Continue your debates, rants and stuff here.
Version 1 : CLICK ME
Version 2 : CLICK ME
Version 3 : CLICK ME
This post has been edited by kianwee: Aug 14 2010, 02:03 PM
CLOSED
CLOSED
|
|
Jan 29 2009, 08:46 AM, updated 16y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2009, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2009, 07:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
We seriously need a moderator in this section.
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(KCv3 @ Feb 1 2009, 10:44 PM) Am looking for Plasma 42". Saw lots of good feedback on panny PV80H (RM3.2k). Anyone has any input on Hitachi E102A (RM3.5k) and LG PG60 (RM3.8k)? Speaking from my personal experience as a user of PV80 and PG60, I prefer PG60 more. Color reproduction seems better to me. And of course sexier exterior design.Saw the Hitachi E102A, the picture output turns out not as'fat' as others. |
|
|
Mar 3 2009, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Apis_LuaLua @ Mar 3 2009, 10:56 AM) i am noobie here.. may i know what is the advantage plasma tv over lcd tv? which is the best for watching astro? can some one pm me? Here, Click Me |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 7 2009, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(shibby123 @ Mar 7 2009, 01:12 PM) HI there, I do have one 42" LG plasma TV to sell and so far I have used less than 150 hours. Post in garage sales instead.Due to studying oversea soon, selling it at RM 2000 . TV unit + remote control + all original cable + 1 wall rack unit . Feel free to contact me at 019- 7570 999 (sms is prefered) . Thanks |
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Mar 11 2009, 09:32 PM) see? what did i tell u... N.A.T.O. (no action talk only) Huhuhuhuhuhu..... nice one. Someone 'experience' batang before. and i wouldn't know anything bout bai/black batangs coz never tried them but guess u have experienced.. This post has been edited by kianwee: Mar 11 2009, 11:53 PM |
|
|
Mar 20 2009, 02:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2009, 12:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jvchia @ Mar 21 2009, 07:22 PM) 1. Plasma and LCD technology - what's the difference? Plasma and LCD panels may look similar, but the flat screen and thin profile is where the similarities end. Plasma screens, as its name suggests, uses a matrix of tiny gas plasma cells charged by precise electrical voltages to create a picture. LCD screens (liquid crystal display) are in layman's terms sandwiches made up of liquid crystal pushed in the space between two glass plates. Images are created by varying the amount electrical charge applied to the crystals. Each technology has its strengths and weaknesses, as you'll read below. 2. Is there a difference in picture quality between plasma and LCD screens and normal CRT TVs? It's not what's happening behind the screen that's important - it's how the screen performs as a television that matters the most. In that regard, both plasma and LCD sets produce excellent pictures, although many home entertainment specialists and gamers still say CRTs produce the best overall images (although the latest plasmas are particularly good, and LCD sets are quickly catching up in terms of quality). Those same home entertainment specialists will tell you that for basic home theatre-like usage, plasma screens have a slight edge over LCDs. This is because plasma screens can display blacks more accurately than LCDs can, which means better contrast and detail in dark-coloured television or movie scenes. The nature of LCD technology, where a backlight shines through the LCD layer, means it's hard for it to achieve true blacks because there's always some light leakage from between pixels. This is steadily improving with every new generation of LCD, however. 3. What advantages does plasma have over LCD? Apart from better contrast due to its ability to show deeper blacks, plasma screens typically have better viewing angles than LCD. Viewing angles are how far you can sit on either side of a screen before the picture's quality is affected. You tend to see some brightness and colour shift when you're on too far of an angle with LCDs, while a plasma's picture remains fairly solid. This is steadily changing, however, with more and more LCDs entering the market with viewing angles equal to or greater than some plasmas. Plasmas can also produce a brighter colour, once again due to light leakage on an LCD affecting its colour saturation. Plasma pundits will also tell you that some LCD screens have a tendency to blur images, particularly during fast moving scenes in movies or in sports. While that was true for older generation LCD screens, newer models have improved significantly -- so much so that the differences in performance between LCDs and plasmas in this regard is almost negligible (here's a tip -- if you're shopping for LCDs, check the pixel response time, measured in ms. The lower it is, the better the image quality in fast moving scenes). Traditionally, the biggest advantage plasmas have had over their LCD cousins is price, particularly in the large screen end of the market. In the past 12 months, this has changed, with LCDs matching or even beating plasmas in both resolution and price. Plasmas being sold in Australia generally run between 42-inches and 63-inches wide, with the cheapest standard definition 42-inch selling for approximately AU$2,300 (although you can expect to find sets cheaper than AU$2,000 in real world prices). 60-inch and above plasmas can go for as much as $25,000. LCDs, on the other hand, generally top out around the 52-inch mark -- though there is now a ludicrously expensive 70-inch Sony available -- but are incredibly competitive with similar-sized plasmas. In the six months since we last updated this feature, prices of the replacements of two flagship TVs have dropped by a third. Sony's high end 52-inch KDL52W3100 LCD, for example, retails for AU$6,799 (down from AU$9,999), while Pioneer's top of the line 50-inch PDP-LX508A plasma goes for AU$$7,999 (down from AU$10,999). 4. What advantages does LCD have over plasma? Apart from being price competitive, LCD has the edge over plasma in several other key areas. LCDs tend to have higher native resolution than plasmas of similar size, which means more pixels on a screen. LCDs also tend to consume less power than plasma screens, with some estimates ranging that power saving at up to 30 per cent less than plasma. LCDs are also generally lighter than similar sized plasmas, making it easier to move around or wall mount. LCD pundits also point to the fact that LCDs have a longer lifespan than plasma screens. This was true of earlier plasma models, which would lose half of their brightness after more than 20,000 hours of viewing. Later plasma generations have bumped that up to anything between 30,000 and 60,000 hours. LCDs, on the other hand, are guaranteed for 60,000 hours. You might have also heard that plasmas suffer from screen burn in, an affliction not as commonly associated with LCDs. Screen burn in occurs when an image is left too long on a screen, resulting in a ghost of that image burned in permanently. Newer plasmas are less susceptible to this thanks to improved technology and features such as screen savers, but burn-in is still a problem. But after a few days of use most burnt-in images will fade -- they are no longer permanent. 5. Which is better value for me right now: plasma or LCD? If you're in the market for a big screen television -- and we're talking 50-inches and above -- then we'd suggest plasma as a safe bet. Plasmas give you more bang for your buck at the big end of town, and while LCDs can give you better resolution, plasma still has the edge in terms of picture quality. One other thing to look for, whether you opt for plasma or LCD, is an integrated tuner -- many TVs still have analogue tuners, which look pretty terrible on a large screen. Try to get a model with an inbuilt HD tuner if you can. At the smaller end of things (15" to 42" TVs), LCD is the only way to go if you want something slim and tasteful. And the best thing is that LCDs are getting cheaper all the time. 6. Do I need to buy 1080p? If you're a true high-def junkie who's keen to see every pixel of a high-res 1080i/p image reproduced pixel-by-pixel (providing you have a source that high, of course), then LCDs are seemingly the way to go. However, top-of-the line plasmas will also display 1080p content, so the choice isn't as easy as it once was. Despite the current HD buzz, there is still very little content available in 1080p -- especially compared to the infinite amount of SD content like TV programs and DVDs. Though buying 1080p now may mean you get some degree of futureproofing, you may not be getting the best picture. It's not all about the resolution. For example, one of the best TVs we've seen yet is only 720p (HD) compliant -- the Pioneer PDP-508XDA -- and yet 1080p content still looks better on it than on any LCD you could name. Unless you measure your screen size in metres, 1368 x 768 resolution could still be enough for your needs. QUOTE(ic-klass @ Mar 21 2009, 08:40 PM) Nothing to wooow about, just a copy and paste from here : http://www.cnet.com.au/tvs/0,239035250,240036500,00.htm@jvchia, appreciate if you can give credit to the original author by linking the source next time. |
|
|
Mar 22 2009, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2009, 09:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Anyone went to the Panasonic Roadshow outside HM in Pyramid today?
|
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 07:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(lightning69 @ Mar 26 2009, 12:36 AM) Panasonic Malaysia finally announce 2009 Viera HDTVs!!!! Anyone seen it yet? Maybe at the panasonic roadshow?KUALA LUMPUR--In a few hours' time, Panasonic will be announcing its latest Viera HDTVs slated for Asia with an expanded lineup from 15 in 2008 to 23 models this year. To be unveiled at the regional media event is a series of ultraslim plasma panels (PDP), multimedia-ready LCD TVs and THX-certified displays. The spotlight will, however, be on the two NeoPDP prototypes first debuted at January's Consumer Electronics Show in the US. Here are all the highlights and some key features found on Panasonic’s upcoming flat-panel offerings. In an updated technological demonstration of its NeoPDP, Panasonic has set a new yardstick with an enhanced 42-inch prototype that consumes only a third of the power used by its 2007 model. This compares favorably against the 50-percent energy savings offered by this year’s entries featured at this launch. Similarly, its engineers have shed approximately two-thirds of an inch off the original 50-inch NeoPDP. Not only is it 8.8mm wide at its slimmest section, the panel also packs the world's highest 1,080 lines motion resolution according to its press release. At the core of Panasonic's latest 2009 Viera plasma TVs is its eco-friendly NeoPDP technology. Besides delivering similar luminance using just half the power of a comparable 2007 model, NeoPDP panels also offer increased brightness boosting native contrast by 33 percent to 40,000:1. In addition, you can expect sharper moving images and richer hues, courtesy of a stepped-up 600Hz sub-field drive and digital cinema color system, respectively. The former ensures full 1,080 lines motion resolution, while the latter widens the color space to 120 percent over the HDTV standard. As for the Viera LCD range, Panasonic has doubled the panels' dynamic contrast to 20,000:1. For the record, the plasmas feature a peak, though less accurate, 2 million:1 dynamic contrast. Another notable change is that the number of LCD series has mushroomed from four to eight. These aside, most of the new LCD entries have either the In-Plane Switching (IPS) or IPS Alpha panels found in their 2008 counterparts. Popular among videophiles, IPS displays and their derivatives are renowned for their exceptionally wide viewing angle and saturated colors. In a rather unprecedented bid to differentiate its TVs from the competition, all the new Vieras are equipped with onboard JPEG playback via a high-capacity SDHC card slot. Some of the premium panels will also come with added AVCHD and new MPEG-2 file support for playing back video. Unfortunately, the Japanese company is sidelining Asia again as far as the Viera Cast Internet content service is concerned. In the US and UK, Viera HDTVs with this feature allow users to stream YouTube videos and display Picasa Web photos onto the big screen for free using a Web connection. Go here to see the Full HD plasma range for Malaysian markey. No pricing yet. Go here for HD ready Plasma. And finally go here for Full HD LCD tv from Panasonic malaysia. This post has been edited by kianwee: Mar 26 2009, 07:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Looks like Panasonic Malaysia just added 4 new models to their website...
http://www.panasonic.com.my/web/productsso...v/plasmatvlcdtv This post has been edited by kianwee: Mar 26 2009, 05:30 PM |
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 07:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2009, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Don't know about you guys, for me this 2009 design seems to be nicer.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2009, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2009, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Exactly, nor everyone is tech savvy like most of the forumers here. Not everyone knows how to download movies from the internet, copy to thumbdrive and watch using HDTV. Panasonic's concept is to tell consumer, even the less tech savvy ones that they can watch their captured images and videos from external capture devices in 3 easy steps. SD-link is not a stupid idea at all.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0493sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 06:35 PM |