hi, just wanna ask some opinions!
i have a200 - should i upgrade lens maybe to a 16-105mm or should i sell the body and get A700 with 18-70mm? budget got problem sikit la..

u shoot the a200 with external flash then should be okay la...set ISO at 800..noise is not very apparent, unless you are super fussy and pixel peep alot, but in practical terms..it doens't really matter.

hmm why sony only got 1 thread, nikon got practically 1 thread for every model

LOL. time to open one thread for a700 and a900 and maybe one for the rumoured a800 as well.

raist86, go test and post results yea!

i went and read up on the 17-70mm, sounds like not a bad lens at all. btw 16-105mm and this, which one you all prefer?

yup i saw already. thanks

i'd say its a pretty decent shot. pp'ed your pic for fun

yes, CPL also has effects of making reflection on any reflective surface minimal.

it does produce great results for sky too.

main purpose of a filter is to protect your lens, of course. if scratch the filter, can change new. but if scratch lens..bye bye.

i don't know if you've owned any camera before, but if you've decided that you're into photography and planning to get a dslr one day, just skip the tiny point and shoot cameras and go straight for a DSLR.

i made that mistake too. in one year i changed 3 cameras

eh, got such lens meh 58 F2?

woah, didn't know sony was gonna close 27 factories. that's quite alot, i wonder if that would affect prices - go up because 'limited editions' or go down because demand fall, most change to canon or nikon.

the zeiss may be hard to resist, but with the money you can probably get the tammy + a flash, i think that can be more practical then throwing all your money (assuming you have limited) to one lens alone.

soft at 2.8? could it be that u focus wrongly?

ho ho you guys got poisoned by albnok's gears eh? i see new equipments coming in the future

brotherHT is selling his 18-250mm for 1.4k somewhere in the garage sale.

cjlai got 50mm ma