve's promise to support the game for long term.Where are the L4D1 DLC? There are only 1.

It could be a worthy sequel if they actually put more time in it by delaying it for another 1-2 years,as more features are added as time goes by to the sequel and more time to polish it.There is nothing to do with the Valvetime or Blizzard's "When It's Done" ™.It's just that,from past experience,if a devs rush out a sequel too fast,the sequel is gonna be shit.Whether it's full of bugs,or not enough new features.Games are getting more and more complicated these days,while the expectations from gamers are getting higher,i really dont see why L4D2 shouldnt be delayed as time is needed to make a worthy sequel.I rather see the new Director and heaps of new features in L4D2 than what is in the current one.The current L4d2 sound like a half assed sequel to me.

This is no different than CoD is releasing every year.Thank gawd,Infinity Ward renamed the sequel of CoD4.

I didnt complain when SC2 or D3 took about 10 years to release. Good games take time to make.Crap games come out every year.L4D is a good game.If they keep the community busy with a few DLC,while develop L4D2 for a longer period.It would be a win win situation for the community and Valve.

The Scout looking guy,really sound like a TF2 Scout.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09-left-4-dead/50351

Maybe the 20 weapons includes his Baseball Bat and Ball too.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Jun 3 2009, 11:33 PM

That doesnt seem like a good idea.

I lol-ed too.

Seems like a lot of people are unhappy with it.

---

Added on June 4, 2009, 10:42 amYeah,it still depends on how is the implementation.

What i see now,not a good idea.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Jun 4 2009, 10:42 AM

We'll see how it goes.

The more i read,the more i think some of the new tech just cant be a DLC.Especially the Director 2.0 part.

They still need more content though.

I think L4D2 is more like a franchise reboot in a sequel form.

If it's done like UT2003 and UT2004,i dont mind as UT2004 is a huge improvement over UT2003.

On the other hand,if it's like NFS,fcuk you Valve.