Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V20!, The Orange Legion
|
ryugan
|
Jan 28 2009, 01:28 PM
|
|
ironman: nice shot, but out door seems to be lack of light, dark, 1st pic. try to avoid shadow appearance from the wood pillar, esp belly part and shoulder. i mean sexy part, reveal it indoor shoot. lots of 'cut off' leg, elbow. last pic. the shoe. This post has been edited by ryugan: Jan 28 2009, 01:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Jan 28 2009, 02:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(IRONMAN_7767 @ Jan 28 2009, 01:14 PM) Sony Flash Workshop Pic Spam Outdoor Shoot » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « nose-bleeding time..
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazril
|
Jan 28 2009, 02:18 PM
|
|
i need tissue....ALOT...!!
hohohohoho!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
vtecturbo
|
Jan 28 2009, 02:46 PM
|
New Member
|
Printstop akan mengadakan satu sesi talk mengenai studio lighting. mereka yang patut hadir adalah Peminat-peminat Fotografi yang sudah atau baru berkecimpung dalam Wedding Photography, Event, product dan sebagainya.Untuk maklumat lanjut sila lawati www.communications.net.my/v2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
huhufish
|
Jan 28 2009, 02:55 PM
|
New Member
|
hie guys, i've got my maybank sony card already...hahaha... will get my a300 and the hvl 58 tonight.. but now been thinking of getting the twin or single kit lense...any advice? camera vertical grip a must or an excess? appreciate a quick advice cause tonight wanna buy d...hehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
dinraxxx
|
Jan 28 2009, 03:10 PM
|
|
Nose Bleed event has started lol...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSamadeo
|
Jan 28 2009, 03:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(huhufish @ Jan 28 2009, 02:55 PM) hie guys, i've got my maybank sony card already...hahaha... will get my a300 and the hvl 58 tonight.. but now been thinking of getting the twin or single kit lense...any advice? camera vertical grip a must or an excess? appreciate a quick advice cause tonight wanna buy d...hehehe A300 twin kit lens is a good combi as it comes with SAL55200 which is a good lens
|
|
|
|
|
|
syafix
|
Jan 28 2009, 03:32 PM
|
|
i'm looking for DSLR, A200 suits with my budget, but some people said it's got high noise what's that? izit true? any lack of this slr? This post has been edited by syafix: Jan 28 2009, 03:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
dinraxxx
|
Jan 28 2009, 03:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(syafix @ Jan 28 2009, 03:32 PM) i'm looking for DSLR, A200 suits with my budget, but some people said it's got high noise what's that? izit true? any lack of this slr? well to be frank it's kinda true.But you'll get used to it.I also use the A200 but never mind of it's noise really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kucingfight
|
Jan 28 2009, 03:39 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(syafix @ Jan 28 2009, 03:32 PM) i'm looking for DSLR, A200 suits with my budget, but some people said it's got high noise what's that? izit true? any lack of this slr? yeap it's true, the sony has noiser image relatively, on iso800 above. it's a small trade off, considering ur getting: - 9 AF points - relatively cheaper price - build in Image stabilizer (SSS) the canon and nikon has its downside too, to name a few, some might agree that the color reproduction on nikon is a bit too 'vivid' making it too comic like, and u only get 3 AF points
|
|
|
|
|
|
signither
|
Jan 28 2009, 04:38 PM
|
|
hi guys.. im looking for sony 50mm f/1.4 right now.. but cannot find used one and my budget is kinda tight to afford the new one.. is it worth to settle down with the minolta 50mm f/1.4 instead?? or should i just get the minolta 50mm f/1.7?? thanks in advance..
|
|
|
|
|
|
nickilala
|
Jan 28 2009, 04:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(signither @ Jan 28 2009, 04:38 PM) hi guys.. im looking for sony 50mm f/1.4 right now.. but cannot find used one and my budget is kinda tight to afford the new one.. is it worth to settle down with the minolta 50mm f/1.4 instead?? or should i just get the minolta 50mm f/1.7?? thanks in advance.. as i know used 50mm 1.4 almost cost 1k.. buy used 50mm 1.7 if ur budget tight.. RM500-580.. i juz bought one.. very useful in night shot using handheld.. u can ask cjlai still have stock or not.. he is a nice selling.. good luck. happy cny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freezefrost
|
Jan 28 2009, 04:48 PM
|
Getting Started

|
u shoot the a200 with external flash then should be okay la...set ISO at 800..noise is not very apparent, unless you are super fussy and pixel peep alot, but in practical terms..it doens't really matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ikttan
|
Jan 28 2009, 04:57 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(nickilala @ Jan 28 2009, 04:42 PM) as i know used 50mm 1.4 almost cost 1k.. buy used 50mm 1.7 if ur budget tight.. RM500-580.. i juz bought one.. very useful in night shot using handheld.. u can ask cjlai still have stock or not.. he is a nice selling.. good luck. happy cny. Yup, agree ... ask cjlai whether he has anymore for sale. Nice fella ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kucingfight
|
Jan 28 2009, 05:07 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
mm speaking bout 50mm f1.7/1.8, comparing sony's (minolta) to nikon's version, it's like rm600(sony-used) vs rm400(nikon-new). wow is there something i'm missing for the price differences? different range?
This post has been edited by kucingfight: Jan 28 2009, 05:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Jan 28 2009, 05:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Jan 28 2009, 03:39 PM) yeap it's true, the sony has noiser image relatively, on iso800 above. it's a small trade off, considering ur getting: - 9 AF points - relatively cheaper price - build in Image stabilizer (SSS) the canon and nikon has its downside too, to name a few, some might agree that the color reproduction on nikon is a bit too 'vivid' making it too comic like, and u only get 3 AF points so the color thing, those nikon got more vivid look?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kucingfight
|
Jan 28 2009, 05:41 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Jan 28 2009, 05:35 PM) so the color thing, those nikon got more vivid look?  i was reading over the comparisons @ dcresource.com. I think that's the best review site so far, as it seems to be 'neutral' on all brands, laying down pros n cons. Let me pick up one of his comments. (I do agree with this), again it is only his opinion. ''I had mixed feelings about the D60's photo quality, and I think a lot of people will disagree with me here. I think that the photos produced by the camera are too soft, and way oversaturated. Colors are so vivid that they almost appear cartoonish, in my opinion. You can dial down the saturation a bit (and increase the sharpness) using the Optimize Image feature, though I'd use that on a case-by-case basis, as it can make things a bit too dull.'This post has been edited by kucingfight: Jan 28 2009, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
joker_jr
|
Jan 28 2009, 05:48 PM
|
|
one of my nikon fren told me that he really like sony color n he told me that the output from my a200 didnt need too much PP when he using it for wedding album compare to the image from his d80 n d200. (we always doing wedding job together n i leave to him to pp, process n print album...)
i think its just personal preference....
|
|
|
|
|
|
marauderz
|
Jan 28 2009, 05:54 PM
|
|
vertical ggrip is not a necessity unless you shoot a lot of pictures to need the longer battery life or shoot a lot of pics in potrait orientation to want to have the convinience.
|
|
|
|
|