QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Mar 24 2009, 09:16 AM)
PCWork, there's a mistake though,
There's nothing new in Audio, everything is copied here and there. The only difference is what you chose to implement and how you wish to present your art akin to an artist. Let's take RSA's SR71A for an example, it's really just a straight out Mint without the Multiloop, Xin's Reference is a two channel AD8616 with a buffered ground using AD8531.(READ: cmoy with beefed up opamp and ground) All these are signs on how audio technology is really just this much, being exploited to death.
A rough explanation on the topology used helps users to have a quick understanding on the performance and the sound quality they will perceive. It'll help your promotion in fact

EDIT: Might as well be clear on my stand. Revealing the topology is not going to sell your circuit away for free. Only the value of the components (choice of opamp, resistors, capacitors) will possibly affect you (
though I highly doubt anyone would want to copy it as there would be too many downsides to it). To show empathy,I'm also working on something similar for commercialization and
I can really understand your eagerness to protect your product.hold your horse dude. how do you know there's a mistake? or you are the one who judge which is the mistake?
since if you said it is copied here and there. then why borther of interested of requesting the picture of it? to learn how to implement it?
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Feb 26 2009, 11:48 AM)
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Feb 26 2009, 01:22 PM)
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Feb 26 2009, 10:59 PM)
I'm pretty curious about the outcome. Who are the engineers behind this amplifier?
Any underside pictars to further understand the topologies involved?
At first glance the battery seems to output 3.6V at 300mAH, I'm thinking of non inverting single opamp stages from Analog devices?

i learn the fact that if some one disclosed their amp internal parts, expecially commercial amps, or after market amp. they often get ambushed by saying "after market amp is so often overpriced... and i had recall some guys in here even said "RSA tomahawk is just a Cmoy.. i can make it below RM 100, they are seriuosly overprice."
well for this case. i will like to stress that this specific secret amp is NOT copy from any sources over internet, nor the standard shematics for an amp.
and pls get your words nicely if you don't want to start a flame war.. you often post like you are being the mighty and saying other ppls were bad.. downsides,, and so on by the fact you never even have a listen at the amp. since you are now working on the commercial version of the amp, how about now ppl said your amp " the amp you design is copy from internet standard schematic with some minor tweak. it's full of compromise, and it is just another similar amp with different maker and brand name. as same as thousands of DIY brand over the internet.. so why bother to spend time on it? the time you spend on your amp on tweak it can't make your amp fly to the heaven.. or make it a serious big monster that can drive headphone or even speaker? it still stick to the nature of the op amp you used as we must remember the science, that anythings hard work you do won't break the rules of the nature science and you can't break the limits of the op amp itself. there's always much better shematic & parts over internet. just depend you know how to use it or not!" feeling nice?
and i also had learn that there's too much people who is really great in critics. critics is the easiest way to speak of. just say it..as if you are way beyond them.
and can't you read it properlly? i said i am involve in ttesting the amp. hence i respect the afford spend by walabies and yuheng. pls do NOT even mention that it is "my product"
how about when your commercilized amp comes out. pls do includes the complete and detail schematic on them? and some one else comes out and say. hell this amp only cost half of the actual price.. this op amp only cost RM 20... this caps make it lum sum only RM 50.. so total not even RM 100... you want that? if you really did it that way. then go ahead. it's a great community service.
if you don't want to do that. pls do not even disturb or interested in the naked picture. go ahead and do your amp which is better sounding. and produce it commercialized as a fair comparison.
how about go to KFC and tell them. cooking chicken is copy here and there. we involve oil. some powder and spices.. just depend on how we implement it. now KFC must tell us what they use within the fried chicken so that we as a consumer know what we eaten into our tummy. and it actually helps to promotes KFC even better.if it is so easy. then everyone can be the best cook. those recipies are no secret, infact they are tonnes of them over the www.
this is similar case to the secret amp. the parts itself is no secret. but the way to implement it is indeed a trade secret.
QUOTE(scottiebabie @ Mar 24 2009, 09:31 AM)
true dat...well said EFN! indeed most (if not all) amp casings can be dismantled anyways. its really no biggie for if its ground breaking technology, then have it patented. if one commercialize it, there will be ppl opening it up for more than a simple visual looksee. no one really cares much cos there's just too much stuff out there - besides cloning takes alot of resources too & its much easier to use & mod designs available in public domain. infact i think 'cept for IC circuitry, all amplifier designs are public domain but do korek me if im wrong.
it would be nice to know the basic tech & specs sooo those tat havnt heard can do a paper comparo. eg are the internal opamp/s interchangeable? or is it full discrete transistors? mw output rating? type of battery & replacement? physical size (pics wit ipod beside would be nice)? etc etc - i sincerely hope customer support will be excellent (for once) & it wont be another boleh deal of Just Listen Do As I Say Not As I Do & fergadsake Dont Ask Questions (geee sounds like some wacko wannabee PM of a banana
monachyrepublic & his biggg maamaaa

)
u know i oftened wonder about de asian mentality of shhhssssh shhhhssssh - don tell ya - big secret la - i only give to my son - typa thinking. i know its da 5000 year old culture talking but times have changed...fortunetly. esp if we commercialize stuff. speaking of which i bliv da chinese are da worlds worst offenders when it comes to cloning
sooo bottomline, ppl pls put out some specs & data on this. and be prepared to answer tough questions cos its out hard earned dineros we're spending sooo as smart & informed consumers tat we are (

) we should could & would ask questions.
put it out there & let da market do its thang. if its good, build it & they will come

bro. not that i am being the one who bring out the flame. just you have to understand the "detail" i mean here is not the fact that they are asking for type of battery.. physical size and so on.. i feel that the spec itself can't even indicates the sound quality of it produced. hence i am offering ppl who interested to come over and listen. else. wait for the first batch user review for it's performance.
and design the amp really don't even relying on any single shit of paper nor spec sheet of the chips. everythings were design freely with suggestino and advice from a more than 2 high end technicions who repairs high end hifi gear.
here i will like to answer some question. internal bettery were running as indicated in picture. GP rechargeable battery 3.6V 300 mah. can be bought at most of the store. and there's a plug on top of the board. meaning user can indeed change their battery them self. the battery is meantly for wireless indoor phone.the chip, the battery option will have an upgrade version which uses a larger battery which will make the amp last for about 280 hours per single charge on driving normal headphone.. i not sure is that an op amp. is NOT interchangeable. mW output is not sure. but it is capable of driving 600ohm headphone with a relatively nice control despite the size. driving usual Hd650 and HD580 is not a big problem as the secret amp is initially designed for my HD580.
This post has been edited by PcWork: Mar 24 2009, 02:40 PM