Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Sony Alpha Thread V22!, The Orange Legion

views
     
jimlim007
post Mar 8 2009, 10:46 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(Zen-X @ Mar 8 2009, 10:40 PM)
err...
guys...
what's liveview function actually?
*
old DSLR cant seeing lcd screen and snap photo. normally digital camera can do that la.

but now most new model of DSLR can work in screen to snap photo. but remember, there are few type of autofocus in live view, sony and canon also different
chiggy
post Mar 8 2009, 10:50 PM

Sleepy
*******
Senior Member
2,745 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kelana Jaya


with liveview, you can also

1. use the flip lcd to raise your hand high to shoot when got obstacle or people blocking you
2. use the flip lcd to maintain eye level when shooting portraits, or kids
3. also can use for macro when the small small screen hard to see
4. easier to set white balance, can just preview on the liveview

and err... many more which I duwan to think right now tongue.gif
jimlim007
post Mar 8 2009, 10:52 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


live view use more battery power tongue.gif
tanjq87
post Mar 8 2009, 11:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


what's the difference between beercan and beercan cross x version?

achew
post Mar 8 2009, 11:12 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


those buddies here with flash...

how am i suppose to fire my external flash wirelessly without firing the built-in one???
sidewinderz
post Mar 8 2009, 11:17 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(achew @ Mar 8 2009, 11:12 PM)
those buddies here with flash...

how am i suppose to fire my external flash wirelessly without firing the built-in one???
*
if i remember correctly, you can't... sad.gif
Seng_Kiat
post Mar 8 2009, 11:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
bump

user posted image
Zeegon
post Mar 8 2009, 11:29 PM

Trololol ;)
******
Senior Member
1,059 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Subang Jaya (USJ)



QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Mar 8 2009, 11:17 PM)
if i remember correctly, you can't... sad.gif
*
I think can rite?
But need an external transmitter and receiver. Go shashinki...i think they got sell..
achew
post Mar 8 2009, 11:30 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Mar 8 2009, 11:17 PM)
if i remember correctly, you can't... sad.gif
*
har??den doesnt it sound a bit stupid??lets say i wanna create some kind of lighting effect where i only wan my light source to come from 1 direction....so it cant b done?
chiggy
post Mar 8 2009, 11:39 PM

Sleepy
*******
Senior Member
2,745 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kelana Jaya


QUOTE(achew @ Mar 8 2009, 11:30 PM)
har??den doesnt it sound a bit stupid??lets say i wanna create some kind of lighting effect where i only wan my light source to come from 1 direction....so it cant b done?
*
try reducing the internal flash exposure... maybe at -2
i've read somewhere you can use an old film and cover the internal flash...
albnok
post Mar 8 2009, 11:46 PM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


achew, there are many ways to reduce the effect of the on-body flash signal.

1) use a shutter speed that is faster than the flash sync speed of your body, thus triggering HSS (1/200s would be sure for the A200/A300/A350)
2) use a piece of overexposed, developed film negative over your pop-up flash
3) use a darker aperture e.g. F11
4) use a lower ISO e.g. ISO100

The moment you enter HSS mode, the signal is totally not captured by the camera. Of course, the downside is the fast shutter speed, which will reduce ambient light... but you can do 1/200s F1.4 ISO1600 to bring up the ambient light.

On the other hand, you can make daylight appear to be night, using 1/800s F11 ISO100...

If you can find a strip of exposed negative (usually the black end of a film) you won't need to do any of the steps above.
tanjq87
post Mar 8 2009, 11:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


albnok, i think u can answer my question tongue.gif
tell me more about beercan version?
minolta, minolta maxxum, minolta ma"XX"um?
which is the earliest and best copy?
chiggy
post Mar 8 2009, 11:52 PM

Sleepy
*******
Senior Member
2,745 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kelana Jaya


QUOTE(tanjq87 @ Mar 8 2009, 11:48 PM)
albnok, i think u can answer my question tongue.gif
tell me more about beercan version?
minolta, minolta maxxum, minolta ma"XX"um?
which is the earliest and best copy?
*
as i'm aware of, there is only ONE beercan version that is Minolta 70-210mm F4
no other lens is called beercan

EXCEPT... big beercan and small beercan tongue.gif
Seng_Kiat
post Mar 8 2009, 11:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
what is the different between F42 and F58 (other than its head can move)? btw, I am talking about flash. biggrin.gif
noprob
post Mar 9 2009, 12:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Mar 8 2009, 11:54 PM)
what is the different between F42 and F58 (other than its head can move)? btw, I am talking about flash. biggrin.gif
*
bro , maybe this can help ... http://www.alphastrobist.com/
tanjq87
post Mar 9 2009, 12:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(chiggy @ Mar 8 2009, 11:52 PM)
as i'm aware of, there is only ONE beercan version that is Minolta 70-210mm F4
no other lens is called beercan

EXCEPT... big beercan and small beercan tongue.gif
*
but how come some are with maxxum word in front of the lens?
dpreview forum

albnok
post Mar 9 2009, 12:42 AM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


tanjq87: The crossed XX version is the first version to come out, which is supposedly sharper. ExxonMobil sued Minolta for using the crossed XX so newer versions came with the XX separated.

Crossed XX is rarer and commands a collector value.

The crossed XX version of the 50mm F1.7 is prone to sticky aperture blades; don't know about other lenses though.
achew
post Mar 9 2009, 12:48 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 8 2009, 11:46 PM)
achew, there are many ways to reduce the effect of the on-body flash signal.

1) use a shutter speed that is faster than the flash sync speed of your body, thus triggering HSS (1/200s would be sure for the A200/A300/A350)
2) use a piece of overexposed, developed film negative over your pop-up flash
3) use a darker aperture e.g. F11
4) use a lower ISO e.g. ISO100

The moment you enter HSS mode, the signal is totally not captured by the camera. Of course, the downside is the fast shutter speed, which will reduce ambient light... but you can do 1/200s F1.4 ISO1600 to bring up the ambient light.

On the other hand, you can make daylight appear to be night, using 1/800s F11 ISO100...

If you can find a strip of exposed negative (usually the black end of a film) you won't need to do any of the steps above.
*
yo boss..thanks for the tips ya.....seems like its slightly more troublesome than i thought..haha....previously i thought this could b easily done with some setting on the camera/flash..lol..btw..does other brand's flash also need to do the same thing???


i think no1 is probably more suitable for me..lol..since i wanna try to shoot at dark enviroment..and jsut wanted my flash to send light from a certain direction =)
tanjq87
post Mar 9 2009, 12:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 9 2009, 12:42 AM)
tanjq87: The crossed XX version is the first version to come out, which is supposedly sharper. ExxonMobil sued Minolta for using the crossed XX so newer versions came with the XX separated.

Crossed XX is rarer and commands a collector value.

The crossed XX version of the 50mm F1.7 is prone to sticky aperture blades; don't know about other lenses though.
*
ooic... then how about beercan without the maxxum word? I just bought a beercan without the maxxum word today.
i compared side by side kitlens at 70mm f5.6, beercan at 70mm f4 and 16105 at 70mm f5.6, the order of sharpness is 16105>kitlens>beercan, is it normal for beercan less sharp than kitlens? but by very little, almost cannot differentiate those type, but the 16105 is much sharper than the other two.


albnok
post Mar 9 2009, 01:17 AM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


achew, all Canons require that you have a 580EX I/II or a ST-E2 transmitter on the camera, to trigger an off-camera flash.

I'm not sure about Nikon and how easy it is to remove the popup flash from showing, but the D40/D40x/D50/D60 do not have wireless commander capability.

tanjq87, the beercan should be pretty sharp. I've felt it to be sharper than the kit lens but never did any formal tests. If your 16-105mm is indeed sharper, then it might hint that it is, indeed, based on the Zeiss 16-80mm design...

126 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0251sec    0.51    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 10:18 AM