Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
131 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 NVIDIA GRAPHIC CARD FANS CLUB V2, Discussion All about Nvidia Graphic Card

views
     
kahjye
post Mar 2 2009, 06:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,494 posts

Joined: Feb 2009

but i dunno how to OC it... lOL..sked burnt
Laric
post Mar 2 2009, 06:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
can anybody help me with my problem please?
i wan to run photoshop CS4 extended but my GPU dunno why cannot use it...
when i load it says the monitor profile "LG W1942T" appears to be defective. Please rerun monitor calibration software.

then inside it says no GPU detected... ask me to update my driver...
using a GeForce 9500GT... latest drivers from nvidia already...

metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 06:19 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(ZeneticX @ Mar 2 2009, 06:08 PM)
btw speaking bout voltage control software,any nice 1 to recommend out thr?i know there's 1 by evga but does it work for outside cards (diff manufacturer)?
*
there's a cracked version. I tried it and it works. here is the LINK (but this is v1.0, there is still no crack for the latest verison)
kahjye
post Mar 2 2009, 06:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,494 posts

Joined: Feb 2009

QUOTE(Laric @ Mar 2 2009, 06:17 PM)
can anybody help me with my problem please?
i wan to run photoshop CS4 extended but my GPU dunno why cannot use it...
when i load it says the monitor profile "LG W1942T" appears to be defective. Please rerun monitor calibration software.

then inside it says no GPU detected... ask me to update my driver...
using a GeForce 9500GT... latest drivers from nvidia already...
*
wrong section biggrin.gif
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 06:23 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(Laric @ Mar 2 2009, 06:17 PM)
can anybody help me with my problem please?
i wan to run photoshop CS4 extended but my GPU dunno why cannot use it...
when i load it says the monitor profile "LG W1942T" appears to be defective. Please rerun monitor calibration software.

then inside it says no GPU detected... ask me to update my driver...
using a GeForce 9500GT... latest drivers from nvidia already...
*
U better use some registry cleaner program first before installing the new nvidia driver. try google "Driver Sweeper". and reintall your nvidia driver. see if it can detect your graphic card
Laric
post Mar 2 2009, 06:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(kahjye @ Mar 2 2009, 06:20 PM)
wrong section biggrin.gif
*
oops sorry... just didn't know where to ask these questions...
ZeneticX
post Mar 2 2009, 06:31 PM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



QUOTE(metsatsu @ Mar 2 2009, 06:19 PM)
there's a cracked version. I tried it and it works. here is the LINK (but this is v1.0, there is still no crack for the latest verison)
*
download and installed it.but it says "this device is not recognized" sweat.gif
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 06:35 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


did u patch the exe file first?

u must click the "VoltageTune.Patch.v1.0" file first. when the menu pops up, it will want u to search for the EVGAVoltageTuner.exe in the EVGA program files folder.

This post has been edited by metsatsu: Mar 2 2009, 06:37 PM
ZeneticX
post Mar 2 2009, 06:39 PM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



theres no such file in the zip.....can u send me or provide another link?
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 06:40 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


oh really? maybe they have removed it... gimme your email, i will email it to u.
ckh93
post Mar 2 2009, 06:53 PM

40k VIP club
******
Senior Member
1,136 posts

Joined: Jan 2009

wah u guys all GTX GTX me still using 8th series..zzz
mayat^reput
post Mar 2 2009, 06:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
297 posts

Joined: May 2006



ahaha...i still with my 8800GT OC...
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 06:59 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(ckh93 @ Mar 2 2009, 06:53 PM)
wah u guys all GTX GTX me still using 8th series..zzz
*
when u guys were using the 8th series, I was drooling on u guys with my 3870 sad.gif
azxel
post Mar 2 2009, 07:08 PM

moological mooster
Group Icon
VIP
3,421 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 2 30 N, 112 30 E
was reading PC Gamer and notice something... correct my eyes.. did I just see a 1.79GB nVidia GTX295 graphics card?!?! shocking.gif
G_KeN
post Mar 2 2009, 07:14 PM

~~Cheers love <3~~
******
Senior Member
1,453 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
Yes...? And what's wrong with 1.7GB gtx295? laugh.gif
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 07:45 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(azxel @ Mar 2 2009, 07:08 PM)
was reading PC Gamer and notice something... correct my eyes.. did I just see a 1.79GB nVidia GTX295 graphics card?!?! shocking.gif
*
no mod, u saw it clearly. smile.gif

This post has been edited by metsatsu: Mar 2 2009, 07:46 PM
0168257061
post Mar 2 2009, 07:49 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(metsatsu @ Mar 2 2009, 06:41 PM)
lol, you are merely repeating what RegentCid has stated. If you stated that 65nm oc just as good as 55nm, then I can agree on that. but theoratically 55nm oc better than 65nm. Due to smaller die, 55nm draws less power and produce less heat, these in returns leaves a head room for more oc'ing. No doubt that it was mentioned by Fudzilla that early reference desgin of GTX 285 and GTX 260 (55nm) can oc only the same as their 65nm counterpart, but there are also alot of reported higher oc for 55nm in other forums.
So again, a link to show and prove that [b]65nm is more superior than 55nm would be great.[/B] otherwise they are pretty much the same, not 65nm better 55nm.
*
sish, links again.
prove yourself like acecombat,
no money ? sell of ya GTS295 then rclxm9.gif brows.gif
again, who start the OC ability discussion. regent he just mentioned flashing bios wink.gif
ZzZzz...
post Mar 2 2009, 08:00 PM

Art of Sleeping
******
Senior Member
1,787 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


may i know wat the most updated and recommended driver for the GeForce 8400M GS????



ty for the reply~
metsatsu
post Mar 2 2009, 08:17 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(168257061 @ Mar 2 2009, 07:49 PM)
sish, links again.
prove yourself like acecombat,
no money ? sell of ya GTS295 then  rclxm9.gif   brows.gif
again, who start the OC ability discussion. regent he just mentioned flashing bios wink.gif
*
Well I just think that before anyone starts giving a controversial or contradicting statement, he/she should have a valid explanations or valid proof before causing flames in the thread. just because some guy said so, and just simply taking the words for it does not prove the statement is valid. All I want is a good solid proof with good reference to backup, this does not mean I dismissed everybody's point of view. Well, if ppl here prefer to believe that 65nm is superior than 55nm in OC'ing, rather than giving me a more valid proof (eg. comparing an apple to an apple for a start) then I can end my search for answer right here. enough said. doh.gif cool.gif

This post has been edited by metsatsu: Mar 2 2009, 08:18 PM
0168257061
post Mar 2 2009, 08:34 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(metsatsu @ Mar 2 2009, 09:17 PM)
Well I just think that before anyone starts giving a controversial or contradicting statement, he/she should have a valid explanations or valid proof before causing flames in the thread. just because some guy said so, and just simply taking the words for it does not prove the statement is valid. All I want is a good solid proof with good reference to backup, this does not mean I dismissed everybody's point of view. Well, if ppl here prefer to believe that 65nm is superior than 55nm in OC'ing, rather than giving me a more valid proof (eg. comparing an apple to an apple for a start) then I can end my search for answer right here. enough said.  doh.gif cool.gif
*
sure, good luck in researching biggrin.gif
I don't want to get missleading by forumers, no one like it, because im planning for another gpu smile.gif

131 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0153sec    0.56    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:40 AM