QUOTE(tanjq87 @ Mar 9 2009, 12:53 AM)
ooic... then how about beercan without the maxxum word? I just bought a beercan without the maxxum word today.
i compared side by side kitlens at 70mm f5.6, beercan at 70mm f4 and 16105 at 70mm f5.6, the order of sharpness is 16105>kitlens>beercan, is it normal for beercan less sharp than kitlens? but by very little, almost cannot differentiate those type, but the 16105 is much sharper than the other two.
shouldnt u put all at f5.6..??then u have a better comparison...try at f8 for comparison....i compared side by side kitlens at 70mm f5.6, beercan at 70mm f4 and 16105 at 70mm f5.6, the order of sharpness is 16105>kitlens>beercan, is it normal for beercan less sharp than kitlens? but by very little, almost cannot differentiate those type, but the 16105 is much sharper than the other two.
Mar 9 2009, 02:23 AM

Quote
0.0262sec
0.43
6 queries
GZIP Disabled