wat camera model?? D3X?
1.06Gb for 1 RAW pic or wat??

LOL, Nokia or Nikon?

wanna ask, is it safe to keep DSLR n lenses in aircon room?
leave on table in aircon room, not in box or bag

swt...
autofocus motor is needed turn the focusing mechanism
the motor could be in the cam's body in some models
or the motor is in the lens for non built in motor cams

for example, D40/40X/60/5000 dun have built in motor
u nid to buy AF-S lenses with motor only u can auto focus
D90 n above models have built in motor,
so any lenses can autofocus on them, with or without motor in lens

which model u wan to know?

where u went?
really so long din c u on d

maybe without the swivel screen?

not only smaller body than D5000
but the on/off switch at the shutter release button is black plastic

agree wif statement
indoor shots really nid external flash
dun think d, terus get SB900 then eat maggi for few months

is 85mm count as prime lense oso?

so u're trying to say IQ is better on 35?

but if compare wif 50mm f1.4, 50 is better rite?

Guys, i nid suggestions here
shud i save up to buy 18-200 now, then save to buy 50 f1.4 or 50 f1.8 much much later?(very long cos mahal)
OR save to buy 18-200, then buy 35 f1.8 much earlier as dun nid save so much?
OR buy 35 f1.8 1st then only save for 18-200?

i really like to do portraits n bokeh shots now, so interested to get prime lenses,
but i dun have zoom lens, which will giv me problems if i travel
so not sure get all in 1 zoom lens 1st so can do all purpose shot
or sacrifice zoom shots to get great portraits n bokeh shots?

if ask which lens i really wan, i wan prime lens >.<
but 2 things make me hesitate:
1)if i go on travel, prime lens would b practically not usefull for me
2)u think will it be a waste for a beginner like to get a prime lens?

thx for all the advice n suggestion!

final few advice for me to make decision
is 35 worth buying?
how much d price now?
if price affordable,
then i decide to buy 18-200 1st, then can buy 35 not long after that

actually im facing 2 limitations now wif my kit lens, which oso cause the headache im having now
1)kit lens aperture not high enaf for bokeh shots
2)most significant, zoom not enaf! really hate cant zoom in on subjects when i went HK recently >.<

i decided to get 18-200 1st then save to get 35
thx for all advise given!

nxt question is,
which model?
if can get Nikon 18-200VRii it would be best, but expensiv...
i dun wan Tamron cos slow AF...
is Sigma 18-200 OS HSM good?

n how do 3rd party brand prime lenses fare?

---

Added on July 3, 2009, 9:29 pmthe lambency diffuser is designed for use when there is no ceiling to bounce flash
n i tot using this diffuser normally point 90degree up?

This post has been edited by General_Nic: Jul 3 2009, 09:29 PM

i agree Sigma is quite good,
since Kimura u told me b4

but is it worth spending 1k less to get Sigma instead of Nikon?

---

Added on July 3, 2009, 11:32 pmcomparing di466 wif SB600??
totally different class la

ppl compare di622 wif SB600

This post has been edited by General_Nic: Jul 3 2009, 11:32 PM

yours is the clear Lambency?
got new cloud version now,
u think is useful?

do u use clear version oso?
got any difference between them at all?
cos i jz bought the clear 1, dunno nid to buy the cloud 1 or not

wat is UWA?