Any link to prove your statement above?

Would love to see a reliable comparison link before jumping to the conclusion

Shot using SAL75300? It seems like your lens front focused a little. The dress is sharper than her eyes.

Speaking of the picture, perhaps a less busy background would be better?

You sure Tammy has 24-70? or were you referring to Tammy 28-75mm f2.8?

It's Sigma then. AFAIK Tammy don't have 24-70

Sounds too goo to be true kind of deal huh.

A used one is usually sold around RM1xxx.

Erk, I don't recall myself 'going on offensive'. I'm just curious of the CZ's performance hence I would appreciate it a lot if someone could post of side to side comparison between the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VS CZ 16-80 instead of saying 'ah, I feel this is sharp, that is sharp' kind of stuff. Afterall, it's for the benefit of the alphians too. At least you can just show someone the comparisons in case someone ask in future rather than telling them 'I heard from my next door aunty' kinda stuff.

Well, if you choose to listen blindly. You can always continue doing so.

p/s: No, I don't own a Sony Alpha anymore. If I'm still with my Alpha, I would have bought both, try and make comparison rather than telling people ' hey, I've just mildly molested it' or 'hey, someone told me it's sharper'.


This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 07:33 PM

It's even funnier to see people who can't even understand proper England. I mentioned I doubt, that's the reason I requested for someone to post a side by side comparison so that others can see better

Still too early to jump to the conclusion. It's not proven yet

He stepped on some blood or red paint?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 08:16 PM

Just go for it.

The noise control is simply superb. Spec wise, can easily pawn A900

p/s: Btw where did you got poisoned by this beast?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 08:19 PM

Oh ok. Just noticed that it's a handprint

Congratz for being one of the selected one

D3. cough cough. That huge beast gonna burn a bloody big hold in ya pocket weh.

That's why even pro shooter like Ted Adnan migrated to D3 for some serious performance

Don't worry, slowly save up more by taking some part time job, who knows someday you'll be proud owner of D3

Nevermind. Just stay with what you have first. Migrate later once you have sufficient fund. Enjoy what you have now

Don't forget you still need to pair with some nice lenses

When's your turn then?

Get the 50mm f1.4 straight!

No worries. People like liewwk and Ted Adnan also migrated once they want something better. For the time being just save up more

---

Added on February 8, 2009, 9:51 pmEh, since you have the Tammy 17-50mm f2.8 and CZ16-80mm, how about you do a side by side comparison between them?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 09:51 PM

You bought from overseas?

Owh ok. That's really overseas

In terms of spec, D300 anytime. Unless you wanna pick those teeny-weeny features to compare. Oh ya. One advise from you. When you are asking for comparison, always ask from every side which are involved. That will make you judge better rather then listening to just one side.

Just like, on the other hand, you'll get this reply about A900 and Sony.





Yea, thanks for being the morning clown. I'm quite amused. You might wanna brush up ya England a little bit more unless you plan to continue making fun of yourself.

Perhaps you could share the conversation between you and the seller here so that we can avoid that seller in future?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 9 2009, 10:41 AM

Try shooting portraits with that lens. You'll get some cute donut bokeh

Btw how much you got it for?

Today is public holiday la. What kind of blues? Or he's having his PMS?

You didn't shoot for Thaipusam?

Sad to say you still don't understand the meaning of doubt.

Why are you so cooked up over this? Is it wrong to post what others comment about something? Some people might say that Sony is god-like, some might think that it's just another piece of thrash. Whether they say it's good or not, it's up to you to digest. Don't tell me you are those who can't accept what others comment? or your ears only welcome good points of the brand you are using? Do ponder about it.



This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 9 2009, 12:56 PM